Well, that's plenty. Yemelin was a key component for many reasons at his peak years in Montreal. We don't have this X factor anymore. Ask Lucy what he thought of Alexei.We should not expect to mush from Romanov, All scouts are saying the same thing that he will be a Alexei Yemelin 2.0 but with more offence
We should not expect to mush from Romanov, All scouts are saying the same thing that he will be a Alexei Yemelin 2.0 but with more offence
And Weal will see.New toy for the fans. In a year he’ll be like KK. Lol
This 100%...the kid dominated WJC 2 years straight...played in the KHL with men...someone said Emelin 2.0???...more towards the Markov side with less offence...he is the future anchor of our D. After Weber and Petry he is our 3rd best D right now. He does not need AHL...he spent 2 years playing with men and his body is big enough to handle NHL.I read some forum on rds, etc...and it's crazy of how many posters did not seen him play.....
Jeez, we had 2 world juniors To see him and people have only watched highlights of him...
I watched every single game of Romanov at the world juniors in the last 2 years...and man.....I love this kid so much. His attitude is perfect and he will be a fan favorite
We have to get back Kovalchuk man, it's mucho importante!I suggested last year that the Habs should sign Kovalchuk just to be that mentor for Romanov and Suzuki.......and why not KK
If Mete puts on a 5-8 lbs of muscle and improves his shot this summer, while still keeping his mobility intact or even improving it, and perhaps does it again the following summer, he will make a strong case to stay in the line-up. I think that Mete is the better complement for Weber as Chiarot is for Petry, given how their strengths mesh together. With Romanov joining the team, it's shaping up as at least a decent-skating defensive squad. What the team needs above all is an offensive star and perhaps inspired (or inspirational) coaching.If Mete is back to form of his two previous seasons, it'd be a mistake to put chiarot there. Mete in his first two seasons was miles ahead defensively and while Chiarot is better offensively, it's negligible compared to the difference defensively. Mete has been by far Weber's best partner over the last 3 years and by a fair margin.
And whether it was Chiarot or Mete, our biggest problem is finding the right partner for Petry. In the last three seasons, Petry's overall defensively play has sucked with whoever was paired up with him, and those pairing mates have fared about the same.
I'd try Weber-Mete once more and try Romanov with Petry. Chiarot is super efficient on a 3rd pairing.
If Mete is back to form, that's your best bet for a strong d-corps.
And for anyone disagreeing with me, please go look at our D's GAA in their respective roles. Weber-Mete is miles ahead of any pairing we've had since Markov left.
This 100%...the kid dominated WJC 2 years straight...played in the KHL with men...someone said Emelin 2.0???...more towards the Markov side with less offence...he is the future anchor of our D. After Weber and Petry he is our 3rd best D right now. He does not need AHL...he spent 2 years playing with men and his body is big enough to handle NHL.
Mete is a good guy, plaisant personality, works hard, intelligent, etc but we can't have him on first pairing D. Too bad for him but he's just doesn't have enough weight to do such a job. I would try Romanov before using Mete again.Bergevin better hope Romanov works out and eventually goes on the top pairing or that Mete goes back to his previous form, because Chiarot should be nowhere near a first pairing.
Some here seem inamoured with the mobile dman, but his underlying defensive numbers on the first and second pairing making it clear we won't ever win a championship woth him on the first pairing.
This 100%...the kid dominated WJC 2 years straight...played in the KHL with men...someone said Emelin 2.0???...more towards the Markov side with less offence...he is the future anchor of our D. After Weber and Petry he is our 3rd best D right now. He does not need AHL...he spent 2 years playing with men and his body is big enough to handle NHL.
He played 2 years great years in the KHL after his draft year. He doesn’t need to go to Laval. He’s ready for the NHL.Nice. Would be nice to have him play on the 1st pair in Laval but who am I kidding, it's the Habs way to rush him.
He played 2 years great years in the KHL after his draft year. He doesn’t need to go to Laval. He’s ready for the NHL.
It’s the same thing with Suzuki. He had 2 great years in the OHL after his draft year but everyone was sure he needed to play in Laval first. That would’ve been a mistake.
Chiarot with Weber didnt work. Stop saying that. Oh yeah they produced offensively, but defensively they were a total wreck compared to when Mete was with Weber.
Suzuki also dominated the OHL whereas Romanovs 11 points in 86 games isn't exactly earth shattering. I'm aware that you can't evaluate a guy like Romanov this way, but he's got a lot to prove besides his WJC that he's NHL ready. Suzuki on the other hand had a better track record but was also very impressive at camp.He played 2 years great years in the KHL after his draft year. He doesn’t need to go to Laval. He’s ready for the NHL.
It’s the same thing with Suzuki. He had 2 great years in the OHL after his draft year but everyone was sure he needed to play in Laval first. That would’ve been a mistake.
We'll see. During his first camp, Suzuki seemed overwhelmed.Suzuki also dominated the OHL whereas Romanovs 11 points in 86 games isn't exactly earth shattering. I'm aware that you can't evaluate a guy like Romanov this way, but he's got a lot to prove besides his WJC that he's NHL ready. Suzuki on the other hand had a better track record but was also very impressive at camp.