NickH8
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2015
- 3,661
- 3,793
Pretty much my thinking as well.Frk out, Vanek in calling it now..
I'd be okay with bringing in Vanek now that we have another spot open. He had some chemistry with AA and I loved him while he was here. And for those who don't want a single good player under the age of 25 on the team, Vanek doesn't make us improve by much at all. As long as we ice the same defense we're bottom 10 at least.Frk out, Vanek in calling it now..
If Vanek doesn't make us better, then whats the point of bringing him along? We have plenty of veteran presence so its not that.I'd be okay with bringing in Vanek now that we have another spot open. He had some chemistry with AA and I loved him while he was here. And for those who don't want a single good player under the age of 25 on the team, Vanek doesn't make us improve by much at all. As long as we ice the same defense we're bottom 10 at least.
The only player on our team that outscored Vanek last year was Larkin.If Vanek doesn't make us better, then whats the point of bringing him along? We have plenty of veteran presence so its not that.
I wouldn't go out of my way to get him, I'm just okay with Holland giving him a fair 1 year deal if that's his jam. I'd prefer Svechnikov to come up but I understand he had a bad season and could use another year.If Vanek doesn't make us better, then whats the point of bringing him along? We have plenty of veteran presence so its not that.
Does Vanek get us into the playoffs? I'll answer for you, no he doesn't. The only thing he does is worsen our draft position buy a spot or two and keep a kid from playing.The only player on our team that outscored Vanek last year was Larkin.
Does that make your point right now or something?Does Vanek get us into the playoffs? I'll answer for you, no he doesn't. The only thing he does is worsen our draft position buy a spot or two and keep a kid from playing.
You responded to my question about Vanek not making the team better. So I ask you, what is the point of bringing Vanek in? Keep in mind my arguments of us not making the playoffs with him ect...Does that make your point right now or something?
You said he doesn't make the team better, you didn't say he doesn't make us a playoff team.You responded to my question about Vanek not making the team better. So I ask you, what is the point of bringing Vanek in? Keep in mind my arguments of us not making the playoffs with him ect...
I missed the IF my bad, I was just about to edit, but figured this was easier.You responded to my question about Vanek not making the team better. So I ask you, what is the point of bringing Vanek in? Keep in mind my arguments of us not making the playoffs with him ect...
ffs, of course I would be talking about playoffs because whats the point in getting a couple more points than we did this year? its common sense.You said he doesn't make the team better, you didn't say he doesn't make us a playoff team.
He does, in fact, make the team better. Abby doesn't have 2:21 a game on the PP and injecting another 55+ point player on the team.
Your point was never about playoffs until I responded to you. I don't think Vanek has 0 value at the deadline.
The only thing he does is worsen our draft position buy a spot or two and keep a kid from playing.
right but now we aren't playing a kid because hes on the team. listen I'm all for bringing in guys that can help the team, but not when it keeps younger players off it. i dont see the point. If he doesn't get us into the playoffs, I see no point in signing him since we all know we can't get anything at the TDL for him.So really no worse than what the current draft lottery format did for the team the past 2 seasons?
right but now we aren't playing a kid because hes on the team. listen I'm all for bringing in guys that can help the team, but not when it keeps younger players off it. i dont see the point. If he doesn't get us into the playoffs, I see no point in signing him since we all know we can't get anything at the TDL for him.
Playing a kid cuz he's a kid isn't necessarily good.right but now we aren't playing a kid because hes on the team. listen I'm all for bringing in guys that can help the team, but not when it keeps younger players off it. i dont see the point. If he doesn't get us into the playoffs, I see no point in signing him since we all know we can't get anything at the TDL for him.
I'm making an educated speculation based on previous events.Playing a kid cuz he's a kid isn't necessarily good.
And you don't know ****, you're speculating.