Sabres early round drafting 2002-2007

Discussion in 'Buffalo Sabres' started by Husko, Nov 2, 2013.

View Users: View Users
  1. Husko

    Husko Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    10,023
    Likes Received:
    616
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    New York, NY
    It almost goes without saying, but at the risk of making the Kaleta thread go way off topic, I present this thread. It just strikes me how we managed to draft so poorly for such a stretch of time. I wonder of Tommy G was really pulling the purse strings tight? Anywho, it makes why we suck now so painfully obvious:

    2002
    1: Keith Ballard and Daniel Paille*
    2: None
    3: Michael Tessier*** and John Adams***

    2003
    1: Vanek
    2: Branislav Farby***
    3: Clarke McCarthur

    2004
    1: Drew Stafford
    2: Michael Funk**
    3: Andrej Sekera

    And here's where it get's really really bad.

    2005
    1: Marek Zagrapan***
    2: Phillip Gogulla***
    3: MA Gragani*

    2006
    1: Dennis Perrson***
    2: Enroth & Weber
    3: None

    2007
    1: Traded
    2: TJ Brennan** & Drew Schiestel***
    3: Tropp

    ***Zero NHL games player
    **LEss than 50 NHL games played
    *Husko calls it a bad pick


    Just think, these are the players that should be our main core, with just a few vets left from the older core still leading. I would offer, the "Rochester core" didn't fail that bad, Vanek, Roy, Pominville, Gaustad while not ideal, wouldn't be awful if players from this era, especially 05-07, were filling out the roster behind them. Blah, what an atrocious era.
     
  2. Jame

    Jame Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    50,093
    Likes Received:
    4,534
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Florida
    horse duke....
     
  3. OcAirlines

    OcAirlines Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,684
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    66
    In response to Jame (couldn't quote your original post, was it deleted or just moved?):

    I'm not just talking about busts, who are indeed quite common even in the first half of the 1st, but especially in the second half. I'm talking about two picks in a row who didn't play a single NHL-game, didn't have an impact in the AHL and now even suck in their respective European leagues. I think this is pretty uncommon, since even guys like Bacashiuha, Chistov or Olsen at least played some games at the NHL-level and/or played good in weaker leagues.
     
  4. Djp

    Djp Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    11,661
    Likes Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Seattle,WA
    Ive done this analysis extensively.

    During the 2002-2004 draft period Buffalo had one of the best success in drafting in rounds 1-3. They produced 6 NHL players.

    Remember once you get past pick 20 it's less than a 50/50 shot to even draft an NHL player that plays more than a cup of coffee.

    Round 3 is even less

    You get any NHL player in rounds 4-7 it's a big bonus.

    2005-2007 they did poorly in their success. They were one f the lowest in nly drafting Weber, Enroth, and Tropp.

    A big factor in this was the serious cuts n scouting that they have since restored.

    Now frm 2008-2010 they have been one of the best in picking players

    2011-2013 is very strong so far.

    You also have to ake nto account where you pick. Generally you pick top 6 / top 9 player. If you pick a top 5 you should get a top line/top pairing player, pick 6-14 you get a second pair/second line player and the rest of the draft it's top 6/top 9,,, you get top 6/ top 4 later then that s a success.
     
  5. Djp

    Djp Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    11,661
    Likes Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Seattle,WA
    As for 2005-2007

    They cut scouting.

    If you look at where they picks and what came out a few picks after them, it wasn't as f they passed over players.

    The nly ssue was 2006 when they drafted Perrson. They passed over nick Foligno and Perron IIRC
     
  6. yahhockey

    yahhockey Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    1,614
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Overall those picks aren't that bad and would probably be considered above average for their returns based on the draft positions.
    The first rounders were taken 11, 20, 5, 13, 13 and 24. We had one top ten selection and he is a proven first line scorer. Three of the other picks were serviceable NHLers worthy of a roster spot and two were duds.
    The second rounders had two hits, three misses and the jury is still out on Brennan.
    The third rounders had two hits, three misses and maybe another hit with Tropp.
    Do you know how many teams would give anything to draft NHL caliber players in the second and third rounds in the 40-50% range? There is only one superstar out of all of those draft picks and there was only only one top ten pick out of all of those draft picks. This is the problem the team faces today with a lot of NHL worthy players on the team or in the system but not really any superstars. We need to tank for two seasons and hope that there are a few offensive superstars in the next two drafts.
     
  7. dotcommunism

    dotcommunism Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    4,105
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Are you seriously criticizing the Sabres for not picking Perron in the first round in 2006 when he didn't get drafted until 2007 and didn't even play major junior in 2005-2006?
     
  8. Ruman Ndur

    Ruman Ndur Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2010
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    34
    I'm assuming he meant Berglund.
     
  9. jBuds

    jBuds pretty damn valuable Sponsor

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    30,250
    Likes Received:
    657
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Byuckkak
     
  10. Djp

    Djp Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    11,661
    Likes Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Seattle,WA
    I was writting that off the top of my head---the issue was an NHL player was picked a few players after Buffalo's pick by St Louis.
     
  11. Chainshot

    Chainshot Give 'em Enough Rope

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    79,644
    Likes Received:
    7,280
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Occupation:
    Herding Cats
    Location:
    Costa Rica
    Awards:
    I'm curious how you can call a quality NHL like Paille a "bad" pick? Also, if the selectivity is only back to 2002 since the 2001 draft wound up being strangely productive in the second round (Roy, Pominville, Thorburn all NHLers), 2000 and '99 were also lacking effectiveness at the top end of there selection process.
     
  12. jc17

    jc17 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Messages:
    3,211
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Also adding on to what a lot of the responses have said, its not like the Sabres passed on great players that were obvious picks.
    In 2002 Semin and Steen were the only players they passed on that had much success.

    Vanek was a great pick in 2003.

    In 2004 there weren't many good picks right after stafford was picked.

    2005 was pretty bad, but again few good players were taken directly after Zagrapan.

    2006-same story. In fact the 6 defensemen taken after Persson have played a combined a combined 69 games in the NHL.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"