Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
It's a small difference. Swap any of the elite D's around, save for Karlsson and Burns because their offense driving is crazy high compared to the field and there's literally nothing that changes. It does change the make up of a team, this I can agree, teams will use different breakouts/pairings/assigments/etc but the overall quality of play is the same. This has been proved over and over, Pens thrived with Letang as their 1D, with Schultz, with Gonchar, Bruins thrived with Chara, and now they thrive with Krug... Vegas too, why are they so good if they use Engelland so much ?To say it's small is to say they bring the exact same game with a little modification. They don't. They play very different styles and bring different elements to the team. The only place where they have some similarity is their powerplay shot which Weber has a better slapper and Subban is a superior passer.
It's an entirely different game played from the blueline out depending on if Weber or Subban is on the ice. To say it's a small difference is like saying there's a small difference on if Jeff Petry or Aaron Ekblad is out there because they had a three point difference this season.
Fact is, top end talent matters, but it matters a lot less than people think.
That's not to say the Habs didn't lose the trade, everyone and their mother knows what happened and they didn't get fair value, but acting like Subban is a demi-god compared to Weber is foolish, and there's also little indication that Weber "fell off substantially" since 2012.