Yultron
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2017
- 1,618
- 1,477
Yep. Clearly what's being said.
Acting like a 6 year veteran who has been one of the worst players in his own zone in the league all 6 years is some player we shouldn't explore trading because he flips tires in the off season is grasping at nothing.
Also, Virtanen was reported to have character issues iirc. Something that can get blown out of proportion with young players sometimes, but is still a red flag.I haven't watched Vancouver at all these past few years, but my memory of virtanen as a prospect was all tools, no toolbox. Has he progressed?
If not, I fear we would need an extremely high IQ center to work with him, which is something we're lacking at the moment. It would be the Evander Kane situation all over again.
Also, Virtanen was reported to have character issues iirc. Something that can get blown out of proportion with young players sometimes, but is still a red flag.
I would do Nylander for Virtanen
There was talk on here in his player thread and on reddit of him partying too much and having weight/conditioning issues. Some of it documented apparently on his own later deleted social media.Can you find that report? Not doubting you.
It just would be interesting as to who the “report” was from. Some legit source, or a poser with a Twitter account, or something else...
Nylander for Tierney and a 2nd.
Take out Tierney and you have something close to fair value.
That's because Tierney's nothing specialI'm as down on Nylander as anyone... disliked the pick from the moment it was made. But he's not worth just a 2nd.
Not that Sens fans are the be all-end all, but their board makes this deal all day.
That's because Tierney's nothing special
I'm as down on Nylander as anyone... disliked the pick from the moment it was made. But he's not worth just a 2nd.
Not that Sens fans are the be all-end all, but their board makes this deal all day.
Assuming Ottawa has their own 2nd here but that's basically a late 1st. I would say that's very close to Nylander's value at this point. Look around at the amount of recent 1st round picks, even high ones, that have gotten traded for almost nothing just a few years after being drafted. There's a point of no return with many of these picks where you can either recoup a small portion of what you paid to draft them or they're basically throw aways in trades. Nylander is quickly approaching that. Dylan Strome did a hell of a lot more in the AHL and he was packaged with #12 overall Perlini for #20 overall Schmaltz. Which is probably part of the reason Botteril is keeping Nylander in the AHL. Because he will tank his value even more struggling in the NHL the same way Strome and Perlini did.
If Nylander stays on pace he'll match Strome's last season in Tucson. Same age in AHL production.
I would just trade Nylander before he's worth nothing
I'd love to add Virtanen but that price is just a tad steep only because Nylander holds more value I'd imagine around the league at this point. I'm not a Nylander believer and would do that swap on a personal level today, but I also view Nylander as a great potential trade chip for a higher end player and that's my only reasoning for saying no to this.
NO WAY Vancouver ever considers this!What would make you think Hughes is the throw in? I think Risto is worth more than Hughes so the add is Virtanen.
Friedman says Dallas is shopping Janmark, he’s blindingly fast and played a lot of center in Sweden. Having a rough year but has definitely shown he can score in the past. Worth a look?
I think Nylander is being kept in Rochester because he will fall flat in Buffalo, and Botterill is hoping to increase his trade value by collecting points in the AHL...except Nylander is ruining that plan right now. Worst draft selection since Persson over Nick Foligno.
Friedman says Dallas is shopping Janmark, he’s blindingly fast and played a lot of center in Sweden. Having a rough year but has definitely shown he can score in the past. Worth a look?