Question to American fans about marketing of the World Junior Championships in the US

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rabid Ranger

2 is better than one
Feb 27, 2002
31,015
11,021
Murica
ehc73 said:
I guess that's just stupid strategy by USA Hockey. Why put it in a nontraditional market? St. Paul would sell out in a second if it were held there. Hell I bet even Portland would be a better draw than Grand Forks.


Grand Forks, ND (and Northern Minnesota) is a "traditional" hockey market, after all the Fighting Sioux enjoy tremendous support. I see alot of bellyaching in this thread about marketing and such, but the event has been well organized, and well attended. So what if a sizable portion of the fans come from Canada? That's a nice option to have if you ask me.
 

Bruwinz37

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
27,429
1
Gurj said:
A host of one of the talk shows up here in Vancouver mentioned how Canada is drawing more fans in Grand Forks than the Americans.

This lead to an American calling in and making this point: The term "Junior" does not appeal to Americans and make some look down on the event because of this term. They (the organizing committee and USA Hockey) should have used the term "World Collegiate Hockey Championships" in the marketing campaigns due to the popularity of college sports in the US.

Do any Americans here have any thoughts on this?

Two thoughts on this. 1-too many Americans do not appreciate the game of hockey and 2-it doesnt surprise me that more Canadians have shown up because Grand Forks is just about as much Canada as it is the US. :joker:
 

jiggs 10

Registered User
Dec 5, 2002
3,541
2
Hockeytown, ND
Visit site
Skylab said:
A couple of points
1. yeah the reason Canada is drawing so well is that Canada has huge cities like Brandon (40, 000 people), Morden (6200) and Winkler (6400) so close. I agree that Grand Forks isn't exactly in the middle of a huge American population base but to claim that the relatively close proximity of "huge" Canadian "cities" like Winkler give Canadians a leg up in attendance numbers is ludicrous

2. only Crosby is as good as any of the players you see in NCAA. wow, that may be the most assinine thing I've ever read on these boards. I'm not going to slam NCAA hockey, because some very good players have come that route, but you so underestimate the quality of Canadian major junior and European pro leagues (not to mention someone like Bergeron, you I might suggest is at least as good as the average NCAA player; sarcasm intended)

NCAA hockey is AT LEAST as good as most "major" junior hockey in Canada (as evidenced by the amount of college players in the NHL who are not just "there", but STARS).

Grand Forks is 50,000 people. So the Canadian towns and cities I mentioned add up to more than our population, plus they have minor hockey, major junior hockey, and etc. So they are very important to the region in terms of hockey fans.

This year's WJC is setting RECORDS for attendance (according to USA Hockey and the local newspaper), so to say that it is a "disappointment" or any other word except "exceptional" is ridiculous. It may not be drawing 11,000 a game like they had hoped, but today's Canada game drew 8,500 despite 10 inches of snow in the last 2 days and the closing of the main highway into Grand Forks on Friday.

I'm sorry if you think Patty Bergeron is so wonderful. He is a very good player, but I've seen better in the past 3 years just at UND alone (Parise, Bochenski, Brady Murray) who, if not for the NHL lockout, would be showing you that. And that's just here. Add in all of the other NCAA players who were drafted in the last 2 years, and it adds up to a pretty impressive list.
 

The King of Town

Registered User
Jan 26, 2004
5,395
4
Free Country
jiggs 10 said:
I'm sorry if you think Patty Bergeron is so wonderful. He is a very good player, but I've seen better in the past 3 years just at UND alone (Parise, Bochenski, Brady Murray) who, if not for the NHL lockout, would be showing you that. And that's just here. Add in all of the other NCAA players who were drafted in the last 2 years, and it adds up to a pretty impressive list.

Speaking as a Sens fan, I would trade Bochenski for Bergeron any day of the week, and twice on Sunday. (Please don't flame me Bruins fans, I know it would never happen, I'm just trying to make a point). BTW, Bochenski would not have made the Sens this year.

Seriously, tell me you don't believe what you just said... The level of competition between the NCAA and NHL is immensely different, the fact that Bergeron didn't look out of place at all was amazing.

And don't bother trying to count the number of NCAA products compared to the CHL or the Euro leagues... you're going to embarass yourself.
 

Skylab

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
1,234
0
Saskatoon
Visit site
jiggs 10 said:
NCAA hockey is AT LEAST as good as most "major" junior hockey in Canada (as evidenced by the amount of college players in the NHL who are not just "there", but STARS).

I'm sorry if you think Patty Bergeron is so wonderful. He is a very good player, but I've seen better in the past 3 years just at UND alone (Parise, Bochenski, Brady Murray) who, if not for the NHL lockout, would be showing you that. And that's just here. Add in all of the other NCAA players who were drafted in the last 2 years, and it adds up to a pretty impressive list.


Don't try to water down your original post and certainly don't put words in my mouth

Your original post included
"Because other than Crosby, none of these guys is as good as the players we see on a regular basis playing NCAA Division I games."

My response included
"I'm not going to slam NCAA hockey, because some very good players have come that route, but you so underestimate the quality of Canadian major junior and European pro leagues (not to mention someone like Bergeron, you I might suggest is at least as good as the average NCAA player; sarcasm intended)"

Did I say that Canadian major junior hockey was better than NCAA? No, I didn't. I have no desire to get into a pissing war about junior hockey and NCAA. I simply responded to your very bold claim that outside of Crosby no one at this tournament was as good as division one players.

I don't, as you put it believe that Bergeron is "so wonderful". I do think he is a good young player who surprised last year and if he keeps it up has a bright future in the NHL ahead of him. The difference between him and Parise et. al. is that he's already shown what he can do at the NHL level. Will he be the better pro, who knows. Although IMO, the others have to show they can make it before it's even worth comparing. My original point, and I'll make it again for you, is that Bergeron is certainly an example of a player other than Crosby that is as good as what you get to see on a game by game basis in division one.
 

Hackett

BAKAMAN
Mar 4, 2002
21,545
9
Visit site
I heard Miller and McGuire talking about Detroit being a possible place for americans to hold their next WJHCs

I think it makes a lot of sense because even if detroit doesn't show up for the games, then its close enough to the border for canadians to make it a huge success.

Detroit likes to call themselves hockeytown so lets see how they support the under 20's.

JLA or the Palace are prolly venues that are too big but I guess they can play on their university campuses.... although I'm not sure how close they are to detroit.
 

Keetz

Registered User
Sep 14, 2004
799
0
Little Falls
Rabid Ranger said:
Grand Forks, ND (and Northern Minnesota) is a "traditional" hockey market, after all the Fighting Sioux enjoy tremendous support. I see alot of bellyaching in this thread about marketing and such, but the event has been well organized, and well attended. So what if a sizable portion of the fans come from Canada? That's a nice option to have if you ask me.
well your right to a point. I have to side with ehc73 on the St.Paul idea. being so far away from a major airport would have cut air prices down to make it affordable. :dunno: (marketing wise)
 

Street Hawk

Registered User
Feb 18, 2003
5,348
19
Visit site
Scheduling...

That's one of my issues with this tournament. Quarter finals were on Saturday, Jan 1, bowl games mania in the States. They follow it up with the semis on Sunday, Jan 2, the final Sunday in the NFL.

Then the Gold medal game is on Tuesday, Jan 4 which is the National Championship game for NCAA football.

Just given the scheduling of this tournament, during the final 2 weeks of the NFL, college programs looking for new coaches, college bowl games especially in the elimination rounds, and the overall popularity of hockey in the US, it doesn't surprise me that the World Juniors doesn't get any publicity in the States.
 

Epsilon

#basta
Oct 26, 2002
48,464
369
South Cackalacky
I've always preferred when this tournament is played in Europe personally. There's always something more special about getting up early in the morning before anyone else is up at Christmas time to watch the game, then opening presents if it's Christmas day or cooking breakfast for everyone else who is just waking up. Having it in primetime during the holidays just puts it in the way of stuff like hanging out with friends or playing a game of hockey on the outdoor rink and other fun holiday stuff that doesn't involve the television.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
23,740
38,206
colorado
Visit site
people keep saying they had it in boston, it was in amherst which isnt really close to boston. i know people from other parts would say "whats the difference", but there is a bit of one.

as far as the whole tourney lacking support, id say from what ive seen on tv, its doing a lot better than amherst did. i went to that, and it was a ghost town. who cares which fans show up, as long as people did. i tried to arrange a trip from colorado, and plane tickets were like 450 bucks 3 months ago. package deals were starting at 1500, and individual tickets were like 30 bucks. i want to see the juniors as much as anyone else, but i cant afford nhl tickets. i thought it would be a bit cheaper, especially being n dakota....obviously not. if it had been more affordable, at least one more american wouldve been there.

being in n dakota was probably based on the facilities more than anything else. thats a brand new rink that cost millions and ive met people who have been there and have said its unbelievable. with all the sioux fans, they probably figured they would have at least have a strong local turn out (looks like they did). minny might have been better from our stand point, but i think it probably worked better from the facility pov. i think its better off in a strong collegiate place like that, a major metro area wouldnt have given the special treatment the locals in n dakota gave it.
 
Last edited:

Sinurgy

Approaching infinity
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2004
12,425
3,877
AZ
zenator1 said:
One bizarre aspect of the tournament is the choice of music during the US games.

"American Woman" and "Born in the USA".

Both songs are highly critical of the US, so I find it strange they are played during US games. I could see people missing the point of Born in the USA, as the Boss is kind of subtle, but American Woman ? Not subtle at all... "I don't need your war machines, I don't need your ghetto scenes; American Woman: get away from me, etc. "

I'm not American, but I'm a little embarrassed for any US fans at the game that may have noticed this.

For the dummy who plays these tunes, just because a song says "USA" or "America" doesn't necessarily mean they are pro-US.
Not to mention both songs completely suck but I couldn't agree with you more. Lets face it, no matter what country you are from we all have our share of morons!

My favorite is when I go to a game and when they want to pump up the crowd they start jamming the main riff from "The Beautiful People". I wonder what half those upper middle class parents would think if they knew they were dancing around and waving their hands to none other than Marilyn Manson. haha tooo funny!

Sorry, getting off topic...anyway, I do agree many Americans associate the term "junior" with kids but it's not worth changing the name of the tournament. I'm all about being an ambassador of the game but you have to draw the line somewhere when it comes to attracting non-hockey fans.
 

ceber

Registered User
Apr 28, 2003
3,497
0
Wyoming, MN
go kim johnsson said:
I'm sure if St. Paul got this tournament it would be a lot more supportive.

I wouldn't bet on it. It's not like the World Jrs. is the state high school tourney or anything.

;)
 

John Flyers Fan

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
22,416
16
Visit site
Macman said:
Do you remember Boston? It was a disaster. U.S coach Jackie Parker called the Beanpot a more important tournament, if you can believe that. I'll never understand why Americans don't warm to it. Only the Olympics and World Cup are better tournaments.

It's not just Americans, take a look at the attendance for games played in Europe. The WJC is widely popular in Canada and Canada only.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->