Exactly this.Weird timing of it. It's almost like the organization is doubling down on "it's Phil Kessel's fault we lost, our coach is awesome" theme.
I would have rather they waited until mid-season, at least, to see how the team performs over the first half. If it looks like the team has improved its work ethic and structure, then sign him. If not, they maybe it was time to move on from him. Now you're either stuck with him for 4 years or have to get the ownership's approval to get rid of someone with that much term left.
It's just dumb. It's like they completely ignored the last two years or just chalked it up to Phil's fault. That's a dangerous level of stupid.Well I'd like to thank the Penguins for officially ruining my long weekend
Here I thought they were FINALLY putting the screws to Sully by hiring his de facto replacement if things went south early in the year (odds are that they indeed will)
So they purposely painted themselves into a corner before they had to (see JJ contract and Tanev). I mean nothing precludes extending him during the middle of the year or immediately after this season if they like what they saw
Anyone know how much his salary will be?
Term isn’t really an issue because they can fire him. Money shouldn’t be an issue because he likely goes into another coaching job and they pay for it (or most of it)