kliq
Registered User
- Dec 17, 2017
- 2,727
- 1,319
Because production is a rate.
GAP? What is that?
If someone scores 20-20-40 in 30 games, is that the same as someone who scores 20-20-40 in 82 games? Or 192 games? Or 800 games?
Production is a rate. If you don't find a way to rate it, it's a useless, meaningless statistic.
It's not inaccurate.
it's totally accurate.
But it's more prone to change. It's less predictive.
But it's totally accurate. it's what happened.
It means that Bertuzzi has been more productive than Crosby at 5 on 5 this year.
That's obvious.
It could change in 3 weeks if Bertuzzi goes ice cold.
The vets aren't struggling?
So who is struggling?
Why are we sixth last in goals/60?
No, it doesn't bother me if kids are called out.
It bothers me that that kids ARE THE ONLY ONES called out.
There are no articles where HSJ or Khan go ask Zetterberg what they think of the coach calling out the ****ty leadership of the team.
There are no articles where HSJ or Khan go ask Helm about Zetterberg criticizing the awful turnovers he had.
It's Mantha. It's AA. Or, maybe it's the kids.
Because 1) this coach is a coward who's never controlled the veterans on this team and 2) the leadership in the Red Wings' dressing is nowhere near as good as advertised.
It's very hard to debate with someone when they don't actually read what you write. Perfect example is this:
I said:
Won't argue you on the Frk/Helm comparison, I agree with you there. Same thing with the kids doing good, I agree with you there as well. I also dont disagree with you that a lot of the vets are struggling.
You said:
The vets aren't struggling?
So who is struggling?
Why are we sixth last in goals/60?
Seems to me you are just looking for an argument. Even when I agree with you, you get argumentative.