Salary Cap: Salary Cap & Roster Building | I like to do just like the rest, I like my sugar sweet

Status
Not open for further replies.

DegenX

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Aug 14, 2011
14,622
5,683
All figures are cap numbers, not salaries.
2017-18 salary ceiling$75,000,000
Projected dollars committed
74,298,633​
2016-17 bonus overage
50,000​
Approximate cap space
668,239
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

PITTSBURGH PENGUINS

Forward..................................
Pos.
Age
..........2017-18
..........2018-19
..........2019-20
Evgeni Malkin
C​
31​
9,500,000​
9,500,000​
9,500,000​
Sidney Crosby
C​
30​
8,700,000​
8,700,000​
8,700,000​
Phil Kessel
RW​
29​
6,800,000​
6,800,000​
6,800,000​
Patric Hornqvist
RW​
30​
4,250,000​
UFA
Carl Hagelin
LW​
29​
4,000,000​
4,000,000​
UFA
Conor Sheary
LW​
25​
3,000,000​
3,000,000​
3,000,000​
Riley Sheahan
C​
25​
2,075,000​
RFA
Ryan Reaves
RW​
30​
1,125,000​
UFA
Jake Guentzel
LW​
22​
734,167​
734,167​
RFA
Josh Archibald
RW​
24​
675,000​
675,000​
RFA
Greg McKegg
C​
25​
650,000​
RFA
Bryan Rust
RW​
25​
640,000​
RFA
Scott Wilson
LW​
25​
635,000​
RFA
Tom Kuhnhackl
LW​
25​
625,000​
RFA
Carter Rowney
C​
28​
612,500​
UFA
Defense
Pos.
Age
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
Kris Letang
D​
30​
7,250,000​
7,250,000​
7,250,000​
Justin Schultz
D​
27​
5,500,000​
5,500,000​
5,500,000​
Brian Dumoulin
D​
26​
4,100,000​
4,100,000​
4,100,000​
Olli Maatta
D​
23​
4,083,333​
4,083,333​
4,083,333​
Matt Hunwick
D​
32​
2,250,000​
2,250,000​
2,250,000​
Ian Cole
D​
28​
2,100,000​
UFA
Chad Ruhwedel
D​
27​
650,000​
650,000​
UFA
Goalie
Pos.
Age
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
Matt Murray
G​
23​
3,750,000​
3,750,000​
3,750,000​
Tristan Jarry
G​
22​
630,833​
RFA
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
WILKES-BARRE/SCRANTON PENGUINS
Forward..................................
Pos.
Age
..........2017-18
..........2018-19
..........2019-20
Zach Aston-Reese
LW​
23​
925,000​
925,000​
RFA
Adam Johnson
C​
23​
925,000​
925,000​
RFA
Thomas Di Pauli
C​
23​
742,500​
RFA
Freddie Tiffels
LW​
22​
742,500​
742,500​
RFA
Sam Miletic
LW​
20​
710,000​
710,000​
710,000​
Teddy Blueger
C​
23​
705,000​
RFA
Daniel Sprong
RW​
20​
692,500​
RFA
Dominik Simon
C​
23​
692,500​
RFA
Jean-Sebastien Dea
C​
23​
650,000​
RFA
Garrett Wilson
LW​
24​
650,000​
650,000​
UFA
Greg McKegg
C​
25​
650,000​
RFA
Tom Sestito
LW​
29​
650,000​
UFA
Defense
Pos.
Age
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
Andrey Pedan
D​
24​
750,000​
RFA
Jeff Taylor
D​
23​
742,500​
742,500​
RFA
Ethan Prow
D​
24​
730,000​
RFA
Lukas Bengtsson
D​
24​
705,000​
RFA
Frank Corrado
D​
24​
650,000​
RFA
Jarred Tinordi
D​
25​
650,000​
RFA
Zach Trotman
D​
27​
650,000​
UFA
Kevin Czuczman
D​
26​
650,000​
UFA
Chris Summers
D​
29​
650,000​
650,000​
UFA
Goalie
Pos.
Age
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
Sean Maguire
G​
25​
705,000​
RFA
Casey DeSmith
G​
25​
675,000​
675,000​
UFA
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
SIGNED PROSPECTS
Player
Pos.
Age
Current team
Contract
Filip Gustavsson
G​
19​
Lulea HF (SHL)​
3 years/775,833 per​
Alex D'Orio
G​
18​
Saint John (QMJHL)​
3 years/716,667 per​
Jordy Bellerive
C​
18​
Lethbridge (WHL)​
3 years/716,667 per​
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

UNSIGNED PROSPECTS

Player
Pos.
Age
Current team
Niclas Almari
D​
19​
HPK (Liiga)
Anthony Angello
F​
21​
Cornell (ECAC)
Dane Birks
D​
21​
Michigan Tech (WCHA)
Kasper Bjorkqvist
F​
19​
Providence (HEA)
Jan Drozg
F​
18​
Shawinigan (QMJHL)
Connor Hall
D​
19​
Kitchener (OHL)
Ryan Jones
D​
21​
Nebraska-Omaha (NCHC)
Sam Lafferty
F​
22​
Brown (ECAC)
Zachary Lauzon
D​
18​
Rouyn-Noranda (QMJHL)
Joe Masonius
D​
20​
Connecticut (HEA)
Linus Olund
F​
20​
Brynas IF (SHL)
Antti Palojarvi
D​
18​
Lukko U20 (SML Jr.A)
Nikita Pavlychev
F​
20​
Penn State (Big Ten)
Clayton Phillips
D​
17​
Fargo (USHL)
Will Reilly
D​
19​
RPI (ECAC)
Dominik Uher
C​
24​
HC Sparta Praha (ELH)
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

larueskee

Player/Member USA Hockey or affilates 1972-2006
Mar 15, 2017
1,355
1,764
Seattle, WA
Here is a good article on Cole by Tim Benz in the triblive.

There are good trades and bad trades. And the bad trades usually get labeled that way because they get made for the wrong reasons.
Those reasons are usually financial. For instance, when the Penguins traded away Jaromir Jagr.
Or when the Pirates trade away, well, just about anyone.
If defenseman Ian Cole gets dealt from the Penguins, as has been discussed quite publicly of late, it won't be strictly because of money.
But it might also be for the wrong reasons.
Speculation amongst media members who cover the team is that there is some sort of personality rift between Cole and coach Mike Sullivan. A lot of that belief stems from a sense that Cole is too chummy with the media for Sullivan's taste.
Yes, Cole is open with reporters. But I don't see that as a bad thing unless he is giving away tactical secrets, bashing teammates, or providing bulletin board material for opponents.
None of which I remember Cole doing to any severe degree.
For his part, Sullivan has bristled at the suggestion Cole has been scratched for the intent of keeping him healthy until a deal has been made, or for any type of personality clash.
“I think sometimes you guys make it up as you go,” Sullivan told reporters. “I don't know where this stuff comes from.”
Well a lot of people from competing outlets have made up the same story I guess.
But let's take the coach at his word. Let's assume there's no conflict with Cole. Why then is he being scratched?
“We've had a couple of games where the coach made a change on defense,” general manager Jim Rutherford said. “We'll have to see where that goes as we go forward.”
That's not exactly dousing the trade rumors, GMJR.
In one sense you could understand why Rutherford would want some smoke out there around Cole, even if there isn't a burning fire to trade him. He's in the final year of his contract and likely will be too expensive for Pittsburgh to resign against the salary cap next year.
Then there's the looming need to either keep or replace Patric Hornqvist, as well.
A shot-blocking defenseman who has been an important penalty-killing contributor on two Stanley Cup winners in the walk year of his deal may be a valuable trade commodity.
Then again, all those attributes are reasons why the Pens should keep Cole. Also, keep in mind Cole is currently less expensive than five other regular defensemen on the NHL roster.
Furthermore, Cole has a far better resume and measurables than Chad Ruhwedel or any of the other defensemen in Wilkes-Barre who would be replacements.
Cole's game hasn't been where it needs to be, particularly on Pittsburgh's leaky PK unit this year (26th in the NHL). The Notre Dame product is far from the only Penguin to be guilty of that, yet he seems to be the most scapegoated so far.
If Cole were to be traded, the assumption is that some quality forward scoring depth would come back to Pittsburgh in return. The Penguins have struggled in that area this year.
Although, Rutherford would have to keep in mind how much actual quality would be associated with such a player if he were to carry a price tag in the neighborhood of Cole's $2.1 million salary cap hit. The Penguins couldn't take on much more than that in return for Cole and remain cap compliant since they are within about a million dollars of the ceiling as it is.
As a comparison, Anaheim just dealt right-handed shooting defenseman Sami Vatanen to New Jersey. Vatanen is more expensive than Cole by $2.77 million. But he is slightly younger (26) than Cole (28), under contract through 2020, and has more offensive prowess.
What did he yield in return from the Devils? Forwards Adam Henrique, Joseph Blandisi and a third-round pick.
That's $5.66 million against the cap this year for two players who have totaled seven goals in 51 combined games. Henrique scored 30 times two years ago. But he was recently demoted to the fourth line in New Jersey.
Does that kind of offensive production at that price sound worth it to you for a defenseman who has been a staple in your top six for two straight playoff runs?
If Rutherford can do better than that in exchange for Cole, then I'm all for it. Then, in theory, that would make “hockey sense.”
But to deal him in an effort to throw good cap space after less than good promise of scoring in return, all in the pursuit of apparently eliminating some manageable personality rub?
 

66-30-33

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
63,146
16,167
Victoria, BC
Imagine our D with Karlsson...pipe dream I know.

??-Karlsson (12M)
??-??
??-??

I dunno how the cap would work, would have to lose Letang with no retention and probably Kessel aswell.
 

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,520
Imagine our D with Karlsson...pipe dream I know.

??-Karlsson (12M)
??-??
??-??

I dunno how the cap would work, would have to lose Letang with no retention and probably Kessel aswell.

Phil makes me smile though....... and I guess he scores a lot too ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 66-30-33

EightyOne

My posts are jokes. And hockey is just a game.
Nov 23, 2016
12,697
12,034
You just fill the quotation marks with whoever is in Wheeling.

Duh.
 

mpp9

Registered User
Dec 5, 2010
32,616
5,074
Imagine our D with Karlsson...pipe dream I know.

??-Karlsson (12M)
??-??
??-??

I dunno how the cap would work, would have to lose Letang with no retention and probably Kessel aswell.

Love to see him with Sid and Geno, but he’s not 5 mil better than Letang. And our young guys will be getting paid soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZeroPucksGiven

JTG

Registered User
Sep 30, 2007
50,420
5,692
If JR trades Cole, it's pretty clear what he would be trading him for.
 

Shady Machine

Registered User
Aug 6, 2010
36,704
8,141
He would fit perfectly on HF. He's a guy who loves when a fire starts so he can pour gasoline on it. Sometimes he tries to pour gasoline on a hot day just to idiotically start a fire. That's his whole gimmick.

Exactly right. I wouldn't be surprised if he did post here.
 

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,520
If JR trades Cole, it's pretty clear what he would be trading him for.

It’d have to be a 3C.

Maybe a really good bottom 6 LW and even then is it worth the trade off, probably not.
 

Honour Over Glory

Fire Sully
Jan 30, 2012
77,316
42,447
All I want is for JR to drop his bullshit about not signing players during the season (Which he has, numerous times) and sign Hornqvist. That's all I f***ing want. For now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZeroPucksGiven

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,115
79,120
Redmond, WA
All I want is for JR to drop his bull**** about not signing players during the season (Which he has, numerous times) and sign Hornqvist. That's all I ****ing want. For now.

It's not even really true either, he signed a ton of guys in season over the last few years. I think all of Murray, Fleury, Maatta, Rust, Wilson and Kuhnhackl have gotten in season extensions under Rutherford.
 

Honour Over Glory

Fire Sully
Jan 30, 2012
77,316
42,447
It’d have to be a 3C.

Maybe a really good bottom 6 LW and even then is it worth the trade off, probably not.

Bottom LW? We need an upgrade on Hagelin more than we need an upgrade on Sheahan in my books. Sheahan has proven, in his time here so far, that he can help wingers that are capable of producing, produce. Hagelin is not capable of producing. He's had turns with Crosby and Malkin and he's just offensively impotent.

Moving Cole for a 3C and moving Sheahan down solves nothing. There's no magical player out there that will make Hagelin produce like a top 9 player ever again. But on the 4LW, Hagelin can at least wreak havoc with forechecking.
 

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,520
JR would wait on Hornqvist until after the deadline no matter what I’d imagine.
 

Honour Over Glory

Fire Sully
Jan 30, 2012
77,316
42,447
It's not even really true either, he signed a ton of guys in season over the last few years. I think all of Murray, Fleury, Maatta, Rust, Wilson and Kuhnhackl have gotten in season extensions under Rutherford.

Exactly, so his posturing of "Oh it'd be uncharacteristic of me" is horse shit. So it really irks me that he has done all of that, which we all know, and then Horny is still sitting there with no contract.
 

Honour Over Glory

Fire Sully
Jan 30, 2012
77,316
42,447
Was it Hagelin-Rowney-Rust last game? Cause they looked great.

I am 100% ok with that as the 4th line, I think Rust would still produce fairly well there and then it leaves the 3rd line that needs to be sorted out which I think JR can do with a move with Cole to pick up a winger and then promote or give one of DiPauli, ZAR, and when Sprong gets the green light from the coaching staff in WBS, him.


Sheary, Crosby, Hornqvist
Guentzel, Malkin, Kessel
XXXX, Sheahan, XXXX - Which can be DiPaul/ZAR, Sheahan, Winger they get, or Winger they get, Sheahan, DiPauli/ZAR - I believe ZAR/DiPauli play LW/RW.
Hagelin, Rowney, Rust
 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Registered User
Sep 5, 2008
28,726
2,346
I don't think we need to move/upgrade Hagelin. I get that he's not scoring, but he's still extremely fast, fits the system, is one of our only defensively responsible forwards, and plays LW. As much as his production sucks, he's not a guy we can/should move imo. I'd move Sheary before Hagelin for a few reasons; mainly their respective values to other teams (Sheary is infinitely higher, I'd venture to guess), and because I think we can afford to move/replace Sheary more easily than Hagelin--as crazy as that may sound when looking at their stats.

We'll see a big uptick in production when guys like Sid and Letang wake up, and Geno returns. Until then, it doesn't really matter if Hagelin's an offensive blackhole imo. He shouldn't be the guy we're relying on for production anyway. Not to completely acquit him for his lack of scoring, but in reality he's nowhere near the top of the list of guys we absolutely need numbers from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZeroPucksGiven

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,520
Bottom LW? We need an upgrade on Hagelin more than we need an upgrade on Sheahan in my books. Sheahan has proven, in his time here so far, that he can help wingers that are capable of producing, produce. Hagelin is not capable of producing. He's had turns with Crosby and Malkin and he's just offensively impotent.

Moving Cole for a 3C and moving Sheahan down solves nothing. There's no magical player out there that will make Hagelin produce like a top 9 player ever again. But on the 4LW, Hagelin can at least wreak havoc with forechecking.

Personally I’d rather a better 3C and Hagelin than Sheahan and a better LW. Then try for a cheap LW for the 4th line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZeroPucksGiven

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,115
79,120
Redmond, WA
I don't think we need to move/upgrade Hagelin. I get that he's not scoring, but he's still extremely fast, fits the system, is one of our only defensively responsible forwards, and plays LW. As much as his production sucks, he's not a guy we can/should move imo. I'd move Sheary before Hagelin for a few reasons; mainly their respective values to other teams (Sheary is infinitely higher, I'd venture to guess), and because I think we can afford to move/replace Sheary more easily than Hagelin--as crazy as that may sound when looking at their stats.

Yes, that does sound pretty crazy :laugh:

I wouldn't trade Sheary before Hagelin for a million reasons. It's not even a thought that crosses my mind, that would be a total non-starter.
 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Registered User
Sep 5, 2008
28,726
2,346
Yes, that does sound pretty crazy :laugh:

I wouldn't trade Sheary before Hagelin for a million reasons. It's not even a thought that crosses my mind, that would be a total non-starter.
:laugh: I just don't think Hagelin's got any real value, certainly not more to other teams than he does here (speed, LW, defensive game, PKer). If we're moving pieces to fix the roster, I think we can afford to lose Sheary's production (which is all he brings) more easily than we can Hagelin's attributes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad