MajorLeafsFan
Registered User
- Jul 19, 2017
- 260
- 64
If this trade actually happened, and Dorion doesn't get Heiskanen, that would probably be his last move as Sens GM.
Well if the trade happens get ready for him to be gone, there is absolutely zero chance they get Heiskanen for Karlsson when he only has one year left on his contractIf this trade actually happened, and Dorion doesn't get Heiskanen, that would probably be his last move as Sens GM.
Anyone who thought Kling was AHL level at any point of his NHL career just straight up never saw him play. The only reason he played AHL hockey is because Nill needed to make room for him. Once in the NHL he was dominant from day 1. Has he gotten better? Yeah he is way more rounded now, but that doesnt change the fact that he was still dominating the offensive side of things as a rookieI'm not criticising Klingbergs game. I am a big fan of his. He played for my home town team before going to Dallas. But I'm telling you, posters on HF were saying at the time that Klingberg was garbage and that he belonged in the AHL. I'm not making that part up, believe it or not. More outlandish claims have been made on HF, however. Don't understand why you act so shocked?
Exactly, no sane person. But there are plenty of idiots to go around on HF.
But that's beside the point. The point being, most if not all defenceman need time to even out and become sound and reliable on both ends of the ice. There's nothing controversial about that at all. Heiskanen will take time to develop. Saying that his cost controlled years are more valuable than having Karlsson under contract on the Stars doesn't make a whole lot of sense, unless the stars are not looking to compete for a cup in the near future.
If Dallas is getting Erik K then klingberg has to be going the other way
On some level Karlsson makes more sense as a target than Tavares. The Stars need scoring up front, sure. Karlsson on the ice for 30 minutes a night makes all of the forwards better. Acquiring Karlsson would all but guarantee that at all times one of Karlsson or John Klingberg are on the ice. Not only would every team in the league be envious of that luxury, but new coach Jim Montgomery likes defensemen who can carry and move the puck. None do either better than Karlsson.
Got this tidbit from
Dallas Stars reportedly a 'stealth club' interested in Erik Karlsson. Should they go after him or John Tavares?
Honka is mep at this point. Janmark and Shore are not good young forwards and aren't anywhere close to what the Sens wanted in Glass. You pretty much have to take on Ryan's contract for Ottawa to maybe accept this package.
Agreed.
Imagine what having arguably the two best puckmovers in the game on the ice for 50 minutes a night would mean for the Stars forwards.
Would increase forward scoring across the board.
I said that was what the Stars would offer, not what the Sens would accept.
I'd want Honka, Janmark/Shore, Oettinger/Point, Robertson, 2019 1st for Karlsson straight up.
I said that was what the Stars would offer, not what the Sens would accept.
I'd want Honka, Janmark/Shore, Oettinger/Point, Robertson, 2019 1st for Karlsson straight up.
If we feel confident that we can resign Karlsson I could do that. Sure it’s a lot to give up, but we keep the most high end pieces and insure that Karlsson or Klingberg are on the ice for most of the game.
Benn - Seguin - Nichushkin
Janmark - Spezza - Radulov
Hintz - Faksa - XXX
Dickinson - Hanzal - Pitlick
Methot - Karlsson
Lindell - Klingberg
Heiskanen - Johns
Bishop
XXX
We could be a serious cup contender and still have a couple decent prospects in the cupboard.
And even after adding Karlsson, Nill would still have a ton of cap space to add another good forward and a competent backup (eg. Grabner and Ward) in free agency. And I don't think there's a better GM at adding talent through free agency.
Benn - Seguin - Nichushkin
Janmark - Spezza - Radulov
Hintz - Faksa - Grabner
Dickinson - Hanzal - Pitlick
Methot - Karlsson
Lindell - Klingberg
Heiskanen - Johns
Bishop
Ward
That's absolutely a cup contender right there.
Karlsson is in the conversation for best right handed defenseman of all time. No assets are off the table for Dallas if they want himWell that makes no sense at all.
Find any combination of assets not named Seguin, Benn, Klingberg or Heiskanen, ANY combination, and I’m game.
Karlsson is in the conversation for best right handed defenseman of all time. No assets are off the table for Dallas if they want him
When has any team ever landed the equivalent of the #3 overall pick for a rental?If this trade actually happened, and Dorion doesn't get Heiskanen, that would probably be his last move as Sens GM.
I think what we're more likely to see is a conditional trade where the Sens would get something extra (draft pick wise) if Karlsson re-signs with whatever team acquires him.Why do people keep thinking any rational GM would trade for Karlsson without an extension in place especially with July 1st around the corner. No team is going to trade the pieces needed for Karlsson without a new extension, because if he leaves after it's career suicide.
I think it's safe to assume if a Karlsson trade happens it's going to be a sign and trade. Dorion has done the last 2 sign and trades that I'm aware of in the NHL (Burrows, Turris).
Actually I thought that too, but really most of these posts are under the assumption that the trade would be a sign-and-trade.When has any team ever landed the equivalent of the #3 overall pick for a rental?
These valuations all read as though people assume Karlsson has multiple years on his deal.
The NHL doesn't do sign and trades.Actually I thought that too, but really most of these posts are under the assumption that the trade would be a sign-and-trade.
The NHL doesn't do sign and trades.
If Dallas is getting Erik K then klingberg has to be going the other way