Sorry I’m on a Carchidi rant today, but seriously? If he actually wanted Boldy would he not have taken him at 11??? With the top 10 of this draft, York was in his T10?
It was Adam Warlock who said he's a 3rd or 4th round type pick. My apologies to you.quote me where I said that loud mouth.
quote me where I said that York 3-4 round pick...
Resolved.It was Adam Warlock who said he's a 3rd or 4th round type pick. My apologies to you.
I meant if youre targeting a 2nd pair offensive dman, you can get one in the 3rd round.
More like 3rd pair defensemen like Gostisbehere.I meant if youre targeting a 2nd pair offensive dman, you can get one in the 3rd round.
Carchidi always has to get his opinion in there.View attachment 239179
Sorry I’m on a Carchidi rant today, but seriously? If he actually wanted Boldy would he not have taken him at 11??? With the top 10 of this draft, York was in his T10?
Usually yeah. But the USNTDP usually cross trains their dmen.York is typically a LD, right? I'm seeing conflicting reports.
More offensive, less physical. I thought about it though.
More offensive, less physical. I thought about it though.
I don't really have a comparable. A lot of people say Fowler, but he doesn't skate like that.
I meant if youre targeting a 2nd pair offensive dman, you can get one in the 3rd round.
A top 15 pick? You gotta go for most upside...and York doesnt have it. And even if he does...hes not gonna hit it here behind Provorov, Sanheim, Myers, and Ghost.
More offensive, less physical. I thought about it though.
I don't really have a comparable. A lot of people say Fowler, but he doesn't skate like that.
It's more Caulfield being availablei dont even have to read any post to know everyones complaining simply because he's a D
People need to calm down. This was not a bad pick.
Just look at the Flyers twitter. It's pathetic. Most of them probably have no idea who he is. But Caufield "scores goals"...i dont even have to read any post to know everyones complaining simply because he's a D
Good version of Matt Carle.What about Ty Smith or Samuel Girard? Those names jump out at me in all 3-zones. They're more intelligent, smallish puck movers with poise and some pop than true dynamos.
Nah. Fabbro's not that skilled. Huge melon on that kid too.That's why I was maybe thinking closer to Fabbro?