GapToothedWonder
Registered User
And that's fair and that's fine. If he turns into a bottom pair defender that plays the PK, this pick will look like a good pick. Anything more is gravy. Anything worse is a bummer, especially if someone like Thomas or Groulx lights it up. That's the draft though. Educated guessing.
My problem with it is that in my opinion the best educated guess is to find somebody who shows the ability to efficiently use their feet and passing abilities to be able to escape pressure and transition the puck and then teach them proper defensive technique. But lots of older NHL minds haven't shifted their paradigm yet. They still believe that you can use guys that have plus defensive skills but not the ability to relieve forecheck pressure.
It's nicely summed up by this commercial
I think people who still value old school defensive players are still trying to sell CDs. People who realize that modern day defensive D-men need to be able to play as transition players as well see the future and realize thats where you should invest.
You don't need 6 first pairing Dmen you just need your lower pairing guys to have just enough puck skills that they aren't detriments in the transition game
So to me you can still have your opinion on CDs and truly believe in it, but you would be better off in coming around to the future.