Post-Game Talk: SCQ #2 - 8/3/20 | RANGERS @ hurricanes

[True Blue]

I dont think ADA is on the block, and no real loss of production in moving Strome.

Who else is trending towards 70 points with Panarin?

And while you may not have, there are plenty of people that are trying to ship DeAngelo out.

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

We are all asking where our impact players are. It may be worth noting their previous postseason records:

Zibanejad
Seasons Active: 9 Postseasons: 4 Series Won: 2

Panarin
Seasons Active: 5 Postseasons: 5 Series Won: 1

DeAngelo
Seasons Active: 4 Postseasons: 1 Series Won: 0

Trouba
Seasons Active: 7 Postseasons: 4 Series Won: 2

Maybe our impact players aren't showing up in the postseason because they aren't impact players in the postseason.

This is truly ridiculous.

 

[Avery16]

Who else is trending towards 70 points with Panarin?

And while you may not have, there are plenty of people that are trying to ship DeAngelo out.

Thats not enough to give Strome a multi-year at market value.

Well those people are just wrong.

 

[Avery16]

This is truly ridiculous.

Its a ridiculous concept that players without a winning record in the postseason might not carry us in the postseason? Ok, noted.

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

Not that it matters much now. But likely considering Another 4 month break incoming, I would like to see This lineup starting the game tonight (barring injuries). DQ can irrationally do his random line mixes a bit later in the game...

Kreider - Zib - Buch
Pan - Strome - Kakko
Lemmy - Chytil - Krav
Digi - Howden - Gauthier (If he can play - Otherwise Fogarty)

Smith - Trouba
Lindgren - Fox
Hajek - ADA

Czar
Georgia

No depth for a run here. Peter Worrell. where art thou? Have you perhaps kidnapped @RangerBoy and are holed up somewhere playing a marathon run of NHL-20 living off Papa Johns takeaway specials? I worry...

There's no reason to keep Buch on the top line. Bad penalty to start the game.

Makes little sense to insert Kravtsov at this point. Let Gauthier play on top-6 line and Kakko the other.

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

Its a ridiculous concept that players without a winning record in the postseason might not carry us in the postseason? Ok, noted.

When it's a team sport it is. There are many lesser player who might have a better playoff record. You'd prefer them? You'd take Connor Sheary over Mike Gartner?

 

[Avery16]

When it's a team sport it is.

The OP specifies our impact players not being an impact in this series. What's your point?

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

The OP specifies our impact players not being an impact in this series. What's your point?

My point is you're taking individuals' team's playoff records. And doesn't really tell you anything. But I guess it sounds good.

 

[Avery16]

My point is you're taking individuals' team's playoff records. And doesn't really tell you anything. But I guess it sounds good.

It tells you what it intends to tell you, that our impact players lack winning postseason experience.

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

Who else is trending towards 70 points with Panarin?

And while you may not have, there are plenty of people that are trying to ship DeAngelo out.

Come on —70 point players grow on trees, TB. And any player can help Panarin have his most productive season.

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

It tells you what it intends to tell you, that our impact players lack winning postseason experience.

Hot take alert.

 

[Shesterkybomb]

There's no reason to keep Buch on the top line. Bad penalty to start the game.

Makes little sense to insert Kravtsov at this point. Let Gauthier play on top-6 line and Kakko the other.

Buch has been one of our best workers the last two games imo. If anyone comes off its Kreider imo.

 

[Avery16]

Hot take alert.

Wait, now I'm confused. Are you complaining about the post because you disagree with it or complaining because you agree?

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

Buch has been one of our best workers the last two games imo. If anyone comes off its Kreider imo.

Agree to disagree. I think Buch has been bad all series.

 

[Shesterkybomb]

It tells you what it intends to tell you, that our impact players lack winning postseason experience.

The old saying, I need experience to get a job but I need a job to get experience.

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

Wait, now I'm confused. Are you complaining about the post because you disagree with it or complaining because you agree?

I think it's a hot take: something that might sound good, but really isn't founded on much.

 

[Oscar Lindberg]

Agree to disagree. I think Buch has been bad all series.

We're clearly not watching the same player if that is your conclusion watching Buch haha

 

[Avery16]

I think it's a hot take: something that might sound good, but really isn't founded on much.

If my "hot take" is that our impact players lack winning postseason experience, and I base it on the number of postseason series they have won, where is the gap? It sounds like youre trying really hard to find something to complain about.

 

[Amazing Kreiderman]

I'm glad you made it.

Grow up

 

[Avery16]

Grow up

Get thicker skin.

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

If my "hot take" is that our impact players lack winning postseason experience, and I base it on the number of postseason series they have won, where is the gap? It sounds like youre trying really hard to find something to complain about.

A lot of irony here.

How many players have a winning postseason record?

 

[Amazing Kreiderman]

Get thicker skin.

Alright, love. Whatever works for you