AB13
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2019
- 6,998
- 2,605
I give up. There’s no arguing with someone who thinks Arsenal is anything better than mediocre at this point.
If Arsenal are mediocre, the team that finished a single point above them are too
I give up. There’s no arguing with someone who thinks Arsenal is anything better than mediocre at this point.
Again one team actually had CL success. The other hasn’t been in the CL for how long?If Arsenal are mediocre, the team that finished a single point above them are too
“Torriera was the best midfielder in the Prem for a 2 month period“
Legit one of the funniest things I’ve read on here in a long time.
Bragging about losing a final and calling it success just shows what a joke Tottenham is.Again one team actually had CL success.
Considering that’s something the likes of RM, PSG, City, Barca, etc. didn’t do this year. Also I hope you know that there hasn’t been a single Spurs fan arguing with you yet. You are just stating things that are straight up wrong. You really need to take off the homer glasses.Bragging about losing a final and calling it success just shows what a joke Tottenham is
“Torriera was the best midfielder in the Prem for a 2 month period“
Legit one of the funniest things I’ve read on here in a long time.
Considering that’s something the likes of RM, PSG, City, Barca, etc. didn’t do this year. Also I hope you know that there hasn’t been a single Spurs fan arguing with you yet. You are just stating things that are straight up wrong. You really need to take off the homer glasses.
I have not seen one thing you’ve backed up with facts other than basing your City/Liverpool argument on 5ish games and claiming Torreira was the best player in the PL and claiming Guendouzi is bad based on the eye test.Losing a final is never a success, no matter who you knock out. I didn’t think losing the UCL final in 2006 was a success even though United, Bayern, Juventus, RM and more failed to get there. I didn’t consider the Rangers losing the final in 2014 a success even though Washington and Pittburgh didn’t get there, and you didn’t consider losing the 2016 final a success either.
What have I said that was straight up wrong. I have based most of it on stats and facts and you have done nothing but say that Spurs played in the UCL and finished one point above us.
What have I said that was straight up wrong.
The owner is very concerning of course but our future ceirtainly does not look worse than for Tottenham or United, at least not considering they haven’t signed anyone.
Arsenal struggled with a lot more injuries too
I would rather play for Arsenal, they have a lot more promising youngsters, a new promising coach who is starting to implement his ideas, a huge loyal global fanbase ( in contrast to Tottenham who basically have no fans at all) and a rich history with lots of titles.
Spurs don’t have one that I could see become a first team regular besides possibly Oliver Skipp
There were some early rumors about United targeting him if De Gea leaves. Wonder if this’ll push them a little more towards that. Although I’m not sure where de gea goes at this point. PSG seems the only option, but I haven’t seen anything linking them from good sources.
I have not seen one thing you’ve backed up with facts other than basing your City/Liverpool argument on 5ish games and claiming Torreira was the best player in the PL and claiming Guendouzi is bad based on the eye test.
It is a statistical fact not an opinion, how are stats funny?It was funnier when he said that Arsenal are on par with Liverpool and Manchester City when Guendouzi isn't playing.
Does anyone remember days when 30-40 million bought you a world class player?
It is a statistical fact not an opinion, how are stats funny?
Over the past decade Spurs have had a very good and stable upwards progression. Daniel Levy is one of the most business-savvy directors around, not relying on any sort of sugar daddy and focusing on long term sustainability. They have a very young and promising squad with a seemingly commited manager. How does Arsenal's future look better? Their financial reports sure don't look good.
Just no.
You clearly do not want to be taken seriously.
You seem to know jack all. Troy Parrott for example is one of the brightest players of his age. Absolutely demolished the U-18 league at the age of 16.
UM because the sample size of 13 games vs. 38 is so massively different that that "data" is irrelevant...
What???
It is not irrelevant, 13 is a relatively large sample size, and I never claimed we where close to Liverpool and City without him, all I said was that our records where similar.
That's one of those things that is technically "true" but not at all "accurate".