Actually last year Pacioretty led the team with 39 goals while second was Plekanec at 20. People tend to forget but the offense was even worse last season.
We would still make the playoffs without Subban because we have Markov. If you take Patches out from last year's team though, our offense would look similar to the Buffalo Sabres one.
It's better this year with Plekanec and Gallagher at 24 and Galchenyuk at 20 goals.
You realize Subban is not only great in his zone, but he also had just 7pts less than Pacioretty last year.
Subban is a player that drives the play towards the opposing zone a lot. He also plays more than Patches, and there's only 6 Dmen on a line up (7 at times) that would need to compensate for the loss of Subban vs 12 Forwards. So it's more about who you have that can take over either guy. Markov could not take on anymore responsibilities and playing with PK makes him way more effective.
Last year, Gallagher playing with Patches turned him into a skilled grinder. He gets more scoring opportunities not playing on that line because all Patches does is shoot and DD always looks for Patches, so Gallagher doesn't get the most chances to put it in. Before he moved to the DD-Patches line, he was on a 30g pace with Eller-Galch.
Not saying he would have put up 30 goals, but just that without Patches, we would have to reassign the top 6, and that could have still worked.
Losing PK though, I just don't see how it could work. We had Markov (would also be less effective), Diaz (half season), Emelin, Murray, Bouillon, Weaver, Gorges. There's no way they could handle for the loss of Subban.
Our offensive isn't that different from last year btw, we're on pace to finish with 6 more goals.
Saying Subban is more important is not a knock on Patches whatsoever however. Just like saying Price is more important than either of those guys. All three of them are extremely key to us.