Moving 1 3rd liner isn't going to make or break the rebuild and I think it's best for both backlund and the team if we move backlund
Keeping the soon-to-be 30 year old over the 24 year old is terrible asset management and completely contrary to the concept of a rebuild. And it doesn't help the team whatsoever to keep a second/third line tweener like Stajan for veteran leadership when the team already has Glencross, Hudler, Jones and likely one of Stempniak or Cammalleri upfront.
There's certainly an argument to be made for trading Backlund for defensive help, although that has been less necessary with the addition of Smid. There's an argument for keeping Stajan for veteran leadership, albeit a weak one. But there's no rational argument to be made for keeping an almost 30 year old vet who's peaked over a 24 year old who still has room for growth in the first year of a rebuild. It's just asinine.
And I know that sounds contradictory but it's not if you think about. In this case, you're not picking Stajan over Backlund, but rather trading the latter because there's a deal too good to pass up and keeping the former because of 'veteran leadership.' If there was no deal for Backlund, they'd keep both.