I think Ottawa made the right choice given their organization needs, direction, and current status. Just like I said in the NYR-OTT proposal thread, since much of it did become Staal vs. Lee: did Ottawa mess up? I'll explain below (a bit of a long read).
=====================
Here's my reasoning. Ottawa is always picking in the mid-low 20's. That is likely not to change any time son. Our scouts have proven the ability to find good, solid players in that range. But you can have the best scouts available working around the clock, every day, in preperation for the draft. If all the future stars are gone by the time you pick - as is often the case picking where the Sens do - you're plain out of luck (this is of course excluding the later round picks who become great players, but rather is considering the general "1st round prospects" that come along each year).
I think at #9 Ottawa had to take a swing at the fences. By taking Brian Lee over Marc Staal and Luc Bourdon they did just that. He's riskier, but that's just what I like about him. If he pans out to be the absolute best he can be, I don't think we are having this converstaion is 3 or 4 years. Everyone will be looking back saying "They [Ottawa] have done it again at the draft table.". And that's important. To have that one guy in the system who
can really hit it big for you. We can play it safe and go with players with rather certain second pairing upside in our usual spot each year. If not you can always trade up a bit. But not often will a team like Ottawa get a chance at a Brian Lee. Not often will they get a chance at a potential huge star. And even if it is just that - potential - I think it was the right move to take the chance. Thanks to some lottery luck getting the 9th overall selection we at least had the chance to do so, for the first time since 1997 (Marian Hossa at 12th overall, and we even apparently overreached at the time). I bet it'll be another good 3-5 years before we get that chance again.
It may one day prove to not have been the best choice but again, given the circumstances, I think we made the right pick for the "home run" potential. All we Sens fans can do now is sit back and hope the roll of the dice is favorable. The high regard Ottawa holds Lee in is at the very least positive, since our scouting staff has seldom steered us wrong before. We had (reporetedly) Lee ranked 4th overall on our list going into the draft in a year featuring Sidney Crosby. That's high praise from proven individuals. And our very own director of amateur scouting, Franky Jay, was the man responsible for taking Lee over Jack Johnson to the 2004 American WJC team. So obviously the Sens are very high on the kid.
Not to mention we have a log-jam as it is on the blueline. Having a project in Lee may be a good thing for us right about now, rather than another talented blueliner (like a Staal) knocking on the door needing playing time. Lee's smooth, mobile, puck moving game and right-handed shot also brings more of what we need to the table right now as opposed to the physical, more defense oriented games of Staal and Bourdon. Volchenkov, Lyamin, Meszaros, and Schubert already give us four good, young defensemen with similar games - all four of them left handed shots aswell. But there's no Brian Lee in the system in terms of style.
And hey, even if Lee does turn out worse than Bourdon and Staal he should still become better than a prospect we likely would have selected in our usual draft position, without the lottery. So the glass if half full on my table.