Beerz
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2011
- 35,300
- 10,877
Did everyone rushing to dunk on that take completely miss the “Patrick Berglund can replace Ryan O’Reilly because ES goals” that preceded that statement or...?
Apologies.
Yes I did miss that.
Did everyone rushing to dunk on that take completely miss the “Patrick Berglund can replace Ryan O’Reilly because ES goals” that preceded that statement or...?
Hopefully less ice time does the trick. He was 6th in ES and overall ice time for the Blues. He played 14:19mins a night at ES and 17:07 overall last year.Sobotka's decline even over the course of this past spring is pretty alarming. I hope he'll be refreshed playing on a new team, but there's a real chance he doesn't last long in the lineup, especially if a couple of kids surprise.
Right?!?! I mean his dad was a linebacker, how is it that Bailey doesn't play like a military grade destroyer (a la Tom Wilson)?
Considering that by all accounts Carlton Bailey never played a big role in Justin's life, I don't see why his football position would have much influence on Justin's playing style.
dotcom is right. Bailey's dad wasn't really around much at all during his upbringing. I think they might still be estranged but on speaking terms. IE: not good but not horrid.
Surprised you aren't a pro scout with this level of insightfulness
They could easily bounce back in a larger and different role this year. They were both kind of lost in the shuffle in STL and this could provide a spark for them. Of course it's no guarantee but neither is it a guarantee that they are bad. They were both full time players with 16+ minutes a game for a team way better than us. We can all see the analytics, but it's all you seem to put any stock into whatsoever. You say Jaskin is an amazing defensive forward yet he averages 3 seconds of PK time over 76 games! Meanwhile "bad" Sobotka and Berglund are both around a minute of pk time a game and if you remove the traded Stastny both were top 6 forwards by even strength and PP ice time.
I guess what I meant is that the Blues are a veteran-heavy team while the Sabres are young and in need of some veteran guidance. In this sense it might be a bit of a different challenge for these guys to take on more of a leadership role knowing that they were targeted as vets to help a young team. They were both a bit stale in St LouisWhat do you mean by bigger role and lost in the shuffle?
My understanding from blues fans and articles, is that they played more and in bigger roles than they could handle, due to a ton of injuries.
I guess what I meant is that the Blues are a veteran-heavy team while the Sabres are young and in need of some veteran guidance. In this sense it might be a bit of a different challenge for these guys to take on more of a leadership role knowing that they were targeted as vets to help a young team. They were both a bit stale in St Louis
I am hoping Botterill can acquire a RHD with a defensive-orientation. Somebody like Pysyk. Pair him with Scandella and let them eat tough minutes.
Hoping it looks something like a quantity for quality deal. 3 for 1. Maybe 3 if Bailey, Baptiste, Nylander, McCabe packaged in some way.
Quite possibly yes. You're suggesting that players never get revitalized by moving to a new team or new role?So they will play well because they will be in a mentor role?
Would Florida do something like
Bogo with a million retained and a 2nd for Pysyk?
I don't think so. Pysyk was just illustrative of the type of defenseman who could work as the #4. Actually getting Pysyk would take more than just Bogosian. And the Sabres don't have a 2nd in 2019.
Elite players dont need to be sheltered. Eichel was our 1C for all intensive purposes day 1, Dahlin can at worst be on the 2nd pair. Top 4 lol, maybe dont rely on him to be the #1, but not being in the top 4 is laughableIt would be in the Sabres best interests to not have Dahlin starting in the top 4. What happens if he struggles early on? Is a McCabe - Bogo 2nd pairing really going to hold down the fort for 30-40 games while Scandella - Risto get loaded with 25+ minutes a night? That's a very possible nightmare scenario. Add in the fact that Bogo has been consistently injured, and it could be a disaster on the back end. A lot is riding on Dahlin being an effective top 4 d man right off the bat.
I'm not saying Dahlin can't handle those minutes, but its irresponsible for an organization to throw their 18 year old franchise defenseman to the wolves in his first year. In my opinion, top 4 D is still a big need.
Saying Dahlin should play on the 3rd pairing is like saying Eichel should play on the third line 3 summers ago. Dahlin is going to play top 4 minutes right away. He's a phenom and those guys make an instant impact. There is no more major moves in the pipeline the cap is too tight to add a big contract. Scandella, Risto, Dahlin, Bogo and McCabe can handle top 4 duties. I want to see what Dahlin has and that means he needs 16-17 mins at ES and ample PP time. 19-20 minutes his rookie year is on the Low end of the spectrum, I can see him getting 22 minutes a game.
damn that trade was so bad, mainly because it was so unnecessary, and it's still haunting us. but...hey, Pyser's corsi was negative last year, and here's to Asplund becoming a really good NHL player *clinks beers*
Quite possibly yes. You're suggesting that players never get revitalized by moving to a new team or new role?
I wouldn't be shocked after the first or second game hearing someone say Dahlin would be better in Rochester for the season.
It would be in the Sabres best interests to not have Dahlin starting in the top 4. What happens if he struggles early on? Is a McCabe - Bogo 2nd pairing really going to hold down the fort for 30-40 games while Scandella - Risto get loaded with 25+ minutes a night? That's a very possible nightmare scenario. Add in the fact that Bogo has been consistently injured, and it could be a disaster on the back end. A lot is riding on Dahlin being an effective top 4 d man right off the bat.
I'm not saying Dahlin can't handle those minutes, but its irresponsible for an organization to throw their 18 year old franchise defenseman to the wolves in his first year. In my opinion, top 4 D is still a big need.
We don't need them to take over the room, We just need them to set an example with good habits and work ethic and use their experience to help out where they can. Say what you will about Gionta but the team got much worse when he left.Considering their age, the team they came from, and the disciplined structure they were once a part of, and their better than average coaching, and now they are tasked to go to an undisciplined, defensive defecent team with below average coaching who couldn’t make judgement call on who should be captain, and you expect them to be revitalized? Nothing about this team, especially right now, screams we’re an organization that is capable of having guys come in and take ownership of a room.
Hell, a respected vet like Gionta couldn’t get through to help shape our guys better and we still have a large collection of players still here that were reportedly a major issue of that problem, namely Eichel.
I still trade the offensive limited RHD that couldn’t jump Bogo in the depth chart, for a (at the time) Top 4 player who has been playing that role for a bit to shore up the LD.
But I’m sure Murray just knew that he was going to have a freak injury that derailed his whole season and didn’t allow him to be 100% because of a bench door...
I don't mean to have a referendum on Kulikov. I agree - he had a freak injury that presumably hampered him all year (and possibly still does, who knows - back injuries are extremely problematic). But, the point is, the trade was just not necessary. Pysyk does not score - this is true. But, he had good underlying stats. The thing about Pysyk was that he was *effective* and *didn't cost much* and *is right handed.* Are we not clamoring for a player exactly like that right now?