World Cup: set to expand to 40 teams from 2026 as part of Fifa reform plan

Discussion in 'Soccer' started by Power Man, Dec 3, 2015.

  1. Ceremony

    Ceremony ______________

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    105,320
    Likes Received:
    3,895
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Home Page:
    That'll be some group with Indonesia, Kuwait, Bhutan, Antarctica, Fiji, Germany, North Korea and Eritrea. What a spectacle. There is qualifying for a reason.
     
  2. Pavel Buchnevich

    Pavel Buchnevich AV AND GORTON OUT

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Messages:
    35,243
    Likes Received:
    6,967
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New York
    This is what would've been added for the last WC with 40 teams.

    AFC: Uzbekistan and Jordan
    CAF: Likely Senegal and Egypt
    CONCACAF: None
    CONMEBOL: None
    UEFA: Likely Ukraine, maybe Sweden, Iceland or Romania.
    Oceania: New Zealand

    I think the clear problems with this is not that you are adding so many terrible teams, although Uzbekistan, Jordan and New Zealand are pretty bad, but its the distribution of spots that doesn't make sense.

    If you are adding teams it should be

    AFC: 3
    CAF: 4.5
    CONCACAF: 6
    CONMEBOL: 7
    UEFA: 20
     
  3. Panteras

    Panteras perennial loser

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    9,955
    Likes Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Television sky
    I love seeing new teams in the WC, but 40 teams is a lot. Thats 2 extra groups, as it is it's already a month long.
     
  4. Bluebirds Boyo

    Bluebirds Boyo Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Fully support this, just because it'll make Australia feel a bit stupid. :D
     
  5. Shrimper

    Shrimper Trick or ruddy treat

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    101,274
    Likes Received:
    3,080
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Essex
    Home Page:
    32 is fine.

    If they want more African teams to qualify then prove they deserve it. They fail at every World Cup nearly.
     
  6. Jussi

    Jussi Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    70,966
    Likes Received:
    3,341
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The List Of Jericho
    Don't matter, we still won't qualify.
     
  7. DaveG

    DaveG Noted Jerk

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    42,865
    Likes Received:
    18,762
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Brewer/Medical Software
    Location:
    Winston-Salem NC
    Awards:
    better then South America? lol. Hell even CONCACAF has a much better claim to deserving more spots, and we just flat out don't, 3.5 is about right for us under the current setup until we can start producing results consistently beyond the US and Mexico. But expand to 40? ****, might as well take the entire Hex.

    Bingo

    About what I'd want as well, but no way in hell would they ever take spots away from AFC and CAF when they flat out dominate the vote in terms of sheer numbers. Whole damn thing needs to be blown up.
     
  8. Moncherry

    Moncherry Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,155
    Likes Received:
    463
    Trophy Points:
    94
    CONCACAF don't deserve more spots than CAF. They already scrape the bottom of the barrel with four, Honduras are useless. Africa is a deeper confederation. USA, Mexico and Costa Rica may have done better than most African teams at the World Cup recently but those are the only CONCACAF teams capable of doing anything. The pool of teams who miss out in Africa is stronger than the likes of Panama, Jamaica, Haiti, etc.

    Granting any more spots to CONCACAF or CONMEBOL will drastically dilute the qualification process in those confederations. If they're going down that road I think they should unify the qualifying for those two. The one or two South American teams that would make it would be a damn sight better than adding two or more CONCACAF teams. Mexico and USA would probably still qualify and if they can't beat out the weaker teams in CONMEBOL then they wouldn't deserve to anyway.

    Of course, this is speaking strictly from a perspective of merit, which won't be the whole basis for any expansion of the World Cup.
     
  9. DyerMaker66*

    DyerMaker66* Guest

    You're saying the 33rd team in the world is ****? USA, Ghana, and Poland are ****?

    Canada was the lowest ranking member at the 2000 Gold Cup and won. It's much different from hockey where only the best 6 or so nations even have a chance at winning and know how to play.
     
  10. DyerMaker66*

    DyerMaker66* Guest

    Yeah with every country in the world there it'd automatically be a spectacle. :laugh:
     
  11. Pavel Buchnevich

    Pavel Buchnevich AV AND GORTON OUT

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Messages:
    35,243
    Likes Received:
    6,967
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New York
    CAF performs worse at WC's than CONCACAF does, so I don't know why they deserve more spots. You can say that CAF is deeper, but if we are adding spots to each confederation, we are still arguing over bad teams who likely won't win a game at the tournament. Is Senegal better than Panama? Is Egypt better than Jamaica?
     
  12. Hesher

    Hesher Sagan for President

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Messages:
    4,609
    Likes Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    Slovakia
    32 is enough IMO.
     
  13. xavi4life

    xavi4life Mr. Irreverent

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,626
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Yes, I'm saying they're ****. I don't care to watch any of those teams play.
     
  14. Moncherry

    Moncherry Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,155
    Likes Received:
    463
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Deserve in the sense that if you were to expand the tournament, based on the size and relative depth of their confederation they would certainly be up for a couple more spots.

    And yeah, I would consider the likes of Senegal, Egypt, Tunisia etc to be better than CONCACAF's secondary teams, no question.
     
  15. DyerMaker66*

    DyerMaker66* Guest

    I do. US tied Italy and Ghana beat the US. They can all clearly hold their own against good competition.
     
  16. Basement Cat

    Basement Cat Frank Drebin

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    11,893
    Likes Received:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    Saying those 3 teams are **** makes one lose all credibility :laugh::laugh::laugh:
     
  17. ForumNamePending

    ForumNamePending Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    2,265
    Likes Received:
    375
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Perhaps they should introduce both a "young gunz" and a "best of the rest" team!:sarcasm:
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2015
  18. NHL Dude 120

    NHL Dude 120 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    2,438
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Occupation:
    Dragon Slayer
    Location:
    Ottawa
    Honestly other than OFC getting 1 berth im ok with 32 teams.
     
  19. njdevsfn95

    njdevsfn95 Help JJJ, Sprite.

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    31,348
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    131
    More teams less need for bribes, right? :sarcasm:

    Option A:

    40 teams...8 groups of 5. Top 2 advance is the easiest to get to 16. Each nation gets 1 more game but knockout stages do not change. (More money for everyone)

    Option B:
    Top 3 advance. 1 gets a bye into Rd of 16. 2s vs 3s in an opening round? Each nation gets 1 more game and 60% of nations get at least 2. (More money for everyone and even more money for some and a ******** more money for FIFA :D)

    While neither option is great, I do not like the idea of having "3 best 3rd place teams" or whatever it would be advance. This limits everything to the play in a particular group deciding who moves on.
     
  20. Bures Elbow

    Bures Elbow Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,827
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    71
    32 teams is perfect

    40 would be ********.

    Stupidity running amok in footy right now
     
  21. misterchainsaw

    misterchainsaw Garbo is coming

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,170
    Likes Received:
    107
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    This is the rumor I read, and I agree. I'm completely fine with it. In fact, expanding the round robin to 4 games instead of 3 will allow better teams more of a chance to overcome a bad result early in the round. The extra teams they will be adding in will at the very least be competitive with the mid-tier Cup teams with a definite chance to steal some points.
     
  22. chasespace

    chasespace Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    9,045
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Gator Nation
    If those teams are **** then by that standard there's only, what, three good teams?
     
  23. Power Man

    Power Man Grrrr

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    24,430
    Likes Received:
    477
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    221B Baker Street
    Wrong.
    They won the WC in 98
     
  24. King 88

    King 88 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,750
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    81
    No thank you if anything more european countries. World cup has already too many countries that dont deserve to be there.
     
  25. njdevsfn95

    njdevsfn95 Help JJJ, Sprite.

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    31,348
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    131
    6 of 13 UEFA nations made it into the knockout stages in 2010 and 2014. That's not exactly the success that would deserve more teams.

    I would expect 2018 to be as successful as 2006 since it is another "home" tournament.

    Adding any number of nations will simply expand the list of "probably doesnt belong" nations.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"