I was talking with a scout last week about the college hockey conferences . He called the Big 10 conference the no defense conference . I said Ohio played defense and he said there are a few teams but Penn St , Michigan St . Minn Gophers , Wisconcin and Michigan just look to score and won't win anything in the NCAA's till they start focusing more on preventing goals . Said Notre Dame and Ohio did and that's why they win the conference .
Wisconsin plays an up-tempo style that you can attribute to any combination of talent mix, poor goaltending, necessity, poor coaching, whatever. They gave up a lot of goals last season but also scored at a pretty average rate, especially the forwards. You could argue that without Kalynuk/Miller, they'd be even more lost. They're just not a good team. I imagine they will continue to try to outscore their flaws. At least adding 2 elite offensive talents will help.
Ohio State plays super low event under Rohlik. Doesn't score, doesn't let up goals. They're disciplined, and it works -- I'll give them that. They're also mind numbingly boring and have basically 1 NHL-caliber player on their roster (only 2 draft picks and 1 wasn't even signed).
I'm not saying this was your point, but it's hard to ascribe the NHL capabilities of individual players based on these teams. What works in college also doesn't work in the NHL (see: Hakstok, Dwayne). OSU, for example, has a lot of older players and conservative schemes and atrocious puck moving on the back end. There's nothing NHL about the talent or style. Meanwhile, you've seen plenty of crappy Boston University teams full of young NHL talent. Or look at Hughes on Michigan. The common theme is they play a lot and can work out the kinks in a looser environment.
21 year old and outscored by an 18 year old freshman defenseman on his own team who's a real prospect.
He was outpaced, not outscored, in 11 less games. At least be accurate. That freshman is also world class in physical tools and a former forward who is raw on the details. But you do you.
As said above, and you say this all the time too, points aren't the best way to judge defenseman, especially across college divisions. You've already been proven wrong that his numbers are in fact good. You don't watch him, so I'm not sure what significant input you have on the rest.