member 300185
Guest
^So you're not aware we would have lost Sparks on waivers if we sent him down?
We were losing 2 of the 3 in every situation.
this
^So you're not aware we would have lost Sparks on waivers if we sent him down?
We were losing 2 of the 3 in every situation.
I saw alright. 6 goals in 31 shots. If you put lipstick on a pig it is still a pigThats because you didnt pay attention.
Is that what you thought I did? Hmmm, perhaps you were trying to be funny yet most of us know how smart you are when it comes to hockey. Smart assed remarks dont bother me. Show us your intelligence.Footage leaks from OP's pre-gaming:
View attachment 144933
1st goal - Toews knocks the puck down from about 3'9" for the tip in. Not Sparks fault.
2nd goal - Debrincat with the tic tac tow play. Blown D coverage. Not Sparks fault.
3rd goal - Hayden's goal. Sparks stopped the first shot. No D coverage. No one covered Hayden. Hayden gets the second shot with no one even attempting to get to him. Not Sparks fault.
4th goal - Manning shot from point. Sparks completely screened on the shot. Not Sparks fault.
5th goal - Kane goes 5 hole. No coverage and Kane should not be left wide open. Sparks wishes he had that one back.
6th goal - Kane with the ripper. Off Hainsey and in. Not Sparks fault.
So for you people freaking out about Sparks, you are wrong. If you don't think so, go look at the replays.
People start piling on. Probably even some people who didnt watch the game are also piling on. Many of you are ready to run Sparks out of the league after his first game. Shame on most of you. Freaking gang mentality.
Not sure if some of you know this or not, but we won the game. Sparks only had 1 iffy goal.
Let me guess, most of you are also ignoring 3 highlight reel goals also. He is athletic. That toe save was freaking awesome.
"Oh, he is not NHL ready, he let 6 goals in". STOP!! Last season Freddy let in 5 goals 5 times and let in 6 goals 5 times.
Oh, did I mention he is young also.
Oh, did I mention it was his first game this year? Which doesn't really matter because only 1 goal was iffy.
Oh, did I mention he is also the back up goalie....not that it matters because 5 of those goals were not his fault.
"He is ECHL caliber". I heard that a few times. Are you serious? 5 of the goals are not his fault and he cannot be blamed for them.
Here is why the Hawks scored 6 goals....poor D zone coverage.
If you don't see the puck, you cannot stop it....most times.
If the puck is deflected in or re-directed at some point, then the goalie cannot be blamed.
But again, mostly blown D zone coverage.
Now lets see how many of you are going to jump on the "Sparks is not good" after 1 game....which most goals were not his fault.
Sparks was mobile, athletic, and well positioned. That is a fact. Blown D coverage is also a fact. Many tip ins and screens, was also a fact. He also had 3 highlight reel saves and that is a fact.
You can do that to a certain point but on Mannings goal, he had his own player and a Hawk 3 feet in front of him. Its not like he can skate out to them and say "hey, stop it, I cant' see the puck".
Thats because you didnt pay attention.
And why? Which of the 6 goals do you think were his fault?
People just want Sparks to be terrible.^
this
All of them, the guy sucks and has never proven that he has the talent to win in the NHL. You cant give up a 6 spot, you just can't. His movements suck his tracking sucks his reaction time sucks. The guy simply sucks. Stop pumping this snowflake narrative that the guy is good, and open your god damn eyes. He can't play at this level.And why? Which of the 6 goals do you think were his fault?
Yup.People just want Sparks to be terrible. Their old uncle didnt get the job, which means to attack Sparks.
He didn't impress in pre-season and his first game in the show he lets in 6
Is that what you thought I did? Hmmm, perhaps you were trying to be funny yet most of us know how smart you are when it comes to hockey. Smart assed remarks dont bother me. Show us your intelligence.
One thing I will agree is Sparks looks ugly in net. However Mac with the same style still became at least a below average backup goalie, so maybe Sparks can do it.I've never been a fan of Sparks, and it's not like he's been changing my mind lately.
I personally believe Pickard was the one we needed to keep, but that's just me.
Really?All of them, the guy sucks and has never proven that he has the talent to win in the NHL. You cant give up a 6 spot, you just can't. His movements suck his tracking sucks his reaction time sucks. The guy simply sucks. Stop pumping this snowflake narrative that the guy is good, and open your god damn eyes. He can't play at this level.
Ok. I apologize for not recognizing your humour. But lets break this down.I did think it was funny, didnt think you would. At least im being light hearted in poking fun at you, you're just straight up saying I dont understand hockey because im not praising 6 goals against on 30 shots.
I agree with you.
Good thread.
The Mac family members just cant take Sparks being good.
One thing I will agree is Sparks looks ugly in net. However Mac with the same style still became at least a below average backup goalie, so maybe Sparks can do it.
Um, no. His first game in the show he pitched a shutout, and was the first Leafs goalie ever to do that.
Why are people in love with Mac?
To the point, intelligent and did it in so few words. I am a fan of your post and I am not kidding.Um, no. His first game in the show he pitched a shutout, and was the first Leafs goalie ever to do that.
If you think 6 is acceptable for an nhl goalie, I have no interest in talking to you, you're just straight up wrong my dude. Avg tending is around 2.9 goals, educate yourself. This guy couldn't stop a kane shot beach ball.Really?
Tell me, which of the 6 goals scored would other goalies have stopped? Let me guess, every goalie in the league would have scored the 1st on where Toews knocked it down from over 3 feet in the air? Would they also have made not 1, not 2, but 3 highlight reel saves?
People just want Sparks to be terrible.
Because he's proven he can stop a puck and be a durable proven NHL backup caliber tender.