shea weber or cam barker

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Chrisd, Feb 1, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. Chrisd

    Chrisd Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,545
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    who do you take and why
     
  2. Blind Gardien

    Blind Gardien nexus of the crisis

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    20,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Space Goat
    Location:
    Four Winds Bar
    I take Weber. He's more hardcore d. "In theory" Barker might get a few more points, but even after this WJC, I still find Barker to be a bit soft around the edges, not quite fully engaged at times.
     
  3. Chrisd

    Chrisd Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,545
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Does Weber have some offensive upside, or just strictly D?
     
  4. Gnashville

    Gnashville HFBoards Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    11,582
    Likes Received:
    1,540
    Trophy Points:
    218
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Rinne's Glove Side
    Weber Judge for your self
     
  5. Habsfan18

    Habsfan18 Registered User

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    26,493
    Likes Received:
    1,461
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Ontario
    Home Page:
    Shea Weber will be awesome. So will Barker, but I'd choose Weber.

    He was ranked 4th on this year's THN Future Watch.
     
  6. rigger

    rigger Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    8,950
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Dream Weaver
    Location:
    Jessica Alba's Dream
    I would take Weber because I think he is more of a Pronger type of player and I see Barker as more of a Neidermayer player, I don't think either will develop into the players I am comparing them too but I prefer the Pronger style over Neids, thus my prefernce lies with Weber.
     
  7. Hadoop

    Hadoop The GOAT Generation

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    4,994
    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Toronto
    I may be in minority but I'd talke Barkler FOR SURE.

    P.S. You should make a poll for this comparison if you haven't already.
     
  8. hockeyfan125

    hockeyfan125 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Messages:
    20,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Weber in a NANOsecond.

    Not a Barker fan at all.
     
  9. GaryU

    GaryU Registered User

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Schaumburg,Il
    We in Chicago are happy with Barker. Watching Barker is like watching Doug Wilson, and that ain't bad.
    I'm sure Weber will be good too.
     
  10. Brock

    Brock Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    10,916
    Likes Received:
    474
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    The GTA
    Home Page:
    I'd take Weber.

    I think his offensive game is severely underrated and he could be a pretty decent point producer at the NHL level, along with being an animal defensively.
     
  11. nuckfan insk

    nuckfan insk Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,277
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Occupation:
    hockey guru
    Location:
    saskatoon Sask
    weber for sure ! in medicine hat barker is not a fan favorite ! barker is lazy. weber will shut you down, beat you up, and can play the pp. after watching them as a pair in the 05 wjc i would be inclined to put weber right next to phaneuf. to think calgary could have got him with pick 39 but they took ramholt (bust) instead. the flames would have the top d unit in the league for the next 15 years. weber can do everything barker can and more, plus he plays physical
     
  12. Flames Draft Watcher

    Flames Draft Watcher Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary
    Home Page:
    Weber. I've seen Barker a bunch in the dub and at world junior camps and the world juniors and he always underwhelms me.

    Weber is the real deal. Big, strong, physical, decent skills.
     
  13. Ti-girl

    Ti-girl Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,913
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Teaching
    Location:
    Merida, Mexico
    Home Page:
    Weber HANDS DOWN.

    I'm a Tiger fan and he gives people here ulcers. When he shoots he CAN'T hit the net. He doesn't hustle and is soft along the boards.

    Yeah he's not exactly my favorite player.
     
  14. SmokeyClause

    SmokeyClause Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    9,999
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    M&A Consultant
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Home Page:
    I think it depends on what you are looking for. Barker is going to be more offensive, but won't provide that shut down element that Weber has the potential for. I think Weber has untapped potential on offense. He's got a hard shot from the point and makes good outlet passes. He's gotta work on his stickhandling though. For the Preds, there is little question they would take Weber over Barker. We need Weber's strength. He has very strong arms and can move people out of the way even when he can't get a good base under him. He's just a strong, no nonsense hockey player that'll shorten the season for a player or two in his career. He dropped Datsyuk in his first or second game up and stood Lang up as well. Definitely has stuff he needs to work on and needs more seasoning, but he should be a force.
     
  15. Slats432

    Slats432 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2002
    Messages:
    12,821
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Home Page:
    I prefer Weber. Barker has underwhelmed me when I watch him because he reminds me of poor man's Brewer in some respects. Tools are all there, but he doesn't take them and utilize them.

    On the other hand, Weber takes a decent tool box and uses everything at his disposal and does everything very well.

    As a comparison. The nastiness of Jason Smith, smart defensively, with far better offensive instincts.
     
  16. GaryU

    GaryU Registered User

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Location:
    Schaumburg,Il
    Just because he (Barker) doesn't put guys THRU the boards doesn't mean he doesn't take them off the play. Why do so many think being positionally sound is a bad thing? As I mentioned before, I watched Doug Wilson's entire career, and never saw him hurt anyone. He was still a great D-man. He, like Barker had no wasted motion. And he won a Norris.
     
  17. jcoldwell

    jcoldwell Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow, tough call. Depends on what you really want on your d. They both are potential top pairing dmen. But for me it would be Barker then Weber right after if I had back-to-back picks.
     
  18. Ti-girl

    Ti-girl Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,913
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Teaching
    Location:
    Merida, Mexico
    Home Page:
    Well when I mean soft along the boards I don't mean he doesn't slam people into the boards, I mean he lets people walk right through him and get a clean shot on Keetley from the slot.
     
  19. Stars-Preds

    Stars-Preds Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    477
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think both will be very good NHL defensemen. Barker will probably score a few more points, but I would argue Weber will be the more valuable defenseman. He's a big, positionally strong, physical defenseman. He has an underrated slapshot that generally stays low and hard. I expect him to be a regular in the Preds lineup by next season.
     
  20. WhiskeyYourTheDevils

    WhiskeyYourTheDevils yer leadin me astray Sponsor

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    18,017
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Strategy / Analytics
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    weber and its not even close. although he did get completely owned by sidney crosby at the mem cup.
     
  21. Thundermare

    Thundermare Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who?

    I think Barker is the beter player... But I'd still take weber due to the style

    I love to watch him hit... and pretty awesome package too
     
  22. DisgruntledHawkFan

    DisgruntledHawkFan Blackhawk Down

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2004
    Messages:
    38,092
    Likes Received:
    1,989
    Trophy Points:
    187
    Occupation:
    Cranes and ****
    Location:
    Chicago
    Is it true that Barker is bored playing in jr. and wants to play in the big leagues?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"