Rate the draft eligible players: #2

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Digable5, Jun 17, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. Digable5

    Digable5 Buffalo Proton (Positively Charged)

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Sales
    Location:
    West Seneca
    Ok, quickly on to No. 2. I got a lot of bad feedback for even having the #1 poll, but I'm glad I did it. And where else do you start, but at Number 1.

    Anyways, despite some requests to just move on to #3, here's No. 2 because a few players got votes for #1 that are not named Ovechkin or Malkin.

    Pick who you think is the best, and nominate one to be added to the list. Poll closes after 2 days.

    (Thanks to eSabre)

    Results so far:
    1. Alexander Ovechkin LW 47 of 62 votes 75.81%
    (2. Malkin 7 votes, 3. Chipchura 4 votes)
     
  2. Flames Draft Watcher

    Flames Draft Watcher Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary
    Home Page:
    Yeah obviously protest, joke or what have you votes. There's NOBODY out there who seriously thinks Chipchura is the #1 prospect, you'd have to be crazy to believe that.
     
  3. Flames Draft Watcher

    Flames Draft Watcher Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary
    Home Page:
    As for this one, I'll vote Wolski when Malkin is clearly the obvious choice, just to make you think this was a worthwhile exercise when in fact it was a complete and utter waste of time.
     
  4. Digable5

    Digable5 Buffalo Proton (Positively Charged)

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Sales
    Location:
    West Seneca
    I'm sure that the votes for Chipchura aren't legit, but the ones for Malkin in the last poll were. If you think its a complete waste of time, then just don't vote.

    Why is this some great offense to you?
     
  5. Flames Draft Watcher

    Flames Draft Watcher Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary
    Home Page:
    I think it's completely and utterly pointless. What does 8 votes for Malkin as the #1 tell you vs 52 for Ovechkin? Nothing you didn't already know IMO. There aren't a lot of days left before the draft and you've wasted several on picks that were completely obvious. At a rate of a poll every two days you won't get very far before the actual draft is upon us.

    I am bewildered that you are attempting to defend your position that the first poll wasn't completely pointless, your logic in that defense makes no sense to me. And I'm at a loss to understand or explain why you're wasting time on pointless polls when we could actually be having a poll that means something and whose final results aren't known before you even put it up.

    It's like asking a rhetorical question and then waiting a day or two for all the answers when you already knew what the answer was.
     
  6. canucksfan

    canucksfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    34,849
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    British Columbia
    Home Page:
  7. AgentOrange*

    AgentOrange* Guest

    What a useless poll (although not as useless as the first).

    Anyways, I voted for Chipchura for the hell of it, like I did in the first poll. :D
     
  8. Big McLargehuge

    Big McLargehuge Registered User

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    68,923
    Likes Received:
    1,207
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    S. Pasadena, CA
    If Malkin doesn't get 100% of the votes something is seriously wrong.

    And something is seriously wrong.

    Mezsaros has votes for crying out loud...Chipchura, Wolski, Barker...pathetic.
     
  9. Digable5

    Digable5 Buffalo Proton (Positively Charged)

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Sales
    Location:
    West Seneca
    First of all there are people out there that believe Malkin is better than Ovechkin and the poll was to gauge just how many. And since I have read several articles and threads that have Schremp ahead of Malkin for number two (talent wise), I wanted to see just how close it is. This is for my benefit and for anyone else who's interested in the results. Granted, I should not have made the polls to close in 2 days, but I'm human and made a mistake. Apparently you do everything right.

    If you don't care about this, then don't participate. And if you could do it better, then go for it. I didn't see you create any poll like these before this existed.

    A complete waist of time is you writing about how much of a waist of time you think this is. If you don't like it, create your own or don't even look at the thread.

    I'd create a poll for who the most uptight jacka** on the hfboards is, but that too would be a waist of time because we all know its you. Relax a little bit, will you.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"