HawkeyTalkMan
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2015
- 6,271
- 3,445
Let's call a spade a spade. That was an awful try.Nice try the Sabres can't and don't want more cap troubles
Let's call a spade a spade. That was an awful try.Nice try the Sabres can't and don't want more cap troubles
People ALWAYS do this and it is getting infuriating. You're counting pennies like it's all equal when it isn't. You have 2 roster spots added and compare them to 1 and say there's a savings of 25k/day. You're completely ignoring the fact that a 2 for 1 roster spot LEAVES OUT ANOTHER PLAYER and their subsequent salary. If you're going to make an argument, at least put in all the work, not just part.
Byron and a 4th for Scandella
Unless you upgraded the 4th to a 1st and retained 50% on Byron---no.... not taking 3 more yrs of a smurf.
Byron and a 4th for Scandella
We're talking about Scandella and not Dahlin or Ristolainen here..Unless you upgraded the 4th to a 1st and retained 50% on Byron---no.... not taking 3 more yrs of a smurf.
Byron and a 4th for Scandella
Even up the money for this season and done.Granlund (with retention) for Scandella? Maybe Granlund can rebound and add some more scoring to the Sabres' top 9 while the Preds fix their bottom pair.
Why not fit?though I would argue that he isn't the best fit for BUF.
15. May mean something, may mean nothing, but both Montreal and New Jersey sent a different mix of scouts to separate games in Buffalo. (First was against Arizona, second versus the Islanders.) When I first started, a GM told me to look for that kind of thing.
Done.Granlund (with retention) for Scandella? Maybe Granlund can rebound and add some more scoring to the Sabres' top 9 while the Preds fix their bottom pair.
Well good news. He won't be getting a raiseA shame he only has one year left. We could use him if he could be extended at a fair price.
I completely disagree with this, Our current top six has sobotka in it.... plus we have 2 shooters in skinner and oloffson if that's the case.They already have some good setup men in Eichel(yes, i know he scores, too) and Mittelstadt. Maybe even Reinhart? Granlunds thing when he is playing well is dominating the puck and setting up shooters.
Oh, and between Reinhart and him there would be too much IQ in the room.
Oh no man, disagree with you. We have two shooters for different links in the top 6, we play Sobotka on the right wing in the second link and he is just terrible in attack. Granlund would be a very good upgrade to Sobotka, Vesey and Sheary.Granlund is worth far more than Scandella, even with his slump. If he returns back to his old self (and it's not like he's old), he is a legitimate 1st line player, though I would argue that he isn't the best fit for BUF.
Well, this is a question for the coach, I would also try it on the fwing than to release it with marginal players in the fourth link, maybe they want him to play only in the center. On the other hand, we will not have 3C either.Why not just play Mittelstadt on the wing? Sobotka should be on the 4th line.
Questions we all want answers to.Why not just play Mittelstadt on the wing? Sobotka should be on the 4th line.
perrault for scandella swap ?
Agreed on both points. Although, I'd prefer Sobotka off the roster, but, meh, personal preference. But yea, Mitts to wing makes a ton of sense, he's not exactly catching fire being heavily sheltered at center.Why not just play Mittelstadt on the wing? Sobotka should be on the 4th line.