Maybe.. but man get out of the zone...... Landeskog made two really bad decision.... that one that overule a tying goal, and he was lazy on the almost wrap around goal losing his man and screening the goaltender. Was definitely not impress with that player in last nite game.It seems like every time I am trying to catch up in the around the NHL thread, it gets closed
Regarding the Landeskog play, Mike Rupp made an interesting comment on NHL on the Fly last night which I had never heard before.
He said that Landeskog was on the ice forever and it went beyond a “laziness” thing. He said that the benches in San Jose are extremely small (even with the backup goalie in a separate location) and that leads to guys having a hard time getting off the ice. I assume that he’s speaking from personal experience?
Maybe.. but man get out of the zone...... Landeskog made two really bad decision.... that one that overule a tying goal, and he was lazy on the almost wrap around goal losing his man and screening the goaltender. Was definitely not impress with that player in last nite game.
And he scored the OT GWG in Game 6 to get the Avs to Game 7. The ups and downs of hockey.
They play at the bench probably happens 5/6 times a game, it was just bad timing. Landeskog is not a normally a player I would consider “lazy”, which is why I was wondering if there was another reason he was standing there for so long.
Now it slooooooooooooooows way down. First and second rounds usually means there is a hockey game on at night.
How many horseshoes do the Sharks have? First they get a bogus 5 minute PP to beat Vegas and now they have a goal against reversed because of a lazy line change. In both examples, the loss is ultimately on the Vegas and Colorado but damn. In the words of Napoleon Dynamite, "Luckyyyy"
I like the Bruins against either of the two teams that are left. Leafs and Columbus bothered me more than either the Blues or Sharks do.
I really think we have a BIG advantage with Rask relative to all other remaining goalies. Yes, Jones/Binnington have been solid but I dont see them as same level as Rask.
There have been a lot of goals disallowed since they implemented the review rule so I don't think them reversing the call on the ice as a goal should be much of an issue. He took way too much time getting off the ice and owned up to it.I haven't seen this play yet, but from what they were saying on NHL Radio this morning and what I've read here, it sounds like this is yet another unnecessary controversy created by the need to "get calls right". If they didn't call offside on the ice and they challenged a goal and it was overturned because of what I've read and heard, then that absolutely sucks
There have been a lot of goals disallowed since they implemented the review rule so I don't think them reversing the call on the ice as a goal should be much of an issue. He took way too much time getting off the ice and owned up to it.