San Jose Sharks get jobbed again.

Del Preston

Registered User
Mar 8, 2013
63,171
78,954
It can't be reviewed because the puck didn't enter the net from the high stick. Wagner shot it in when it landed on the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ladyfan

Alwalys

Phu m.
May 19, 2010
25,894
6,140
This is just literal conspiracy. The ref even waved the goal off so they CHANGED the call to get it wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: saffronleaf

Tw1ster

Registered User
Mar 12, 2008
6,856
4,855
West Coast
You're wrong.

It wasn't a high-stick goal. He made contact (probably) high but that was to knock the puck down, the whistle didn't blow and he shot it in (legally). There was nothing to review.

It was just a blown call by the ref. Can’t high stick to yourself but you can’t review those in general. If it went straight in they could have reviewed it
 

LT

Global Moderator
Jul 23, 2010
41,543
12,925
It can't be reviewed because it didn't enter the net from a high stick. Wagner shot it in when it landed on the ice.

This. Goals put in with a high stick are absolutely reviewable.
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,023
17,507
Yes, but if the ref didn't blow the whistle there's nothing that can be reviewed. It's a blown call, but not reviewable.

Can they not do the "intent to blow" bs? Like I get it woulda been tough to blow the whistle in that time, but you can just say "yeah there was a high stick before that, nice play but no goal."
 
  • Like
Reactions: saffronleaf

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->