If you view Brassard as a 4th liner as his usage tends to be here are we disappointed with his production?
Why are his minutes dropping? It’s not because he’s playing well that’s for sure.
If you view Brassard as a 4th liner as his usage tends to be here are we disappointed with his production?
Brassard's ATOI at 5v5 of 13:13 is 69th best among centres (and Natural Stat Trick are pretty ropey about who's a centre) in the NHL this season. That's not a 4th liner. Its dropped to 12:10 over the 7 game streak, but that's still probably sorta 3rd line once you deduct the fake centres - Bonino had an ATOI of 12:01 through the 16-17 season.
They are dropping Kessel and Pearson’s minutes as well.
Not to his extent but that line is getting outchanced heavily in he 59 minutes they have been together.
Scoring chances for: 14 (high danger 7)
Scoring chances agt: 38 ((high danger 14)
Hm. Those numbers seem off to me.
Not really surprised. The insistence on running out third best player on the third line is just bizarre especially when he’s killed it with Sid so far this year.
I guess when you look around the league stacking your top line is just something you don’t see though..
they play with only one puck. much easer to fill in with lesser supporting players.I guess when you look around the league stacking your top line is just something you don’t see though..
Tender Rip said:People talk about the drop-off from Brassard to Sheahan at 3C.. it might be there, granted, we just haven’t seen it.
Tender Rip said:Now, do it anyway and get Malkin’s LW with Brassard as the principal return. You get a hopefully clearly improved second line, and you get Simon to utilize elsewhere.
C-depth remains, with Cully, Grant and Blueger. It would be different if there was just a hint of the HBK magic - but there hasn’t been. With that in mind I’d be much more about making sure Geno is happy.
If anything - we are not overplaying Sid or Geno anymore, and we can give both those guys the odd third line shift with Kessel when its crunch/playoff time.
If you view Brassard as a 4th liner as his usage tends to be here are we disappointed with his production?
Brassard isn't costing games.
That's my positive take.
molon labe said:Sully's pet project (which is fine with me so long as ZAR doesn't go full blown Kunitz)
EightyOne said:But I know @ColePens didn't pay $3.54 s gallon for fuel this morning like me.
pixiesfanyo said:Slightly less minutes?
During the win streak Brassard has been playing between 11-13 minutes most games. He’s being used as a 4th liner.
Not really surprised. The insistence on running out third best player on the third line is just bizarre especially when he’s killed it with Sid so far this year.
I guess when you look around the league stacking your top line is just something you don’t see though..
Not really surprised. The insistence on running out third best player on the third line is just bizarre especially when he’s killed it with Sid so far this year.
I guess when you look around the league stacking your top line is just something you don’t see though..
The thing is, we do have options we haven't tried. To my dying day I'll never understand why Sullivan insists on playing Rust on RW with this roster.
Who's our most skilled and most defensively suspect wing?
Kessel.
Who's our best defensive winger who could play a complementary role on a scoring line?
Rust.
God forbid they play together. Whether it's with Brassard or Malkin, there's no good reason not to try it... especially with the middle six in the state it's in.
We can't just be a one line team. Putting Guentzel and Kessel with Crosby is overkill. Our objective is to win hockey games, and while it's possible that we can win with that line scoring 2-3 goals a game, we're probably better off having another line help out with the offense. And given how Kessel and Malkin have played so far this season (at least recently), putting him there probably doesn't do all that much for us.
I don’t see how having Simon, Rust, Hornqvist, and Pearson on L2 and L3 three of who are on a 35+ pace makes us a one line team.
Not to mention Malkin and Brassard.
The effectiveness of a Malkin line without much for skill on it is going to really hamper his production. We have years of experience/data telling us this. The exception would be in 2015/16 when the HBK line was on fire (and out producing Malkin's line by a good 30%), and their ability to force coaches to choose between covering Malkin or HBK. New York and Washington choose to cover Malkin. Tampa and San Jose chose to cover HBK. It never mattered because the other line produced.
But one doesn't have to go all that far back to see teams where the wingers were not a threat at all to make a play, and teams just covered the hell out of Malkin. Now I'm a big fan of Hornqvist... but he's not going to make plays and pick up much slack if Malkin is getting double teamed. And other than perhaps Simon (who's still hit and miss), the same goes for the rest of those guys. Hard workers with some skill, but not enough to regularly be someone who's going to make a play in the tight coverage we see in the POs.
The only exception to this is perhaps if we have a 3rd line that is a major threat to score. Then at least one of Crosby/Malkin/Kessel will be getting easier matchup's and a little more time and space that can hopefully be exploited and hopefully translate into more sustainable offense overall.
I get that HBK was a unicorn that we'll likely never see again. I'm okay with that. But that doesn't mean I want to see something akin to what we had last playoffs where only Crosby's line was scoring - because that's not a good recipe for success.