Cam98
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2009
- 2,596
- 242
Interesting situation with Russel ...our over paid third pairing guy that maybe could play second pairing on a few teams.....maybe Russel signs a one year lower priced extension and we make a deal with Seattle to take him....works for Russel to stay close ....Neal's contract is immovable. Nobody is taking that contract without the Oilers adding a ton of sweeteners.
Hell, it took a 1st to move 1 year of Marleau.
Russell is the contract that can realistically be moved this off-season and I don't think that will be easy either especially with the modified NTC.
Except what you describe is not what happened,. He had the vast majority of his ES points playing with either Tavares or Matthews. This year he has 2 goals and 10 points 5 vs . All of them are while playing with Matthews. In fact he has played more minutes per game 5 vs 5 this year than he did last year..
First Andreas first full year was last year.....he scored 43 points in 73 games playing from the third line (20 of those points were goals).....this year with the way TO is built his time got reduced....
But what Andreas brings is speed and hands and willingness to play inside and he is very good defensively...these are all qualities McDavid can take advantage of ...with Andreas always going back hard it means less legs for McDavid ...which means he is fresher for the third period and on the PP...
Second Shanahan not an idiot....the management there for sure is a little desperate on D and we can take advantage....dont think they will trade sapphires for pig iron....(that might be a little extreme)
Nailed it.
Johnsson is a tweener who plays with elite players and puts up middling numbers. Benning is a strong 3rd pair RHD. Not sure why there is a discrepancy in their value.
Real talk
Andreas Johnsson has 10 points at 5v5 in just under 500 minutes where he has been attached at the hip to Auston Matthews and William Nylander.
Joakim Nygard has 7 points at 5v5 in just over 300 minutes where his most common linemates are Riley Sheahan and Alex Chaisson.
I think Johnsson could be a good depth add for the Oilers. But he's not the player some make him out to be.
Then you need to keep Russell for next year though. That’s the problem.Interesting situation with Russel ...our over paid third pairing guy that maybe could play second pairing on a few teams.....maybe Russel signs a one year lower priced extension and we make a deal with Seattle to take him....works for Russel to stay close ....
If thats in the cards maybe we could even look at that 1B....say Georgiev for Pulju and a second.....cause right now we cant.....Seattle just pickup Georgiev....
Krieder has already extended the middle finger.....He was the obvious choice when we took Magnus....LOLWhats the possibility Oilers try and acquire Kreider?
I don't think that deal is nearly so far fetched as some might. Toronto's right side is a disaster and it will be worse next year since they almost surely lose Barrie and Ceci. Holl is a 27 year old rookie who had some success playing mostly bottom pairing minutes. Everyone got all excited and then he re-signed and was eventually moved up the food chain. The Leafs went on a bit of a roll but have fallen back to earth. Justin Holl is now their top pairing RHD right now and we saw how well he played in that roll.
Benning is at least a guy with an NHL level track record. He's not a top pairing guy but he could be a passible #4 if they pair him with Muzzin next year. (Assuming they do re-sign Muzzin). He also a lot more physical than any Leaf defenseman which is something they might like. Straight-up Benning is not worth Johnsson but this deal also saves the Leafs $1.5M in cap space which for them is huge. As it is today, when Muzzin and Riley in the Leafs, are over the cap on a 23 man roster so they may have to do something a bit rash. Probably have to add a pick from the Oilers to make it work but I don't think Benning for Johnsson is that far off as a foundation. Johnsson is a small winger with 16 points making $3.4M. Leaf fans seem to think he would bring back a sure fire top 4 defenseman, or a 1st, or a blue chip. But frankly I don't see his value being anywhere close to that since he is a second line/third line tweener on most NHL teams.
How long did people say all that stuff about Lucic, too? Neal's contract isn't even buyout proof either. I think people really need to move beyond the "That can never happen" mentality as more times than not, the impossible things in sports usually do happen. You can almost guarantee that when someone says something will never happen, it's probably going to happen.Neal's contract is immovable. Nobody is taking that contract without the Oilers adding a ton of sweeteners.
Hell, it took a 1st to move 1 year of Marleau. Neal is undoubtedly sticking around for a couple of years unless they buy him out.
Russell is the contract that can realistically be moved this off-season and I don't think that will be easy either especially with the modified NTC.
How long did people say all that stuff about Lucic, too? Neal's contract isn't even buyout proof either. I think people really need to move beyond the "That can never happen" mentality as more times than not, the impossible things in sports usually do happen.
I'd say the Neal for Lucic swap worked swimmingly for Edmonton. Neal's contract really seems like a moot point. Obviously nobody is taking a contract like that for free, and nobody said it would happen that way because that's silly.They traded Lucic for another awful contract. If they trade Neal, it will be for another awful contract. Nobody is taking Neal for free. It's completely unrealistic.
You could probably pay Seattle to take him next year with a first round pick.They traded Lucic for another awful contract. If they trade Neal, it will be for another awful contract. Nobody is taking Neal for free. It's completely unrealistic.
I'd say the Neal for Lucic swap worked swimmingly for Edmonton. Neal's contract really seems like a moot point. Obviously nobody is taking a contract like that for free, and nobody said it would happen that way because that's silly.
But I really would have thought people would stop with the "That will never happen" statements as 90% of the time they're so wrong it's funny.
I think it’s funny when people base contracts on points alone. And don’t take into account all the other areas of a game so called player brings to the table.Then say goodbye to the 20-25 point player making $3.5MM...
When I see James Neal, I see a guy that multiple cup contenders decided was a good addition to their rosters that made deep playoff runs. Is he maybe more of a PP specialist now? Sure. But the man knows how to score goals, and I don't really care how he gets them because 20-30 goals is 20-30 goals. I doubt GMs and coaches around the league talk about PP points as a negative on players abilities like HF seems to.People are talking about unloading Neal's contract, selling "high"on him as if he has any value. Any trade of Neal isn't likely to create cap space which would be the whole point of making the trade.
Is something like Neal for Eriksson or Okposo enticing? Seems pointless to make a trade like that since Neal is a decent fit here.
Zero. He has every Canadian team on his NTC.Whats the possibility Oilers try and acquire Kreider?
I have played with and against many players who have played in this league, with some still playing. Hell, I even played in a best-on-best tournament with one of the current Oilers. Please don't try to diminish my hockey ability/knowledge because I don't think a 3rd line winger is worth $3MM.I think it’s funny when people base contracts on points alone. And don’t take into account all the other areas of a game so called player brings to the table.
Those who base everything about a player based on points have likely never played the sport to a higher degree.
When I see James Neal, I see a guy that multiple cup contenders decided was a good addition to their rosters that made deep playoff runs. Is he maybe more of a PP specialist now? Sure. But the man knows how to score goals, and I don't really care how he gets them because 20-30 goals is 20-30 goals. I doubt GMs and coaches around the league talk about PP points as a negative on players abilities like HF seems to.
That's why it kills me the way Calgary handled him. Like, the Pens, Preds and Knights all thought this guy could help them and he's seen multiple cup finals because of it, yet he gets to Calgary and their depth is so strong that he doesn't really belong? Laughable.
If a 20-30 goal scorer costs the Oilers the price of his contract for a couple more years, so be it. It's not ideal but I hardly see it as a team killer.
Sorry, didn't mean to make it sound like I was putting words in your mouth. But a lot of people around here try and act like points on the PP aren't actually a positive and use it to argue that a PP guy like Neal isn't actually very useful, which I vehemently disagree with.I didn't say that his PP production is a negative or that he's a team killer. In fact, I think he has fit in well as a leader.
I'm just saying that a 3 year $5.75m contract for a 33+ year old PP specialist who is ideally a 3rd liner at even strength isn't moveable unless it's for a similarly bad contract. I actually like Neal in the proper role (not in the top 6) but he's a $2.5-3m player at this point in his career.
San Jose is really going to give up a lottery pick to Ottawa, aren’t they?
Whats the possibility Oilers try and acquire Kreider?
Benning is a sheltered #6, he has always gotten torched when playing on a 2nd pairing. The reason why he has played better this season is because Tippett lowered his minutes. I don't see why Dubas would have any interest in trading Johnsson for a #6. Larsson is their target I'd imagine.
Benning is a sheltered #6, he has always gotten torched when playing on a 2nd pairing. The reason why he has played better this season is because Tippett lowered his minutes. I don't see why Dubas would have any interest in trading Johnsson for a #6. Larsson is their target I'd imagine.
Cap savings.
If there's interest in Johnsson, we should probably look back to last season when there was rumored interest in Brown. Toronto wanted Khaira and Benning, Gretzky refused. I don't see a whole lot of a gap between Johnsson and Brown. Honestly, Brown brings more to the table.
That being said, where does Johnsson fit long-term?