Should Crosby Still be #1?

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by WhiskeyYourTheDevils, Feb 17, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. WhiskeyYourTheDevils

    WhiskeyYourTheDevils yer leadin me astray Sponsor

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    17,933
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Strategy / Analytics
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Is he still considered the best prospect in the world, with the "breakout" of Ovechkin and Malkin?
     
  2. Shelby-villains

    Shelby-villains Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  3. NobodyBeatsTheWiz

    NobodyBeatsTheWiz Happy now?

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2004
    Messages:
    22,568
    Likes Received:
    671
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    The Burbs
    He still will be, regardless of if he deserves to be or not (just a prediction).
     
  4. CSKA

    CSKA Registered User

    Joined:
    May 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    there is no doubt about that
     
  5. Mr.Brownov*

    Mr.Brownov* Guest

    He's the 3rd best rookie of the world :sarcasm:
     
  6. Blind Gardien

    Blind Gardien nexus of the crisis

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    20,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Space Goat
    Location:
    Four Winds Bar
    I think of him as an NHL player, not a prospect. Most of the players ranked aren't really prospects, IMO. It's more like a Young Stars of Hockey ranking. Or a 20/20 Hindsight - Pt. I ranking of last year's top prospects. Which is fine, no knock on that.
     
  7. eggplant

    eggplant Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    3rd, you're being generous
     
  8. Anksun

    Anksun Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2002
    Messages:
    3,616
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Montreal
    Home Page:
    No question in my mind.

    This is not the rookie race where people are always fast to makes us all remember the age difference doesnt worth anything.

    This is the top 50 list and the 2 years gap makes (should) in my mind Crosby ahead of Ovechkin.
     
  9. Pepper

    Pepper Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,543
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Ovechkin is the clear no.1 at this point but Crosby will be the no.1 on the list regardless.
     
  10. Doomsday Device

    Doomsday Device Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,510
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    Gary Coleman's Finishing School for Doomsday Devic
    Home Page:
    Seeing as this is a top prospect list and a Calder Trophy ranking, I'm not sure why there would be a problem with him being 1st (if he actually is of course).
     
  11. oil slick

    oil slick Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2004
    Messages:
    7,593
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Ovechkin is the better rookie... but he has about 2 years on Crosby... the difference in a player from 18 to 20 is huge. If I were a betting man, I would say Crosby at age 20 will be better than any other player at age 20.
     
  12. Allsmokenopancake

    Allsmokenopancake Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Donegal, Ireland
    According to the hockey news, future watch edition, ovechkin and crosby are no longer considered prospects, their lists were compiled in late november and early december.

    Malkin is the #1 consensus prospect, with Jack Johnson being #2.

    The only cap on it is Eric Fehr at #30

    Mark Andre Fleury is # 6 and the pens also have another one there too, can't remember offhand who it is.

    Great read throughout, breaks down the top 50, as well as the top 5 for each team, some are in the NHL now, and rank lower than other prospects in the organization (brooks laich for the caps for example, caps fan so using them as my point) but its based on overall potential so fehr, chris bourque are rated above them.

    Worth buying, good story on the state of american hockey, and the grassroots struggles of getting people into hockey too.

    Article about phil kessel and a 2007 draft future watch bit about Angelo Esposito (no relation to the other espositos)
     
  13. Rico Fatastic

    Rico Fatastic Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Echoing what others have said, Crosby does still deserve to be #1. And that's simply because these are prospect rankings and not Calder rankings. I think Crosby's the 3rd best rookie this year, but as far as prospect rankings go, I'd be willing to bet that 2 years from now, Crosby will be better than Ovechkin is right now, just as I'd be willing to bet that Crosby is better now than Ovechkin was 2 years ago.

    Edit: However, I do think that while they are technically considered rookies by HF's criteria, I think it's still rather silly to consider most of these guys prospects if they've already secured a permanent spot in the NHL.
     
  14. dustinbrownfan

    dustinbrownfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Hampshire
     
  15. ryz

    ryz Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,245
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    He should be #1 and I'd be shocked if he wasn't. From a pure "prospect" point of view he is years younger than the other possible #1's and is just as good. If AO wants to be the clear cut #1 he should more then 4 points up on a guy that 2 years younger than him. I'd assume Phaneuf and Malkin are #3 and #4 but they don't match up either. Phaneuf is a Dman and that pretty much docks points automatically and Malkin isn't doing it in the NHL, which pretty much kills him too.
     
  16. Allsmokenopancake

    Allsmokenopancake Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Donegal, Ireland
     
  17. Habsaku

    Habsaku Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2003
    Messages:
    5,554
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Is the beejee
    Location:
    Montreal
    Home Page:
    Without the shadow of a doubt, the guy is 18 years old for gods sakes.
     
  18. John Flyers Fan

    John Flyers Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,416
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    I'd still list Crosby #1.

    If I had the choice to add any one to my team for the rest of this season I'd take Ovechkin without much hesitation.

    If I'm selecting who I want for the next 15 years, I'd give Crosby the slight edge.
     
  19. daver

    daver Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2003
    Messages:
    15,731
    Likes Received:
    795
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Home Page:
    Why do you think Ovechkin is the clear no.1?
     
  20. Hockeymom67

    Hockeymom67 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Personal trainer
    Location:
    Montreal
    Hello ? :dunno: Where have you been ?
     
  21. Zen Arcade

    Zen Arcade Bigger than Kiss Sponsor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2004
    Messages:
    21,259
    Likes Received:
    4,277
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    But this is a prospects rating, not the calder race.
     
  22. Evilo

    Evilo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    41,619
    Likes Received:
    1,259
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    France
    Hmm, let's see, when was the last time an 18 year old was in the top 10 in scoring after two thirds (roughly) of the season?
    In any case, I said last time that the two guys should be toed, and I stand by it.
     
  23. Jaded-Fan

    Jaded-Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,774
    Likes Received:
    2,975
    Trophy Points:
    186
    I think with these two even if you cut off one of their toes they still would be in the top ten scoring.
     
  24. BobMarleyNYR

    BobMarleyNYR Registered User

    Joined:
    May 2, 2004
    Messages:
    3,944
    Likes Received:
    96
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Occupation:
    panhandler
    Location:
    Alphabet
    Ovechkin and Malkin are both a good deal older than Crosby, especially Ovechkin. He was ready for the NHL in '03, so he probably won't get TOO much better than he already is. Crosby, as much a spoiled, whimpering brat as he shown tgo be, has miles higher to go, and you can see it in his play.

    I'm starting to believe Malkin might be even better than Ovechkin in the long run. Crosby beats them both combined.
     
  25. Evilo

    Evilo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    41,619
    Likes Received:
    1,259
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    France
    :lol:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"