Speculation: Seguin v. Panarin

Seguin or Panarin


  • Total voters
    215
  • Poll closed .

milehigh11

Registered User
Mar 4, 2014
911
547
Mile High State
The Avalanche will take both and have the cap space to sign both as well as their RFAs. Thanks Mack and Landy for your bargain contracts.

Landy / Mack / Rants
Panarin / Seguin / Jost or Kaut

looks good to me
 

WhatWhat

Registered User
Aug 7, 2014
5,685
1,119
If you are going to sit there and say Seguin would not be an upgrade over Kadri you shouldn't be watching hockey. He would be an upgrade over Tavares and Matthews. Prove me wrong, ill wait.
No one is saying that tho... They just said the leafs are stacked at C. That is a fact, it is an objective statement. When you have someone like Kadri at 3C there is no point in spending on a guy like Seguin. Toronto would be way better off going after Panarin assuming the 2 players in question are equally available to them.
 

Goalie guy

Registered User
Jul 8, 2011
3,063
444
Taylor MI
From my point of view the Wings have wingers and we lost our number 1 C, Holland needs to be all over Seguin if he hits FA.
 

Unspecified

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Apr 29, 2015
6,106
2,980
No one is saying that tho... They just said the leafs are stacked at C. That is a fact, it is an objective statement. When you have someone like Kadri at 3C there is no point in spending on a guy like Seguin. Toronto would be way better off going after Panarin assuming the 2 players in question are equally available to them.

"Sequin wouldn't be an upgrade over any of them"

Read back a few chief!. He is stating that Seguin would not be an upgrade over any of them. Thus meaning not as good as the 3 we have or Seguin would not be an upgrade over any of them. Perhaps you should read back more than the post quoted before you chime in.
 

WhatWhat

Registered User
Aug 7, 2014
5,685
1,119
"Sequin wouldn't be an upgrade over any of them"

Read back a few chief!. He is stating that Seguin would not be an upgrade over any of them. Thus meaning not as good as the 3 we have or Seguin would not be an upgrade over any of them. Perhaps you should read back more than the post quoted before you chime in.

Might want to add the entire context there...

"You missed their point. Stacked at center didn't mean they have the 3 best centers in the league and Seguin wouldn't be an upgrade over any of them. It meant they're covered down the middle with top talent and could use an elite winger more than an elite center."

He is saying they are good at C... He is saying that them not wanting Seguin isnt him saying all 3 Toronto C > Seguin. Its because there is no need to pay an other premium on C when you have a top 2 Center core in the league. Also this started when you decided to chime in out of nowhere defending Seguin with

"Kind of" stacked, Seguin would be the best player on that team hands down."

when the guy you were replying to said nothing other than

"Matthews, Tavares, Kadri......I don’t think Stacked quite covers it"

That is an objectively true statement and you just come across as insecure needing to pop in and claim your player would be better when he wasnt even in that guys post.

Maybe you should learn to read with context chief! Perhaps you should look at what someone said before you chime in.
 

loyaltotheend

Registered User
May 5, 2016
1,254
411
St. John's
"Sequin wouldn't be an upgrade over any of them"

Read back a few chief!. He is stating that Seguin would not be an upgrade over any of them. Thus meaning not as good as the 3 we have or Seguin would not be an upgrade over any of them. Perhaps you should read back more than the post quoted before you chime in.

Hilarious you're reading it wrong and arguing with everyone else.

It doesn't say what you think...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->