and if you think Calgary is relocating again, for the 6th time in the last 16 years, what city are they going to, knowing the history of the way the Flames operate the franchise, I have a suspicion that the AHL has a hand in this just as the way a) the League is operated and b) THE precedent set by the Oilers, whether to operate a franchise or face the loss of it, ie termination, WHICH is why OKC was the option for the 5 years there, before 2014/15, why did the 2nd 5 year option not been exercised if the reports are accurate that Stockton inherited the contract originally signed by the Thunder as has been reported, wouldn't that have been rectified since 2014/15, WHY are they claiming that needs to be done, and the city is in agreement of the 1 yr bridge lease, pending a longer-term extension.... this isn't like an affiliation extension, but they are hand in hand and treated identically, under the rules set forth by the AHL, no affiliation, no franchise, no lease, no franchise.... we said that a ten year lease or affiliation typically doesn't work, when in fact it's the opposite, why did Providence recently extend their PDC for ten years to 2029, EVEN THOUGH, logistically, THEIR ownership is independent of the affiliation, AND IT IS RUN, MUCH the same way that if there was no local ties, Boston controls how the franchise operates, much as Calgary does in Stockton, wouldn't you think that Boston should buy the affiliate outright, because it's operated that way.