Salary Cap: Salary Cap & Roster Building - Locked in until July

Status
Not open for further replies.

KIRK

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
109,700
51,216
Any word on Jimmy Schuldt who is the other key FA defenseman? Captain of St. Cloud State and a Hobey Baker candidate.

No link to the Penguins.

If you search his name on twitter, most chatter is about Montreal.
 

Speaking Moistly

What a terrible image.
Feb 19, 2013
39,728
7,402
Injured Reserve
One thing I wonder . . . what kind of reputation do the Pens have when it comes to young defensemen? It's one thing to say that he could compete for a spot. BUT, if you're a young offensive defenseman who needs to work on his defensive game, how appealing is Pittsburgh as a destination when you look at how some young defensemen of similar background have fared?

Recent history says they’ll be pretty damn good if they don’t have to figure out who to draft and the injury curse looks elsewhere.

Developed Dumoulin from college.
Stuck with Maatta through some shit.
Got Cole’s career solidly on track.
Rehabbed Schultz.
Oleksiak has been doing well.

They’ve been alright with the AHL guys like Bengtsson (poor bastard looked really good before getting hurt again), Pedan (matched his best AHL season), Corrado (looked respectable in the NHL) Prow (supposedly improving) and someone like Ruhwedel has carved out a sweet #7 spot. Just don’t count on them to draft defensemen.

Someone like Brickley is younger most of those guys but someone like Pouliot sucking shouldn’t ruin their reputation. They also have a good record with playing younger forwards and goalies. They’re not perfect but there shouldn’t be a flaming stay away sign, and they’re experienced with surprising health problems.
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
91,920
74,172
San Diego, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Brickley is from Salt Lake City, so an interest in west coast teams isn't necessarily surprising. Detroit is close to where he plays college hockey, and their defense is such a mess that one could assume he'll get every opportunity to start.

I would doubt that the Pens are in his top 5, but who knows. I would think that Boston is because of his uncle, but again who knows.

One thing I wonder . . . what kind of reputation do the Pens have when it comes to young defensemen? It's one thing to say that he could compete for a spot. BUT, if you're a young offensive defenseman who needs to work on his defensive game, how appealing is Pittsburgh as a destination when you look at how some young defensemen of similar background have fared?

Gotta hard disagree on this. Shero’s drafting legacy here is giving college players a chance.

Factor in you get to play with a forward core of Malkin, Crosby and Kessel, I think any college D is stoked to join this roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saints11 and KIRK

madinsomniac

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
12,854
3,022
Pittsburgh, Pa
College ufas might not be able to play in the playoffs here, but the likelyhood of us needing to call someone up from the ahl sooner or later means there should be premium ahl minutes in the ahl playoffs for them
 

AverageJoeFan

Mad cat
Feb 15, 2018
1,913
585
Pittsburgh
Andrey Pedan looks like the real deal on paper, but no NHL experience at 24. 6'5", much improved stats over last year at WBS. Not sure what his positioning, movement, passing is like, but he takes shots. Seems like he has gotten comfortable enough to pickup his O game this year. Gotta wonder what the plan is for him now that he is back from injury. Would be a decent depth guy perhaps?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJPensFan5

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,097
79,091
Redmond, WA
I am curious to see what the Penguins think of Pedan. Is he an actual prospect that the team thinks can challenge for a NHL spot? Or is he just a warm body that came back for Pouliot? His AHL stats are good, but I also think it's telling that he hasn't been called up yet. But on the other hand, he was also waiver eligible if he would have been called up this year, so maybe that's why they kept him down.

My hunch is that they view him to be the same as Corrado, an okay prospect they got for a guy they wanted to dump. If he ends up being an NHLer, great. If he doesn't, oh well. I like Corrado as the #8, but I doubt he ever gets higher than that on the depth chart.
 

Riptide

Registered User
Dec 29, 2011
38,887
6,520
Yukon
Is Brickley really expected to be that good? Or is he just another hyped "college free agent" who ends up being an Ethan Prow or any number of guys who never materialized?

Everyone said that Butcher was a meh 3rd pairing offensive D. And while I've barely watched him... he does have 37 points. So I kinda take what's said around here with a gain of salt. That said... the odds of any of these college kids being high end players is slim. But free is free, and we should be after everyone we can get our hands on - especially blueliners.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,097
79,091
Redmond, WA
Everyone said that Butcher was a meh 3rd pairing offensive D. And while I've barely watched him... he does have 37 points. So I kinda take what's said around here with a gain of salt. That said... the odds of any of these college kids being high end players is slim. But free is free, and we should be after everyone we can get our hands on - especially blueliners.

Butcher is a bottom pair PP specialist, I don't think his production really disproves any claims made about him. He's being put in a position to succeed by New Jersey, with light minutes and heavy OZone starts.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,393
25,264
Butcher is a bottom pair PP specialist, I don't think his production really disproves any claims made about him. He's being put in a position to succeed by New Jersey, with light minutes and heavy OZone starts.

Yeah, but he's a good 3rd pairing offensive D so far, not a meh one :P


Re Pedan: Based on reading Canucks fan sites, it sounds like they made a real dog's mess of his development by trying to get him to play winger.

No clue on Pens' feelings towards him, but I do hope he can develop, as a guy who won the fastest skater and hardest shot competitions at the Canucks' NHL camp a few years back would be great to have if everything else was there...
 

AverageJoeFan

Mad cat
Feb 15, 2018
1,913
585
Pittsburgh
Yeah, but he's a good 3rd pairing offensive D so far, not a meh one :P


Re Pedan: Based on reading Canucks fan sites, it sounds like they made a real dog's mess of his development by trying to get him to play winger.

No clue on Pens' feelings towards him, but I do hope he can develop, as a guy who won the fastest skater and hardest shot competitions at the Canucks' NHL camp a few years back would be great to have if everything else was there...
Did you say fastest skater? At 6'5"? If that's true...wow.
 

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
50,608
32,731
Everyone said that Butcher was a meh 3rd pairing offensive D. And while I've barely watched him... he does have 37 points. So I kinda take what's said around here with a gain of salt. That said... the odds of any of these college kids being high end players is slim. But free is free, and we should be after everyone we can get our hands on - especially blueliners.

Has any college free agent D man actually signed here though? I can’t remember one hyped prospect that ever chose the Pens...our D consists of two draft picks and basically players we traded for...

Edit..and one FA signing in Ruh
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,393
25,264
Has any college free agent D man actually signed here though? I can’t remember one hyped prospect that ever chose the Pens...our D consists of two draft picks and basically players we traded for...

Edit..and one FA signing in Ruh

Prow. Dunno how hyped he was, but he was a Hobey Baker finalist. Zink signed here on an AHL deal. Not College, but we got Bengtsson.
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,553
21,097
Has any college free agent D man actually signed here though? I can’t remember one hyped prospect that ever chose the Pens...our D consists of two draft picks and basically players we traded for...

Edit..and one FA signing in Ruh

You'd be hard-pressed to find a team that could boast signing highly touted college FAs at every position. We have been successful in terms of getting highly touted college FA forwards here.
 

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
50,608
32,731
You'd be hard-pressed to find a team that could boast signing highly touted college FAs at every position. We have been successful in terms of getting highly touted college FA forwards here.

True, but with us giving up high draft picks for many, many Sid-Geno years, we’re going to have to do a much better job of signing these guys...ZAR was a great signing...we need more of those...just seems like we miss out on a lot of top college FAs
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,097
79,091
Redmond, WA
Let's be honest, a huge percentage of undrafted defensemen don't pan out. Maybe it's just confirmation bias with how the Penguins have developed players, but it seems like there are a lot more undrafted forwards who become regulars than undrafted defensemen. That might just be the way it is with the Penguins, though.

For every Lovejoy, it seems like there are 4 guys like Letestu, Dupuis and Sheary.
 

JimmyTwoTimes

Registered User
Apr 13, 2010
19,958
5,281
Let's be honest, a huge percentage of undrafted defensemen don't pan out. Maybe it's just confirmation bias with how the Penguins have developed players, but it seems like there are a lot more undrafted forwards who become regulars than undrafted defensemen. That might just be the way it is with the Penguins, though.

For every Lovejoy, it seems like there are 4 guys like Letestu, Dupuis and Sheary.

Same goes for the draft, so yeah.

Alot to do with only 6 available spots on a roster as opposed to 12
 

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
50,608
32,731
The defensemen likely are harder to predict and develop. But we’ve done a really good job with players that started out somewhere else first (Schultz, Olek, Ruh, Cole, Dumo)...I don’t see why we can’t sign younger D directly from college and work with them too...why aren’t they interested in signing here?
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,553
21,097
True, but with us giving up high draft picks for many, many Sid-Geno years, we’re going to have to do a much better job of signing these guys...ZAR was a great signing...we need more of those...just seems like we miss out on a lot of top college FAs

There's 31 teams in the league man. Every team misses out on a lot of college FAs, and many of them aren't as successful as we've been. We seemingly just hit a home run with ZAR and got what many considered a potential top college FA in Adam Johnson, who was so impressed with the Pens development camp that he signed with us a year early. I bet a lot of teams around the league are wishing they had that kind of recent success.

We can always do a better job, and it has to be a big part of our pipeline because of all the draft picks we move as contenders, but there's no merit in suggesting that the Pens haven't been on the ball so far. They've done a pretty bang-up job. But again, there are 30 other teams who want the same thing, so even the best FA recruiters are going to have far, far more misses than hits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peat

Shady Machine

Registered User
Aug 6, 2010
36,704
8,141
Butcher is a bottom pair PP specialist, I don't think his production really disproves any claims made about him. He's being put in a position to succeed by New Jersey, with light minutes and heavy OZone starts.

He has 20 ES points this year as a 23 year old rookie. Still pretty impressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riptide

Riptide

Registered User
Dec 29, 2011
38,887
6,520
Yukon
Honestly, I think they could probably get him cheaper if they REALLY tried. Like they did with Schultz.

I'd MUCH rather just spend the 2m vs taking the chance that he leaves if we didn't qualify him all in the attempt to save 500k (or whatever). We might not really need Sheahan next season (at least not as a 3C), but I'd rather have both him and Brassard on the team come next June (2019) even if both were pending FAs. I have next to no confidence that we would be able to extend Brassard. I'm fairly confident that we could extend Sheahan if we were going to give him the 3C role. Not ideal... but if he can play at a 35/40pt pace with Kessel on his wing... then I'd extend him vs taking a chance that we couldn't find a replacement. Much better off overpaying to keep him, vs ending up in the same boat we were in this Oct come Oct 2019.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->