Ryan Graves

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
62,704
46,680
Graves doesn't have the same offensive instincts as Holden but he's better defensively, which is more of a black mark on Holden than a compliment to Graves.

Anyway, he's clicking relatively well with Makar. I get that he's not a long-term solution in the top-four but for now just keep those two together if you're absolutely dead-set against reuniting Turn and Burn.

I really wish NHL coaches would get over the idea that it can't work. Girard and Makar have been killer together whenever paired.... Girard and Barrie will killer together whenever paired. Yeah they may get you in a bind from time to time, but overall they are going to give you far more chances than they give up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cgf and Pokecheque

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,267
31,334
The one thing I would say is that Graves is a perfect example of not looking too much into AHL numbers. Graves wasn’t exactly good in his Eagles time last year, but seems to do better in the more structured system of the NHL. He wouldn’t be the first player to do that either.

I think a lot of that might be that Bednar and Pratt seem like really good motivators. They seem really good at getting the most out of certain guys.
 

Northern Avs Fan

Registered User
May 27, 2019
21,970
29,648
I really wish NHL coaches would get over the idea that it can't work. Girard and Makar have been killer together whenever paired.... Girard and Barrie will killer together whenever paired. Yeah they may get you in a bind from time to time, but overall they are going to give you far more chances than they give up.

I think you’d see another offensive gear from both Giard and Makar if they were paired together
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
62,704
46,680
O’Connor called up.

Connauton aswell
LOC:
giphy.gif


Connauton:
tenor.gif
 

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,267
31,334

AvsFan29

Registered User
Mar 15, 2018
17,516
15,641
He needs to get excellent at it especially on the PK if thats the kind of role he wants to etch out in the NHL.
I agree. I have him on a long leash because I didn’t expect much from him. He’s played well above my expectations. He’s definitely a serviceable NHL player, and has been producing lately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Kingslayer

SirLoinOfCloth

Registered User
Apr 22, 2019
5,894
11,902
Colorado
Zadorov has a great shot from the point. He doesn't use it enough IMO. It's not always accurate but it's a bomb.

He had 5 goals from slap shots last year.

<snip>

How DARE you post video evidence of Z being more than a scrub! Last year he had 100 shots on goal, and 7 goals which gave him a higher shot-percentage than any other defenseman on the team (with more than 27 shots), including our savior Barrie.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
46,071
29,140
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
It's a good shot. Not spectacular, and he's obviously not phenomenal about getting it through traffic, but when he's allotted enough room to really fire it, he can do some damage. He's really at his best when he's confident with the puck and skating around. Any sort of hesitancy creeps into his game, it all kinda falls apart.
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,295
19,194
w/ Renly's Peach
I really wish NHL coaches would get over the idea that it can't work. Girard and Makar have been killer together whenever paired.... Girard and Barrie will killer together whenever paired. Yeah they may get you in a bind from time to time, but overall they are going to give you far more chances than they give up.

The best argument against it is the lack of puck-moving our other two pairings would have if both smurfs were on the top pairing...but that seems easier to solve...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foppa2118

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
62,704
46,680
The best argument against it is the lack of puck-moving our other two pairings would have if both smurfs were on the top pairing...but that seems easier to solve...

Especially when there are two in Loveland and one that could maybe join at the end of the season. :nod:
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
46,071
29,140
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
The best argument against it is the lack of puck-moving our other two pairings would have if both smurfs were on the top pairing...but that seems easier to solve...

I've argued for years that putting a puckmover with EJ holds EJ back (virtually everyone else argues otherwise). Put him with a more stay-at-home guy and he's more apt to jump into the play, which is where he does the most good.
 

McMetal

Writer of Wrongs
Sep 29, 2015
14,142
12,130
I think these last two games are a natural outcome of playing a guy like this in the top 4. With as much ice as Makar needs to get, Graves is getting dragged into matchups he isn't qualified to take on, and the result is him taking penalties to try to make up for getting caught behind the play.

I'm not sure the benching he got against Vancouver tonight was entirely warranted, but a permanent demotion to the bottom pair most certainly is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klozge

MarkT

Heretic
Nov 11, 2017
3,997
4,513
I love Graves, but he's clearly in over his head playing these minutes this early in his career. The issue is Z-Makar didn't work very well. I don't know what the pairs should be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klozge

expatriatedtexan

Habitual Line Stepper
Aug 17, 2005
16,601
12,058
I love Graves, but he's clearly in over his head playing these minutes this early in his career. The issue is Z-Makar didn't work very well. I don't know what the pairs should be.
Yep, there is a huge difference between Graves as a #6 versus #3 or 4.

At this point, I think I would force the D to get used to each other. They need to practice heavy and make this work...

Girard-Makar
Zadorov-Johnson
Graves-Cole

Graves-Cole are going to get a lot of PK minutes but not as much at 5v5. They are not playing at a #4 level so they need reduces minutes....but they have both shown the ability to play the PK. I think the problem we've always have had is that we've asked them to play too many minutes.

g/m...just go for the throat, all out offense..push the play.
z/j...squash in zone play, smother the puck, chip it out. They have got to get better at this. Both of them are capable of carrying the puck out of the d-zone. They should be forcing the play into the O-zone and if not creating much, at least force a face-off there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkT

MarkT

Heretic
Nov 11, 2017
3,997
4,513
Yep, there is a huge difference between Graves as a #6 versus #3 or 4.

At this point, I think I would force the D to get used to each other. They need to practice heavy and make this work...

Girard-Makar
Zadorov-Johnson
Graves-Cole

Graves-Cole are going to get a lot of PK minutes but not as much at 5v5. They are not playing at a #4 level so they need reduces minutes....but they have both shown the ability to play the PK. I think the problem we've always have had is that we've asked them to play too many minutes.

g/m...just go for the throat, all out offense..push the play.
z/j...squash in zone play, smother the puck, chip it out. They have got to get better at this. Both of them are capable of carrying the puck out of the d-zone. They should be forcing the play into the O-zone and if not creating much, at least force a face-off there.

Yeah I think it may be time to go full chaos (Girard-Makar). Bednar can do his usual blender with the pairs as needed, but with Girard struggling a bit with his puck decisions, it might be nice for him to have Makar as the main guy to get the puck out of the zone. I've noticed EJ almost always gives the puck to Girard rather than getting it out himself, and that's gotten G in trouble a few times. Z-EJ can be the true shut-down pair, and Graves-Cole can both play decently in the offensive and defensive zones, especially when playing a 3rd pairing role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xpatriatedtexan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad