What a terrible contract. And don't tell me "hindsight". Everyone knew that this would happen at some point. He's made of glass. It looks like my 35 points a season prediction was sadly optimistic.
Getting injured and not playing hockey for a year and a half is going to make Ruutu even slower than before. He's going to be like Rod Brind'amour circa 2010, only worse defensively.
Just gotta hope for that amnesty clause in the new CBA, gotta think JR's gonna be pushing that one pretty hard now.
He's been hurting since August and has surgery now? When it's obvious this is all coming to an end one way or another? Why not 4 months ago? Rutherford sounds like this caught him off guard. He can't be happy at all. We were looking kinda stacked.
Maybe he slipped and fell. Maybe he tweaked it and had it looked at and realized it was serious? We shouldn't assume he just "put it off" til now like he didn't care...
Once again, stubbornness has taken a toll for this team. Aside from Ruutu's indecision to immediately act on his injury, JR's to blame by trying to control his fate. By no means am I inferring that JR injured Ruutu, but his stupidity has cost us. Rather than forgiving himself, he tries to compensate the loss of Cole through another grinder/sniper in Ruutu. Same with his impatience in the JJ saga where he downgrades to Gleason rather than waiting another couple years. Just to imagine that we couldve had JStaal and Sutter barring Gleason and an injured Ruutu is disappointing. (Pittsburgh wanted Ladd and Johnson prior to Sutter, Dumoulin, and 8th for Staal IIRC)
Do you know what they say about hindsight?
Lots of people were saying the same thing when it happened. How about Jim Rutherford uses some foresight for once? Like figuring out that a guy made out of glass who skates like Craig Adams and scored a whopping 34 points might not be the best player to sign for $4.75M/yr long term, regardless of what physicality he may bring once every five games when he actually is in the lineup.Do you know what they say about hindsight?
Lots of people were saying the same thing when it happened. How about Jim Rutherford uses some foresight for once? Like figuring out that a guy made out of glass who skates like Craig Adams and scored a whopping 34 points might not be the best player to sign for $4.75M/yr long term, regardless of what physicality he may bring once every five games when he actually is in the lineup.
Did TheBigKahuna's post force the team to announce this? Odd timing.