WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,699
None of those 3 are proven legit Centers in the NHL 2/3 never even played an NHL game. Reinhart would instantly improve our offence. Make sense now?So, with Larkin/Rasmussen/Veleno all under 22, we're gonna trade assets for Reinhart, even though were an obvious bottom 5 team heading into a draft loaded with elite centers.
Makes sense.
None of those 3 are proven legit Centers in the NHL 2/3 never even played an NHL game. Reinhart would instantly improve our offence. Make sense now?
None of those 3 are proven legit Centers in the NHL 2/3 never even played an NHL game. Reinhart would instantly improve our offence. Make sense now?
Read what I said. Larkin isn’t proven at Center. And when was Larkin offered in any trade ideas? Making more stuff up? Funny how you ignored Rasmussen and Veleno argument too...Larkin isn't proven so you want to trade assets for Reinhart, who Larkin has performed better than thus far.
His argument was we don’t need Reinhart because we have Larkin, Rasmussen and Veleno. Larkin isn’t a proven Center and the other two haven’t played a game in the nhl. Didn’t say Reinhart is better but it’s debatable he could potentially be a No.1 or 2 Center here. Got it now?Are you saying that Larkin is not a legit center while Reinhart is a legit center? I want to make sure I understand your stance before I comment.
Read what I said. Larkin isn’t proven at Center. And when was Larkin offered in any trade ideas? Making more stuff up? Funny how you ignored Rasmussen and Veleno argument too...
His argument was we don’t need Reinhart because we have Larkin, Rasmussen and Veleno. Larkin isn’t a proven Center and the other two haven’t played a game in the nhl. Didn’t say Reinhart is better but it’s debatable he could potentially be a No.1 or 2 Center here. Got it now?
The Wings need a lottery defenceman over another Center only Hughes would get drafted in the lottery going for BPA. Third time saying the Wings don’t have any Number one C’s they only have hypothetical “depth”. Reinhart if not the best C would definitely be number two in Detroit. And would be one of our best goal scorers. As for “assets” most of you aren’t that fond of AA/ Svechnikov or Nyquist but now they are untouchable?How about you read. I said "Trade assets" not "Trade Larkin". Larkin was brought up because you made the implication that he's not proven while advocating a trade for Reinhart, who Larkin has clearly outperformed since they came into the league.
Rasmussen and Veleno were brought up as depth. I guess I figured you'd catch onto the idea that with those two in the fold, backing Larkin and a pretty solid chance at a lottery level center in 2019, we have absolutely no need for Reinhart, but alas, I overestimated you.
The Wings need a lottery defenceman over another Center only Hughes would get drafted in the lottery going for BPA. Third time saying the Wings don’t have any Number one C’s they only have hypothetical “depth”. Reinhart if not the best C would definitely be number two in Detroit. And would be one of our best goal scorers. As for “assets” most of you aren’t that fond of AA/ Svechnikov or Nyquist but now they are untouchable?
The Wings need a lottery defenceman over another Center only Hughes would get drafted in the lottery going for BPA. Third time saying the Wings don’t have any Number one C’s they only have hypothetical “depth”. Reinhart if not the best C would definitely be number two in Detroit. And would be one of our best goal scorers. As for “assets” most of you aren’t that fond of AA/ Svechnikov or Nyquist but now they are untouchable?
None of those 3 are proven legit Centers in the NHL 2/3 never even played an NHL game. Reinhart would instantly improve our offence. Make sense now?
Stop this Hughes crap. We will get a quality player, but it's still only 18.5% chance at maximum to get the 1st overall.
Exactly we have an OVER 80% chance we ARENT getting Hughes. Yet everyone is so closed minded to even considering acquiring a 22 yr old right handed C that scored more goals than anyone on our entire team.....Stop this Hughes crap. We will get a quality player, but it's still only 18.5% chance at maximum to get the 1st overall.
Buffalo gave up less for Skinner look how Peter C gets fleeced every 6 months you never know unless you try. In negotiations you don’t START with your best offer.Skipping over the offer sheet idea (because that wont work)..
I do imagine the cost to acquire S. Reinhart by trade will be a little high. I would prefer to stick with the assets we have and keep rebuilding.
Now if we could flip Buf young-ish veterans for reinhart... thats a diff story.
AA + Nyquist + 3rd name/draft pick... That I would do (but who wouldnt) and Buff would/should not accept a deal like that...
So id say this idea is very unlikely to happen either in the fantasy world or real world.
Yes, closed minded for a few very good reasons:Exactly we have an OVER 80% chance we ARENT getting Hughes. Yet everyone is so closed minded to even considering acquiring a 22 yr old right handed C that scored more goals than anyone on our entire team.....
Exactly we have an OVER 80% chance we ARENT getting Hughes. Yet everyone is so closed minded to even considering acquiring a 22 yr old right handed C that scored more goals than anyone on our entire team.....
Did Reinhart play C for Buffalo last season? I thought he was a RW and his face-off numbers don't look great, but he is listed as a C everywhere online.
I don't think he played much center the past couple of years, especially going by his faceoff numbers. He took 210 faceoffs two years ago, and only 140 last season. If he was playing any real time in the middle, those numbers would be significantly higher.