Proposal: Rick Nash to Detroit
- Thread starter Gospel of Prospal
- Start date
SpookyTsuki
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2014
- 15,916
- 671
Ill take Rick Nash for Justin mantha and marchenko
I won't take Rick Nash for Anthony mantha and marchenko
Holland won't trade for Rick Nash unless he goes panic mode. Cause Rick Nash isn't that great.
I won't take Rick Nash for Anthony mantha and marchenko
Holland won't trade for Rick Nash unless he goes panic mode. Cause Rick Nash isn't that great.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
If you're talking Justin Abdelkader then it's not happening and weren't moving Mantha for an aging Rick Nash once again not happening. Would rather sign any one of Okposo, Eriksson or Ladd then trade for Rick Nash that ship sailed when he was dealt to the Rangers.
Haha I don't know what's funnier, the typo on mantha's name or the proposal itself.
If he meant Abby, he just signed a 7 year extension that starts this season - while I'm sure you'd find some wings fans who hate the contract that would rather eat a 2 year 6.25 mil Nash to get rid of it now, it ain't happenin.
If he meant Abby, he just signed a 7 year extension that starts this season - while I'm sure you'd find some wings fans who hate the contract that would rather eat a 2 year 6.25 mil Nash to get rid of it now, it ain't happenin.
Nash for Mantha, Pulkkinen, 3rd seems fair from my POV, but I'm sure some DET fans won't see the need. Not sure if DET & NYR are best trading partners. Both want to continue to get younger.
Vatican Roulette
Baile de Los Locos
Vatican Roulette
Baile de Los Locos
The Red Line
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2010
- 8,451
- 4,895
Lmao no that isn't remotely fair. Mantha is a prospect that will most likely be better than what Nash is now, that is brutal for Detroit.
A wise man once said yea no
Nash is still a very good 2 way player . Wings need some balls. Trade a few younger guys and take a risk in Nash
They have all gone grown players . Shake it up
BinCookin
Registered User
thats ridiculous. Look Nash was an amazing player, and now is an OK player that is overpaid.
Hes still better (more talented) than almost every Red Wing we have.
That being said....
The answer is NO, i don't want him. Don't care what the price is.
Gospel of Prospal
America's Team
Go Wings
Registered User
I wouldnt give you a 7th rounder for him at this point. He is very over paid and not what Detroit needs.
Vatican Roulette
Baile de Los Locos
It would have to be a salary dump kind of trade for NYR...
Nash @ 50% for a mid round pick and 2 B level prospects or something like that.
It's the same thing when it comes to Girardi. They're going to eat half or pair him with a very high ceiling young player like Chicago did to get rid of Bickell.
Nash @ 50% for a mid round pick and 2 B level prospects or something like that.
It's the same thing when it comes to Girardi. They're going to eat half or pair him with a very high ceiling young player like Chicago did to get rid of Bickell.
Glen Sathers Cigar
Sather 4 Ever
RWs do not want Nash except way below discount, and NY has suitors for him
only clear win win deal is Girardi + Raanta, 50% retained to .5, for Howard, which is similar $
G fits Det defense which is not AV style and will be fine if he does 3RD at 10ish mins per night not double + that.
Staal is also possible, not sure we can agree on that return.
only clear win win deal is Girardi + Raanta, 50% retained to .5, for Howard, which is similar $
G fits Det defense which is not AV style and will be fine if he does 3RD at 10ish mins per night not double + that.
Staal is also possible, not sure we can agree on that return.
