Upgrade your account today to enjoy the forums ad-free.
Click here to upgrade: Account Upgrades

RD Adam Boqvist - Brynas J20, Superelit (2018, 8th, CHI)

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by VictorLustig, Dec 17, 2016.

  1. DramaticGloveSave

    DramaticGloveSave Voice of Reason

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2017
    Messages:
    4,012
    Likes Received:
    1,177
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Gender:
    Male
    Depending who's picking 2nd, I could see him going as high as that.
     
    Samuel Culper III likes this.
  2. TheWhiskeyThief

    TheWhiskeyThief Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2017
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Numbers & viewings is all we have. The viewings and the numbers say he's a comp to Brannstrom, so unless the class is down overall, don't see him that highly. YMMV.
     
  3. Pavel Buchnevich

    Pavel Buchnevich AV AND GORTON OUT

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Messages:
    29,080
    Likes Received:
    3,610
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New York
    What is so similar to Brannstrom? I think they are different players. Brannstrom is more of a puck moving defenseman, Boqvist more of an offensive defenseman.
     
    Castle8130 and Samuel Culper III like this.
  4. TheWhiskeyThief

    TheWhiskeyThief Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2017
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Wait, what? Isn't that the same thing? A defenseman with the puck on his stick, creating chances? Or does the former just let go of the puck at the red line? Or is it that an offensive defenseman is somebody who is so substandard in his own end he has to make up for it.

    All I am saying isBoqvist has a tremendous willingness to jump in to play, but the only place he's pulling it off is in J20 where he does everything but drive the zamboni. All I see is warning signs. Hasn't earned ice time in 2 men's leagues, didn't earn ice time at 5 nations, is never going to get that big, isn't producing enough to demonstrate elite skill to make up for the size disadvantage.

    But asides from that, he's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
     
  5. Pavel Buchnevich

    Pavel Buchnevich AV AND GORTON OUT

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Messages:
    29,080
    Likes Received:
    3,610
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New York
    No, its a different thing.

    A puck moving defenseman is someone who makes quick decisions in their own zone to get the puck going up the ice. They can transport the puck up and out of the zone, as well. Where they excel most is with getting the puck from one zone to the next to let the real offensive playmakers create plays. Brannstrom is really solid in his own end, makes good, decisions with the puck and is a very good skater who can carry the puck into the zone. He's not anywhere near the dangler that Boqvist is. He does have some offense in his game, maybe an above average amount, but he's not anywhere near as creative of a hockey player as Boqvist who is a point producer and chance creator. Boqvist's primary contributions will be in point production and chance creation. He can also move the puck, he can defend, but those are secondary areas of contribution for him.

    Just about no one pulls off Boqvist's style of play at his age in a men's league, let alone the SHL. Dahlin can play an offensive game in that league, but Dahlin is also a generational prospect. Boqvist's also very young for this draft. And if you are going to make a big deal about points at this 5 Nations tournament, would you make a big deal in the opposite direction about his points at the Hlinka? Some tournaments, teammates finish chances. Other tournaments, they don't. Why are the points a bigger determinant factor in his play than his shift to shift game? I also think Boqvist is more solid defensively than his reputation. He plays a very risky offensive game, but he defends well without the puck.
     
  6. JAS 39 Gripen

    JAS 39 Gripen Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,947
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Stockholm
    What? How could you possibly think that Brännström and Boqvist lare comparable by your "viewings"? I call BS on this one
     
  7. 93LEAFS

    93LEAFS Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    19,667
    Likes Received:
    2,761
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Toronto
    He has ridiculous upside if everything clicks, but at this point he would scare me in the top 5. Now, bad teams are generally desperate for D, so it will be interesting how it plays out. I would think all of the high-profile wingers are safer while still having high-upside in Svechnikov, Zadina, Tkachuk, and Wahlstrom. Sorting out that group of D behind them is something else. I think I like Dobson the most due to the safety but remaining high upside, followed by Boqvist, Hughes, and Bouchard in that order. While, I can understand taking him at 2 if you legitimately believe he's the next Erik Karlsson, but, personally, I think that is way more risk than I would be comfortable with.

    If he could show more in either the Allsvenskan or SHL by the end of the year I might be convinced of a top 5 standing. And, yes, I am aware Karlsson was almost exclusively in J-20 in his draft year. But, he was drafted 15th, and can be considered a bit of an outlier, in the opposite corner you have someone like Lars Jonsson (highest drafted guy to primarily play J-20 in recent years). Most of the impact Swedish defenders that were taken high were firmly in the SHL or Allsvenskan at 17 (Larsson, Hedman, and OEL). H. Lindholm split time between the SHL and J-20 (20 games to 27). Now, you obviously also have cases of late-round gems like Klingberg who weren't even firm J-20 players at that age.

    He probably has the widest range of any of the guys at the top of the draft (outside of possibly Denisenko). He could realistically go anywhere from 2 (unlikely) to 14 (unlikely). His sweet spot is probably 5 to 9.
     
    ChadS likes this.
  8. Pavel Buchnevich

    Pavel Buchnevich AV AND GORTON OUT

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Messages:
    29,080
    Likes Received:
    3,610
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New York
    How many people have him below 5? I've seen very few lists where he's not in the top 5.
     
  9. 93LEAFS

    93LEAFS Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    19,667
    Likes Received:
    2,761
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Toronto
    His stock held primarily based on Hlinka. It will be interesting to see how his stock holds after a good but not great showing in Plymouth. Remember at this time last year, Liljegren was still top 5 in a bunch of places because people were reluctant to drop him heavily until closer to the U-18's. Just checking the TSN guys, FC and Hockey Prospect, the only one of those lists from a comparable time last year to have Liljegren out the top 3 was HockeyProspect.com who had him at 7.

    Craig’s List: Patrick remains in the top spot despite injury - Article - TSN

    Patrick has decided edge in TSN Hockey Mid-season Draft Ranking - Article - TSN

    He's playing at a lower level and plays an atypical game which as pointed out is hard to transfer over to a men's league. That makes him fairly high-risk compared to the safety of some easier projections.
     
  10. AppsSyl

    AppsSyl Registered User

    Joined:
    May 28, 2015
    Messages:
    3,066
    Likes Received:
    1,120
    Trophy Points:
    94
    I completely agree with your entire post regarding Boqvist. I like Boqvist a lot, but think he is a tremendous risk in the top 5, when you have high floor with high ceiling guys available. I would grab him for sure in that 7-10 range though.
     
  11. NikF

    NikF Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Home Page:
    Just to chime in on this, because back then we felt like alone on an island for our early Liljegren rankings. We had Liljegren 3rd in Europe behind both Hischier and Pettersson already back in September 2016 with top 7 overall value. In January we valued him as a top 10 value pick, behind Elias Pettersson who was alone with top 5 value (Hischier left for NA).

    We haven't had Adam Boqvist as a top 5 overall pick on our board going back to last year, highest he's been was top 15 after Hlinka (current rank was made public in our Winter Release thread). That's not to say there is no possible way he will be that good, but in our eyes it's far from a sure thing.
     
  12. docbenton

    docbenton Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    66
    The difference between Boqvist and Liljegren is that by the end of last year people really soured on Liljegren's upside, in that they felt he didn't have the offensive IQ to be a top PPQB. I don't think people feel that way about Boqvist (yet), even though the production isn't there. Both are high risk, but Boqvist is percieved to have that boom factor because of superior skill and IQ.
     
  13. Pavel Buchnevich

    Pavel Buchnevich AV AND GORTON OUT

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Messages:
    29,080
    Likes Received:
    3,610
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New York
    I think we are also seeing that Liljegren was under-drafted.
     
  14. 93LEAFS

    93LEAFS Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    19,667
    Likes Received:
    2,761
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Toronto
    People soured on him because he hardly progressed in a full season and he was coming off an illness. The knock was more on him skating into crowds and having untimely turnovers than his ability to run a PP which he could do in the SHL at 16.

    Either way, I don’t want to continue to turn this into a Liljegren thread. I just used him as an example because of where his stock was at the same point last year.
     
    TheGoldenJet likes this.
  15. Cap'n Flavour

    Cap'n Flavour Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    3,645
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Flavour Country
    How does Boqvist compare to the seemingly endless supply of smaller offensive D in this draft?

    Quinn Hughes - appears to be having an excellent freshman season at Michigan
    Ty Smith, Calen Addison, Ryan Merkley - all three are PPG in the CHL but other than Merkley's rankings dropping like a rock I haven't seen a whole lot written about their seasons
     
  16. le_sean

    le_sean Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    22,592
    Likes Received:
    2,571
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Ottawa
    Wouldn’t be surprised to see GMs prefer the big Canadian RDs like Bouchard and Dobson over Boqvist. They have the size, the point totals and they play a lot of big minutes in places that are easily scoutable.
     
  17. 1972

    1972 "Craigs on it"

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    984
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Canada
    Boqvist looks significantly more dynamic then Liljegren does though, but obviously they have some similarities.
     
  18. Lays

    Lays Vitaly Swagtsov

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2017
    Messages:
    4,379
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    NJ
    I’d take either over Boqvist
     
  19. Lampedampe

    Lampedampe Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    316
    Trophy Points:
    89
    Id be anxious picking a boom or bust guy in the top-5. But his upside is just too high to pass on at the same, feeling abit conflicted tbh.

    When was the last time we saw a defenseman like him picked in the top 10?
     
  20. Zaddy

    Zaddy Retired.

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2013
    Messages:
    9,460
    Likes Received:
    933
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Cale Makar last year?
     
    felixpettersson likes this.
  21. Kalleteodor

    Kalleteodor Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    26
    One thing that strikes me when comparing Boqvist with Liljegren and also with a lot of other offensively skilled D-men is that he playes with very high accuracy. While I´ve seen Liljegren do some risky moves and playes, it´s very rare to see Boqvist make a move or pass and fail. I can´t recall ever seen him lose the puck on the blue line causing a turnover. There are plenty of D-men that thrives on playing an easy game and do few mistakes. Boqvist do very few mistakes (with the puck) and constantly makes moves that requires a lot of technical skill.

    What I would like to see from him when it comes to improvements is to play the game with higher intensity especially in defense. His coolness combined with lack of size can sometime make him a bit “out of the game” in defense. I would recommend him to look at Brannstrom and try to copy his game in d-zone.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2018
    Iceman likes this.
  22. Lampedampe

    Lampedampe Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    316
    Trophy Points:
    89
    Haven't been following Makar at all tbh, so wasn't aware he was a boom or bust kind of defenseman, but yeah looking into it seems like a decent comparable.
     
  23. CacOBG

    CacOBG We got Dahlin

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Messages:
    6,207
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Location:
    Europe
    Of course Makar was a boom or bust. He was playing in a joke of a league that you cant accurately project what he will look against better QOC.
     
  24. Lampedampe

    Lampedampe Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    316
    Trophy Points:
    89
    Did I say otherwise? I simply stated I haven't followed or paid much attention to Makar and acknowledgd it's a good comparable after looking into it abit.
     
    IComeInPeace likes this.
  25. schnapshot

    schnapshot Mendoza baby

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2015
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    955
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Montreal
    Not the first time a player from the Junior A program is drafted high... They’re usually not any more boom or bust types than the Americans drafted out of high schools.
     
    lawrence and felixpettersson like this.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"