Baksfamous112
Registered User
- Jul 21, 2016
- 7,322
- 4,404
Agreed with Horvat's heavier style however Suzuki is equally good on the defensive side of the puck. He's also 4 years younger.Horvat. I like Suzuki a lot and think he has a slightly higher offensive ceiling but I would like to see Horvat finally get a chance to play with good wingers for the first time in his career. I also think the small offensive gap is bridged by Horvat's better defensive play and heavier style of play.
Both have shown themselves to be very good playoff performers but Horvat's goal scoring in the playoffs breaks down to a goal every two games which is elite in 23 games.
Horvat now and Suzuki longer term
And its going the opposite way the OP was hoping LOLBro this is so petty. You seriously made a poll because of trade proposal.
Suzuki will surpass Horvat production/contribution as soon as next season. That said, even though he is 5 years younger.
This poll result for now is a bit biased and will not age well...
Suzuki will surpass Horvat production/contribution as soon as next season. That said, even though he is 5 years younger.
This poll result for now is a bit biased and will not age well...
Suzuki haa a career high of 41 points only.
Still too young to know if he is the real deal, or early flash in the pan.
Have you watch the playoff or not at all ? He was the best player of a Stanley Cup Final Team behind Carey Price. He is not a '' early flash in the pan ''
Do you not know what a flash in the pan is?
Andrew Hammond
Jonathan Cheechoo
Jim Carey
Andrew Raycroft
Teddy Purcell
Ryan Malone
Frederick Modin
Dave Lowry (40 points, big playoff run on Panthers, lost in finals, hmmmm)
Fernando Pisani
It's just too early in Suzuki's career to say he is better than a known product that is Horvat