He has shown he is capable of playing #1 Fyi he plays 22 23 mins a night. Was best d on team Canada twice and team north America. Nothing you can do about being behind petro. But hey no reason to convince anyone he is staying put. Fyi he is better than Larson and half the #1rhds in the league.
Proposal: STL, CBJ, Tor
- Thread starter Kshahdoo
- Start date
Jordan Belfort
Registered User
Leaf Fans
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 19,856
- 8,339
Isn't that the reason why some people think he is overrated? Personally, I don't think he is overrated either, but I think his ubiquitous need leads people to believe that.
BleedBlue14
UrGeNcY
Does STL and CBJ get to replace their players as well?
So then...
TML give Kapanen + Hyman, gain Jenner
STL give Edmundson, gain Kapanen + Hyman
CBJ give Jenner, gain Edmundson
??
BleedBlue14
UrGeNcY
Jordan Belfort
Registered User
Fair enough. I just want this clown to offer the following...
That's a joke right how bought we give you three picks for orielly. Lo l really bad
Simply put, the Blues have enough forwards. We are going to have difficulty incorporating up and coming prospects like Thomas and Kyrou into the roster in the next two years as it is. So, we are not going to trade a defenseman for another forward. Having said that, we could always upgrade the forwards we have for other forwards, picks and prospects. Say, for example, Panarin or Nylander for Schwartz+, or Fabbri +. The point is, the trade won't be for a defenseman, which I guess kind of rules Toronto out as a trade partner. Columbus, I'm not sure.
Last edited:
Nylanderthal
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2010
- 7,892
- 6,237
I'm not even for Panarin for Schwartz, but Nylander for Schwartz is just gross. Why are we trading our best player last year when we are trying to go into our best years?
I actually agree with you, I was just offering up examples. I wouldn't do either trade! There are people on our sub-forum who like Panarin so much they would part with anybody on our roster for him. I just mentioned Schwartz or Fabbri because hypothetically, it makes sense to offer another LW. I prefer Schwartz to Panarin too, but there are others who would disagree. As for Nylander, I am simply not interested at all. I think we should just stand pat and see what develops in camp.
Vincenzo Arelliti
He Can't Play Center
I would bet that those who prefer Schwartz to Panarin haven’t watched Panarin and think there is a huge difference in their defensive game - there isn’t.
Although it is possible to prefer Schwartz’s style. Regardless, I wouldn’t want to trade Schwartz for Panarin (despite whatever value might be). If we are going to bring in Panarin, we shouldn’t offset his value to us by subtracting a player of Schwartz’s caliber. The Blues should be pushing futures and non-core roster players if they are interested in Panarin, or just wait until FA.
Although it is possible to prefer Schwartz’s style. Regardless, I wouldn’t want to trade Schwartz for Panarin (despite whatever value might be). If we are going to bring in Panarin, we shouldn’t offset his value to us by subtracting a player of Schwartz’s caliber. The Blues should be pushing futures and non-core roster players if they are interested in Panarin, or just wait until FA.
