Rochester Americans and Jacksonville Icemen 2023-24 Season Thread

[SonofHerb]

Umm.

 

[joshjull]

I think he kicked it but it hit the goalie’s stick before going in.

 

[Ralonzo]

Lol, Sabres never get that call, for or against.

Why play "Let It Be" for a goal chalked off by the ref and under review. Would you not want the call overturned, instead of let the decision stand?

 

[Zman5778]

Got here JUST before the goal? No goal?

From one angle, it sure looked like he kicked it -- but I can't tell what pixel is the puck and what pixel is a foot.

 

[misterchainsaw]

Looked like a pretty clear kick to me. Seems ridiculous that the goalie touching it trying to stop it would cancel it.

 

[joshjull]

I thought it would count hitting the goalies stick before going in. Right?

 

[Fearnot]

Ive seen more deliberate called a good goal.

 

[Ace]

I don’t buy that someone trying to hit a puck with their stick is intentionally kicking at the same time.

It’s not physically possible

 

[Zman5778]

Yeah, that's a pretty clear kick

 

[SonofHerb]

Probably a good call, but damn.

 

[Sabre the Win]

I would be curious to see how they rule that call for Syracuse

 

[misterchainsaw]

I thought it would count hitting the goalies stick before going in. Right?

Straight from the NHL rulebook: Plays that involve a puck entering the net as a direct result of a “distinct kicking motion” shall be ruled NO GOAL.

A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official.

I'd be hard pressed to say it that the goal wasn't scored because of anything other than a distinct kicking motion.

 

[joshjull]

 

[Chainshot]

They needed that.

 

[Sabreality]

that'll count!

 

[Zman5778]

CALL THAT ONE BACK, F***ERS!!!!!!!!

 

[Gabrielor]

I could use the series as evidence that faceoff wins matter.

 

[joshjull]

Straight from the NHL rulebook: Plays that involve a puck entering the net as a direct result of a “distinct kicking motion” shall be ruled NO GOAL.

A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official.

I'd be hard pressed to say it that the goal wasn't scored because of anything other than a distinct kicking motion.

Thank you

 

[SonofHerb]

How could that be a goal? He hit that in with his stick.

 

[joshjull]

Yes

 

[Chainshot]

I get the kick being no goal. It looked like a kick, they called it a kick. No problem.

 

[joshjull]

damn a penalty

 

[misterchainsaw]

I don't think the refs have missed anything of note yet. The disputed offsides was offside (the passer entered the zone before the puck got in because it got caught up in skates), and all 3 goal/no goal calls looked correct.

 

[Sabre the Win]

I get the kick being no goal. It looked like a kick, they called it a kick. No problem.

I saw no distinct kicking motion, all he did was turn his leg to try and direct the puck to his stick. This has been called a goal more often then not in the NHL.

 

[Beerz]

The penalty calls in a game "7" elimination playoff game is certainly a choice