Entirely unrelated. Eakin signed a 2 year bridge for only $1.9M AAV. That contract and this contract from Faksa are comparable. You would evaluate Faksa's 2nd contract to Eakin's 2nd contract, not his first.
Not unrelated at all.
He's not handing out heaps of money to RFA's for no reason. Faksa is already a better player than Eakin, in pretty much every facet of hockey, and he does it without getting ample time with Benn/Seguin and pp time.
IMO Faksa could have asked for quite a bit more, especially when considering the 3rd yr. He doesn't necessarily have much leverage which is why, technically you're right they're not comparable
But ever since that travesty Nill hasn't thrown excess money at his RFA's, and he has to know Vegas did him a huge favor, two with the Methot trade.
And he did a good job spacing the contract so that when he does have to pay Faksa his due, Hanzal's gone