PrototypeX85
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2011
- 2,471
- 585
We have played 3 more games than the teams we just passed. Chill out
Have you seen our record the last 10 games versus their record over the past 10? We passed them for good.
We have played 3 more games than the teams we just passed. Chill out
LOL to Hughes or Kakko taking Kings to cup.Right. It matters in the short-term where all they're accomplishing is gaining a later first round pick. That's all winning does. Anyway, whatever. Enjoy the win. I'll wallow in my own misery knowing that the Kings will build their Stanley Cup victory lead over us when they get Hughes or Kakko.
LOL to Hughes or Kakko taking Kings to cup.
Why you bashing em? It’s his first time taking on bigger minutes now that Montour is gone. Cmon dude cut some Fricken slack.
A 12.7% greater chance of making it to the Promised Land. That's not going to keep me from enjoying a good win over the Sharks.They'd have a better chance than us. Can you win a Stanley Cup without a Top 3 draft pick? - Sportsnet.ca
Lol ive never put anyone on ignore but its temptingWhat are you yammering on about?
The Kings were always going to have a significantly better shot at both.Right. It matters in the short-term where all they're accomplishing is gaining a later first round pick. That's all winning does. Anyway, whatever. Enjoy the win. I'll wallow in my own misery knowing that the Kings will build their Stanley Cup victory lead over us when they get Hughes or Kakko.
That list is trying WAAAAAY too hard. Chicago won because they gamed the Cap just as much if not more than because of Toews and Kane. Seguin and Horton were bit players for Boston, Pittsburgh got back to back generational players, and lol at Brad Stuart being why the Redwings won in 2008. Niedermeier wasn’t the reason New Jersey won, Shanahan wasn’t behind those Detroit wins, and Olcyzk?They'd have a better chance than us. Can you win a Stanley Cup without a Top 3 draft pick? - Sportsnet.ca
Don't forget about Cogs. He's been playing with two offensive slugs the last few years. Silfvy will score 30 next season.silf has been the best signing. i can't wait for him next year. this entire year when he hasn't been stapled to kesler he's been at like a 0.7+ point pace.
Don't forget about Cogs. He's been playing with two offensive slugs the last few years. Silfvy will score 30 next season.
I like the idea of Steel. The swedes are good enough 2 way players that they can help ease Steel into his center responsibilities.25 ist what I expect if he stays with Rakell. They look good together. Somehow I feel Steel may be a good option for them at C. Do not mind Shore either.
Rakell is one of our worst defensive players IMO.I like the idea of Steel. The swedes are good enough 2 way players that they can help ease Steel into his center responsibilities.
Or maybe just go full sweedenI like the idea of Steel. The swedes are good enough 2 way players that they can help ease Steel into his center responsibilities.
I disagree. I think hes been under utilized. Hes starting to see more PK time under BM and he was always touted as a 2 way pkayer before he broke out as a scorerer. I think RC was just too engrossed with his checking line to expand on Rakell responsibilities.Rakell is one of our worst defensive players IMO.
Im okay with this idea as well. Let them fight it out for that center spot .Or maybe just go full sweeden
Rakell Lundestrom Silfverberg
I always thought
Ritchie Steel Kase would work out well
Granted I don't see both centers making the team next year