^^^Close but Sakic was the superior player especially in the playoffs, he was more clutch and clearly a better leader.
You're right, thinking the opposite is a false belief for sure.^^^
This is a false belief.
You're right, thinking the opposite is a false belief for sure.
Can't see your argument, too many Hart in the way.Can't see your argument, too many cups in the way.
Can't see your argument, too many Hart in the way.
Sorry bud still too many playoff points and OT goals in the way.Sorry buddy still too many points in the way.
Sorry bud still too many playoff points and OT goals in the way.
Must be a playoff choker, 3 series win in head to head is still greater than 2. Second biggest choker ever after 2018-19 Lightning, 62 wins but no Cup and beat by who? Oh ya Sakic and the Avalanche.Must be a playoff choker then, 3 still greater than 2
Yeah but the other one didn't have the chance to play in the highest scoring era ever though...One has also achieved points totals in a season that only Gretzky and Lemieux have hit.
Close but Sakic was the superior player especially in the playoffs, he was more clutch and clearly a better leader.
That's an original idea for a thread...
Cant go wrong with either bu Sakics one of my top 3 all time favourite players.
His 2001 season was nuts, he won the Selke/Hart/Pearson/Cup and was IIRC 3 or 4 goals away from the Richard and 3 or 4 points from the Art Ross. Had he also won those two he'd of had possibly the best individual season in history with a sweep of every single award (except the Smythe).