I wasn't comparing them.
I was using him as an example of how fans turn against someone when they don't reach an expected level of performance.
Its not something widely understood. Any player thats played here for say 5yrs is assumed crap and as if they are useless on the basis of association with this team. Its basic classical conditioning paradigm operating. I think at least subconsciously.
We saw that yesterday with Smid. We've seen it with Gilbert, we've seen it countless times.
Any NEW player, no matter how horrible they are, like Mike Brown, is "just what this team needs" and is lorded over by posters while throwing any veteran player on this team under the bus. Seriously I could write a list of 25 of these fictions over the last number of years.
ergo, any player that has not been here is assumed better, because there is no developed association with losing here, but any player that has been here is considered chopped chicken liver, or "Gagner blows" as BBO astutely confirms.