I think many Sens fans have unrealistic expectations. They're David (Ottawa) vs Goliath to (
Toronto/Montreal/NY) but yet expect their team to swim with the other big fish. But in reality Ottawa is a much smaller market stuck between giants. And even if you're one of those rich teams, success isn't guaranteed either, particularly if you look at Montreal/Toronto the last 2 decades. Its probably Sens fans have been spoiled from 1997 to 2007 but it's a cycle and very few teams stay at the top longer than that.
From 2009-10 to 2016-17 (before the fall from grace), Sens had an overall record of 304-240-78 and 686 pts. Nothing exceptional but still good for 18th in the NHL during that period of time. Made the playoffs 5 out of these 8 seasons and won 3 rounds (1 ECF). Again, nothing exceptional but several teams didn't fare much better. It was a decade dominated by the Bruins, Hawks, Penguins, Capitals, Blues, Kings, Sharks... Pretty much all the rest had mitigated results. Just making the playoffs should be considered a success nowadays, with so much parity in the league.
Then of course, what happened in 2018 kinda ruined everything where we had to endure the firesale of elite players in their prime. I see that Murray gets some criticism by some (who are probably very little informed about the team) but he laid an incredible foundation that should have been built around (Karlsson, Zibanejad, Stone, Chabot, Hoffman, Dzingel, White, Wolanin, Turris, Pageau, etc). Sure, MacArthur and Methot injuries (and Ryan too) and other declines didn't help the team but there was enough talent on the roster and in the pool to build a contender. Of course, you need an owner that is financially committed towards that goal (pay the core, best coaching staff possible, goaltending, support players, etc)
Dorion inherited a lot of great/nice assets while Murray inherited a first line and a few good players (Vermette and Fisher and vets approaching decline like Phillips and Neil). The team had non-existent depth back then and a very very weak prospect pool. Yet, in just a few years, (2008 to 2012), Murray brought several great building blocks but unfortunately he started to have health issues and the rest is history. Melnyk replaced him by somebody who was totally green for the job, a great scout and head of development but was probably not ready to be a NHL GM.
In summary, the results for the decade were pretty much average. If you think the decade was "terrible" then maybe it's because you have really high standards (and probably very unrealistic). It's cool if you push to achieve excellence in life but it's the exception and not the norm.
I don't get the question....
Was cheering for the Senators worth it? Worth what? I didn't give anything up in order to cheer for the team.
Also the whole "if you didn't win a championship then it was a wasted decade" is nonsense. The two stand out runs prior to this decade were in 2003 and 2007, we got two great runs in 2015 and 2017 on top of a publicly humiliating the Habs in 2013. It was a great decade for a tiny team with no money that is owned by a decrepid con artist.
If, when I die, the Sens haven't won a Cup, will my fandom have been a waste of time? Of course not.
You can really tell the author is 21 years old
lol thanks I am not crazy. The question in this article is kinda stupid. Was it worth it OVER WHAT? lol
I mean, what was the price to pay to play these seasons? Did we put our souls on the table? Does he mean "was it worth it" to have a NHL franchise to only have average results? Yeah, maybe not that much, move the team to the US
And regarding the "if you didn't win a championship then it was a wasted decade", lol then it's not worth it for any Canadian teams, 26 years and counting. Really, all those Canadian teams should give up and move their franchise to the US.
Really, was it complicated to ask "what is your level of satisfaction regarding the Sens decade?"