Red Wings in 10th - Time Is Now

stratego

Registered User
Oct 31, 2008
21
0
I like where the team is at Ken Holland said, I like where the team is at.

While I don't think anyone is encouraged by what Ken Holland says in the article, you'd have to be a pretty big idiot to ever believe what a GM says to a guy writing an article about their impending deadline strategy. Or anything at all during the season, really. What a GM says, and what a GM does are often opposites.

He's looking for a forward.
 

Edge of Sanity*

Guest
The team should be very good when healthy, somewhere around 4th or 5th best in the conference. People hate Samuelsson and Bertuzzi, but they're good for 15 goals/40 points and are a hell of a lot better than Cleary and Abdelkader. Ideal lineup when healthy:

Filppula-Datsyuk-Nyquist
Franzen-Zetterberg-Brunner
Tatar-Helm-Samuelsson
Tootoo-Emmerton-Bertuzzi
(Andersson, Eaves, Abdelkader, Cleary, Miller)

Kronwall-Ericsson
Smith-Quincey
Kindl-Colaiacovo
(Lashoff, Wite)

Howard
Gustavsson

That team is not bad at all. Obviously we'll never be lucky enough for the forward corps to look like that, but we can dream. Get a guy like Yandle or Bouwmeester at the deadline and they'd have a legitimate chance at the Cup. I'm not worried; the only thing I'm worried about is whether they actually get healthy.
 

Jussha

Registered User
Jan 15, 2006
1,562
0
The better question is: When is the last time a coach has gone 5 years between Stanley Cups on the same team when he's lost talent every single year including 3 of their top 4 defensemen and replaced them with nothing.

It would be amazing how quickly Babcock would 'find his voice' if Holland got him some talent.

that's the thing, you need to always be bringing in fresh blood who are new and find his approach fresh to buy into the system. With Bowman, even his voice was likely getting a bit stale with the team, but then all of a sudden Holland gave him

Hasek
Robitaille
Hull

and a young talented rookie in Datsyuk

I'm not sure if there were others, but that's still 4 significant players.

The fresh new blood this season was

Samuelsson
Quincey (last trade deadline)
Brunner
Tootoo

possibly Tatar can be this year's datsyuk if he gets to stay in the lineup

for most part I think those players are all playing well under Babcock, the only real mistake I see, if we got a real talented player who could be healthy in the top 6 instead of Samuelsson, this team could be pretty dynamite still, though that would mean Tatar might not be the rookie in the lineup if that were the case
 

RedWinger10

Registered User
Feb 11, 2013
946
2
Not the end of the world..YET!

With the exception of the top 2 seeds (Chicago and Anaheim) you can expect to see a tight (~10 point) race for the remaining 6 slots. A 48 game season will make for some last few games of make it or break it circumstances for many teams in both conferences. It will certainly be a tight race at the end to make the playoffs, and you can bet Detroit will be in that race unless they buckle down and play consistent for the second half of the season. The wings are in 10th but if you look at the standings DETROIT IS ONLY 2pts OUT OF 3rd. That's a regulation win and we are tied for 3rd. A lot of teams are struggling so its not the endo of the world YET.
 

14ari13

Registered User
Oct 19, 2006
14,118
1,219
Norway
The problem is players like Datsyuk and Zetterberg will never let that happen. They are too talented and care too much about winning to allow the team to get that bad.

I remember seeing a video where Babcock saw Z and Datsyuk working out hours after everybody else went home and he asked them to slow down because they were playing the Blues tomorrow night. They responded by saying they were getting ready for the playoffs.

Players like Datsyuk and Zetterberg don't play for the regular season.

I think it wil be a tight race till the end. I am not so sure the Hawks and Ducks are running away either. They might hit the wall and injuries and then ...
 

WingedWheel1987

Registered User
Jan 11, 2011
13,339
912
GPP Michigan
Wings cant be third.

Top three seeds go to division winders.

Highest they can get is the 4th seed.

@ 14ari13

Wings aren't catching the Hawks. It would take a historic effort from both the Wings and the Hawks for that to happen. A historic collapse and a historic comeback.
 

Squirrel in the Hole

Be the best squirrel in the hole
Feb 18, 2004
1,751
303
Sydney
The team should be very good when healthy, somewhere around 4th or 5th best in the conference. People hate Samuelsson and Bertuzzi, but they're good for 15 goals/40 points and are a hell of a lot better than Cleary and Abdelkader. Ideal lineup when healthy:

Filppula-Datsyuk-Nyquist
Franzen-Zetterberg-Brunner
Tatar-Helm-Samuelsson
Tootoo-Emmerton-Bertuzzi
(Andersson, Eaves, Abdelkader, Cleary, Miller)

Kronwall-Ericsson
Smith-Quincey
Kindl-Colaiacovo
(Lashoff, Wite)

Howard
Gustavsson

That team is not bad at all. Obviously we'll never be lucky enough for the forward corps to look like that, but we can dream. Get a guy like Yandle or Bouwmeester at the deadline and they'd have a legitimate chance at the Cup. I'm not worried; the only thing I'm worried about is whether they actually get healthy.

I think you need to consider that Bert and Helm may not be back this year, and if they are, will not be what they once were.
 

Squirrel in the Hole

Be the best squirrel in the hole
Feb 18, 2004
1,751
303
Sydney
To me, it doesn't matter anymore. Babcock's time is up.
Tell me when the last time a coach went 5 years between Cups in the NHL on the same team?

Do you have a belief that Babcock is the guy who is going to not only turn the team around, but turn it into a Stanley Cup contender?

I don't.

I see a coach who knows he has a voice issue. And once it's gone, it's gone for good.

He'll be a great coach, but not with Detroit.

In the meantime, I still want to make the playoffs.

...and you would do this by firing Babcock now and replacing him with Renney? Good luck with that.
 

nik jr

Registered User
Sep 25, 2005
10,798
7
Sometimes there's a man... I won't say a hero, 'cause, what's a hero? But sometimes, there's a man. And I'm talkin' about Dan Cleary here. Sometimes, there's a man, well, he's the man for his time and place. He fits right in there. And that's Dan Cleary, in Detroit.

dan_cleary-x-large.jpg
vladdy, you're out of your element!

Firing Tippett was the biggest mistake Dallas has made in some time. Neither coach since has even come within a fraction of getting the best from the team.

When you fire a coach for the sake of change, all I'm saying is, be careful what you wish for. Lots of us following Dallas thought the team needed a change but it's been pretty miserable since and astonishingly clear it was the PLAYERS that were the problem. Cue all the core veterans being shipped out since and for the first time the team looks like they have a fighting chance under a far inferior coach to Tippett.
agree

i always like tippett, and was not sure why dallas fired him. did nieuwendyk fire tippett? if so, that combined with the terrible trade of james neal make him look bad.

2 points separate, but you're not really thinking it through very well.

1. Wings have played a lot more home games than road games, and the Wing's road record is terrible.

2. Wings have played more games than pretty much every other team. So yeah, we're "in the race" but that's only because other teams have 1-3 games in hand on us. If they all played those games, we could be 4-6 points out of the playoffs, easily.

3. This is a shortened season, less time to make up points. We're almost 1/2 way through the season.

All that means is that looking at "2 points" and saying the Wings are right in it is stupidly deceptive. Wings are further out than that. They are benefiting from home games and more games played.
yep

very precarious position
 

sarcastro

Registered User
Jul 28, 2005
13,059
1
I would say that the schedule is soft this week and then gets brutal the rest of the way, but the Wings seem to play like **** against terrible teams and play pretty well against good teams. So who the hell knows.

I just hope that if they're going to miss the playoffs, they do so spectacularly. They need to miss badly enough that they can sell some dead weight at the deadline and get a better crack at Seth Jones.

That's if they're going to miss the playoffs. Personally I think they'll sneak in and get pasted in the 1st round.

Lindy Ruff

I think Ruff is a good coach, but the dude has never won anything and only got close when Hasek carried him there.

He would get about two seconds of leeway before the same people calling for Babcock's head started calling for his.
 

PullHard

Jul 18, 2007
28,394
2,470
I think Ruff is a good coach, but the dude has never won anything and only got close when Hasek carried him there.

He would get about two seconds of leeway before the same people calling for Babcock's head started calling for his.

I just threw out his name because I saw Cap'n Bobby ask who was a coach that stuck with a team without winning a cup within a 5 year window. Wasn't he with the Sabres for upwards of 20 years? Seemed like a pretty obvious example so I just randomly threw it out there. I don't personally think much of him as a coach. I guess we may potentially be looking at him, though, right? If Babs really does go?
 

Epsilon

#basta
Oct 26, 2002
48,464
369
South Cackalacky
To me, it doesn't matter anymore. Babcock's time is up.
Tell me when the last time a coach went 5 years between Cups in the NHL on the same team?

Do you have a belief that Babcock is the guy who is going to not only turn the team around, but turn it into a Stanley Cup contender?

I don't.

I see a coach who knows he has a voice issue. And once it's gone, it's gone for good.

He'll be a great coach, but not with Detroit.

In the meantime, I still want to make the playoffs.

I think you are confusing the NHL with SEC football.
 

sarcastro

Registered User
Jul 28, 2005
13,059
1
I just threw out his name because I saw Cap'n Bobby ask who was a coach that stuck with a team without winning a cup within a 5 year window. Wasn't he with the Sabres for upwards of 20 years? Seemed like a pretty obvious example so I just randomly threw it out there. I don't personally think much of him as a coach. I guess we may potentially be looking at him, though, right? If Babs really does go?

He'd probably be on the list. Tough to tell if they would go with the crusty veteran coach or the OHL hotshot coach. There have been a ton of those completely unproven guys hired lately, probably chasing after the success the Pens had with Bylsma. Problem is Bylsma's pretty much the only one that's had any success.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,229
14,729
It's hilarious you guys want Babcock to continue contending for cups every year with completely not acknowledging the fact that his roster has got consistenly thinner since 2009, and that is someone elses job.

If you're going to blame someone, or lobby for someone to get fired, make it the job who has not done his job well recently. Babcock is doing very well given what little he has. Getting mad at him for not being at the top of the conference is like getting mad at someone for losing the Datyona 500 driving a Toyota Prius. Makes no sense. He doesn't have the tools he needs.
 

RedWingsNow*

Guest
It's hilarious you guys want Babcock to continue contending for cups every year with completely not acknowledging the fact that his roster has got consistenly thinner since 2009, and that is someone elses job.

If you're going to blame someone, or lobby for someone to get fired, make it the job who has not done his job well recently. Babcock is doing very well given what little he has. Getting mad at him for not being at the top of the conference is like getting mad at someone for losing the Datyona 500 driving a Toyota Prius. Makes no sense. He doesn't have the tools he needs.

Excuses.
 

cupforwings09

Registered User
Mar 30, 2010
483
0
Michigan
That crap about firing Babcock should be in the crappy thread about firing Babcock...
The team seems to be overachieving, although any team with D and Z should be competitive. When healthy, they will be a top 5 team in the West. Its all about health.
 

14ari13

Registered User
Oct 19, 2006
14,118
1,219
Norway
Wings cant be third.

Top three seeds go to division winders.

Highest they can get is the 4th seed.

@ 14ari13

Wings aren't catching the Hawks. It would take a historic effort from both the Wings and the Hawks for that to happen. A historic collapse and a historic comeback.
I do not think anyone is catching up with the Hawks, in any case not the Wings for sure, but I am saying they might be hit by injuries and then.
Wings are in 4th place :D
We were for a couple of hours.
It's hilarious you guys want Babcock to continue contending for cups every year with completely not acknowledging the fact that his roster has got consistenly thinner since 2009, and that is someone elses job.

If you're going to blame someone, or lobby for someone to get fired, make it the job who has not done his job well recently. Babcock is doing very well given what little he has. Getting mad at him for not being at the top of the conference is like getting mad at someone for losing the Datyona 500 driving a Toyota Prius. Makes no sense. He doesn't have the tools he needs.
Holland has not done much to improve this team.
 

RedWingsNow*

Guest
So, it stings more, coming off back-to-back losses to the BJs, but we got the 5 points in 8 games. Sucks because we started with 4 in two games.

The Red Wings have 29 points in 26 games. As of this moment, they are in 4th place, but everyone below them has 1-2-and-3 games in hand, and there are 8 teams who are just 3 points back.

Overall, the Red Wings record is 12-14.
At home they are 9-7.
On the road they are 3-7.

And now we go on the road.
The Wings need to average a point per game on the road.
 

Bench

3 is a good start
Aug 14, 2011
21,225
14,978
crease
Nobody outside of the Ducks and Hawks can get any separation from the pack. The last 20 games are going to be wild and have lots of leapfrogging on a daily basis.
 

RedWingsNow*

Guest
Nobody outside of the Ducks and Hawks can get any separation from the pack. The last 20 games are going to be wild and have lots of leapfrogging on a daily basis.

Yep. But you also don't want to far too far behind.
If the Wings don't improve their road record, they're toast. Plain and simple.

I think they will.

One team I expect to start pulling away soon is the Blues. If they can keep winning on the road, they'll get their act together at home.

I'm still expecting to finish in the 6 to 10 range.

We may be catching a break with our Northwest conference swing. That conference sucks this year.
 

RedWinger10

Registered User
Feb 11, 2013
946
2
We will NEVER get back to scoring unless that 2nd line is scrapped and redone. You can't win much less try to make a run for the playoffs with 1 (ONE) scoring line. I mean is Babcock BRAIN DEAD? He's taken Datsyuk out of every game that he has played that line.
 

Bench

3 is a good start
Aug 14, 2011
21,225
14,978
crease
Yep. But you also don't want to far too far behind.
If the Wings don't improve their road record, they're toast. Plain and simple.

I think they will.

One team I expect to start pulling away soon is the Blues. If they can keep winning on the road, they'll get their act together at home.

I'm still expecting to finish in the 6 to 10 range.

We may be catching a break with our Northwest conference swing. That conference sucks this year.

All of this is exactly part of the NHL's master plan. More teams in the playoff hunt mean more fans in more cities care down the stretch. It also gives bubble teams a better chance of getting into the playoffs and spurring a fanbase who may not see many to hit some playoff games.

It's kind of a huge downer for Detroit, but for the rest of the league it's certainly creating some better drama.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad