Helistin
Dustin's equilibrium
Being that she was completely intoxicated at the time, does her statement have any value?
You mean the latest statement? Not really , she wants to protect the abuser and the familys income.
Being that she was completely intoxicated at the time, does her statement have any value?
The quote where she called watson "handsy"You mean the latest statement?
Basically. All I learned about battered woman's syndrome it's really hard to tell one way or the other. This is one of the most depressing things about domestic abuse beyond the abuse itself that women feel pressure to lie and protect their abuser. It could be that she's telling the truth but it's taken an awfully long time for the truth to come out so it's pretty suspicious.So she's either lying to protect Watson's reputation or she's telling the truth and making it even harder for victims to come forward by adding to the fear of not being taken seriously. Nice job either way.
Basically. All I learned about battered woman's syndrome it's really hard to tell one way or the other. This is one of the most depressing things about domestic abuse beyond the abuse itself that women feel pressure to lie and protect their abuser. It could be that she's telling the truth but it's taken an awfully long time for the truth to come out so it's pretty suspicious.
The quote where she called watson "handsy"
I mean she may have been drunk both times
You got a source on this? And what about her "handsy" remark?And it also came out later that they determined those were not marks made by Watson.
Of course it does. I've been wasted plenty of times and I've never gone and made stuff up to a police officer before.Being that she was completely intoxicated at the time, does her statement have any value?
Is there any way to identify a false claim?Basically. All I learned about battered woman's syndrome it's really hard to tell one way or the other. This is one of the most depressing things about domestic abuse beyond the abuse itself that women feel pressure to lie and protect their abuser. It could be that she's telling the truth but it's taken an awfully long time for the truth to come out so it's pretty suspicious.
What good does it make for her to speak up now and contradict her previous statement. It only makes her a confirmed liar and nobody can take what she says at face value. Do you believe she was lying about him getting handsy on her or do you believe she is lying he touched her so she doesn't lose half of his salary. While anger and money are both viable motives to lie, I tend to believe she's lying in her current statement, because she's losing money in this.You would have her keep silent even if she's telling the truth? What if you were the one falsely accused of domestic violence or sexual assault? Would you honestly want no one to come to your defense?
You would have her keep silent even if she's telling the truth? What if you were the one falsely accused of domestic violence or sexual assault? Would you honestly want no one to come to your defense, least of all the person that you didn't assault, for fear of how it might discourage real victims?
You got a source on this? And what about her "handsy" remark?
Why plead no contest then? Youre innocent, fight it. Youre white and rich, you have every chance to prove your innocence in court.
This action is very predictable from what we've seen from other woman dating celebrities and actually having the abuse documented on video.
"Handsy" is a 100% unambiguous statement given the context."Handsy" is an ambiguous statement, the cop should of asked for clarification. If a woman were to tell me their significant other was "handsy" I would assume they have a healthy sex life haha.
and ? The court of public opinion has nothing to do with the court of law.Maybe 20 years ago.
Check out the lynch mobbed on HF when it was announced
Why plead no contest then? Youre innocent, fight it. Youre white and rich, you have every chance to prove your innocence in court.
This action is very predictable from what we've seen from other woman dating celebrities and actually having the abuse documented on video.
What does it imply then?"Handsy" is a 100% unambiguous statement given the context.
Basically. All I learned about battered woman's syndrome it's really hard to tell one way or the other. This is one of the most depressing things about domestic abuse beyond the abuse itself that women feel pressure to lie and protect their abuser. It could be that she's telling the truth but it's taken an awfully long time for the truth to come out so it's pretty suspicious.
In the context of a police officer interviewing a woman who moments prior had a physical altercation with her husband, it implies he sometimes lays his hands on her. Good lord.What does it imply then?
Lays his hands on her in what manner?In the context of a police officer interviewing a woman who moments prior had a physical altercation with her husband, it implies he sometimes lays his hands on her. Good lord.
In an aggressive manner, again, because they were just in some sort of physical altercation.Lays his hands on her in what manner?
What if she didn't mean 'altercation' at all?In an aggressive manner, again, because they were just in some sort of physical altercation.