Rielly's year?

meefer

Registered User
Jun 9, 2015
4,714
4,655
Bangkok
Making predictions is a mug's game, so it's about time I started living up/down to my talents.

*Morgan Rielly will establish himself as a true #1 [edit, due to confusion as to what I meant: top 10 in the league, without argument] quality Dman in the NHL during the 2018/19 season.*

Physically strong, now experienced, having developed some quality leadership character, he'll now be playing with the strongest group of players he's had as a Leaf. Babcock, Imo, will lean more on Rielly than ever before. I see Morgs becoming a part of the 2nd unit PK, continuing his role facing the toughest players on the other teams, will spell - if not start - on the right side as Babcock realizes that Hainsey cannot deal with the minutes throughout a season that he was given on a nightly basis last year. Rielly will continue to excel on the PP and I expect that he'll average +23/24 min/game by the end of the season. I expect his point total to increase as his usage expands. His motivation, given the quality of his team mates, will be at an all time high and I think this will propel him to showing Babs that he is the defenseman that should be on the ice when it matters most. While no Duncan Keith in the nasty department, I see Morgan becoming more physical and in fact, while thinking of Keith, I anticipate Rielly's development this year to be somewhat similar to Keith's in the late 00s.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SHANNYPLAN

Community

44 is Rielly good
Oct 30, 2010
6,774
1,683
The Darkest Timeline
*Morgan Rielly will establish himself as a true #1 quality Dman in the NHL during the 2018/19 season.*

Sorry OP, I stopped reading after this line.

Rielly has already established himself as a true #1. There have even been recent analysts that ranked him as #18 (with questionable defensemen ahead of him) when comparing him to each teams top defenseman (which would put him in the 20-22 range since teams like NSH have 2 dmen better than Rielly).

The only people that dont agree either dislike the Leafs, have not seen enough of Rielly, people who have strict criteria which ends up only consisting of like 15 #1dmen for some reason, or think there are more guys ahead of Rielly until they actually put a list together.

Edit: A 50pt defenseman that has a decent defensive game (albeit still could be improved) ans plays against the top competition is easily a #1 dman. Not to mention he doesnt get insane PP time like some other PP specialists do.
 

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
I'll say he affirms himself as a #1D, and starts to be recognized as one. What he did last year was no-doubt #1 quality defenseman results in brutal tough usage while carrying a partner who didn't belong, the only criticisms are that he played a little less time than you usually see #1Dmen play and that he's only done it once. 2 more minutes of icetime per game and another performance like last year would make it hard do doubt him
 

IPS

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
15,546
24,698
I'd like to see him play the most minutes on the team to confirm his #1D usage. And it needs to start by playing more minutes on the PK.

Our defense's usage as a whole is kind of weird.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slimbob8

frog

Registered User
Apr 8, 2014
2,436
1,451
Canada
Reilly is pretty overrated.. I would not call him a legit #1 defensemen. A quiet #2 is all ive seen. He still makes tons of mistakes and aside from the Capitals playoff series has never looked like a #1 defensmen
 

AustonMarner

Registered User
Sep 3, 2018
723
410
Hope the Leafs legit turn Reilly into Captain Morgan. Let Matthews and Tavares wear the A's. That way there will be know conflict between the teams two top centers.
 

Melo Meds

Registered User
Jul 30, 2018
1,136
928
Rielly is a number one dman right now, probably in the top 15-20. He’s still only 24 and is still in his upswing prime and continuously improving. Could crack 60 points this year with how deadly our PP will be.
 

MapleLeafs9

Registered User
Sep 22, 2011
7,740
4,231
He's not already a legitimate #1 D? That's news to me lol

He was the #1 defenceman with 52 points on the 7th best team in the league last season, but ok? My only gripe with Rielly is his shot, that's it, he does everything else exceptionally well that you'd want from an offensive #1 D.
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
21,206
23,629
Give him a reasonable RHD to play with, and that would be his coming out party.
 

Polaris1010

Registered User
Mar 23, 2017
3,800
1,300
grandma's cellar
Reilly is pretty overrated.. I would not call him a legit #1 defensemen. A quiet #2 is all ive seen. He still makes tons of mistakes and aside from the Capitals playoff series has never looked like a #1 defensmen
If Reilly is a really truly bona fide #1 defensemen, then obviously so was Dion Phaneuf!

Not much more to this thread I do not believe.

:dunce:
 

Buds17

Registered User
Nov 29, 2015
8,245
3,364
Think he's already a #1 D, but he can still feasibly work his way up even higher in the rankings. Expect he'll continue to be utilized on both special teams units. Can't imagine we've seen his best season yet either. Good leadership, great cap hit; he brings a lot to the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeynorth

airgordo

Registered User
Feb 4, 2015
47
21
Reilly is an excellent player. He’s improving every year. I would love for him to grab the bull the horns this year to establish himself as a keith-petro-doughty type defenseman.

He’s just entering into his prime and other defensemen in the league are only getting older.
 

TootooTrain

Sandpaper
Jun 12, 2010
35,505
461
"He's not a #1."
"He absolutely is a #1."

He's Morgan Rielly. And he's great dman. No need to label.

As for expectations for this upcoming season, as long as he continues to be the Mo we know, I'm fine with that.
 

meefer

Registered User
Jun 9, 2015
4,714
4,655
Bangkok
To those who've said 'he's already a #1' or words to that effect, I agree with you. My OP was meant to indicate that this year his play will leave no doubt as to the quality of defenseman he is and that his value will be recognized by all. See, I told ya it's a mug's game :)
 

Crease Master

Registered User
Dec 17, 2016
700
417
What doesn't make him a #1 D?
He shoots the puck like hot wet garbage. Compare his shooting percentage to other top defencemen, he's lacking quite a bit. He's all about skating the puck into the zone and dishing as soon as possible which is fine for a guy who isn't your number one defenceman, but your top guy needs to be able to put the puck at the net or make a play rather than just hot potato it around the zone. Sure he gets points, but he doesn't produce them. There's a difference.
 

LeafingTheWay

Registered User
May 31, 2014
6,726
1,855
OP said 'true #1D'. That's very vague terms.

Most on here are comprehending that as a regular #1D. He's already that. OP is talking about the elite #1D like Doughty, Karlsson, Hedman, Subban type.
 

Ratboy

I made a funny!
Jul 15, 2009
16,855
3,343
Yeah his shot isn't great but his skating, puck skills and smarts make up for that.

He's kind of like a non Pejorative Slured Gardiner (minus the shot).
 

Diamond Joe Quimby

A$AP Joffrey
Aug 14, 2010
13,547
2,996
Washington, DC
Sorry OP, I stopped reading after this line.

Rielly has already established himself as a true #1. There have even been recent analysts that ranked him as #18 (with questionable defensemen ahead of him) when comparing him to each teams top defenseman (which would put him in the 20-22 range since teams like NSH have 2 dmen better than Rielly).

The only people that dont agree either dislike the Leafs, have not seen enough of Rielly, people who have strict criteria which ends up only consisting of like 15 #1dmen for some reason, or think there are more guys ahead of Rielly until they actually put a list together.

Edit: A 50pt defenseman that has a decent defensive game (albeit still could be improved) ans plays against the top competition is easily a #1 dman. Not to mention he doesnt get insane PP time like some other PP specialists do.

To be fair to the OP, I'm not sure one could be considered a true, legit #1 and not receive any Norris votes.

Still has plenty to prove, at least in the eyes of the members of the PHWA.
 

BAM

Registered User
Nov 21, 2016
4,048
2,299
To be fair to the OP, I'm not sure one could be considered a true, legit #1 and not receive any Norris votes.

Still has plenty to prove, at least in the eyes of the members of the PHWA.
To be fair, Provorov, Werenski and Lindholm didn't receive any votes either and people consider them 1D's as well
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad