No one said they're the softest team in the league (that i saw anyway) - However, they definitely lost their sheriff. Physicality as a whole last year, especially in the post season where they let a soft team (Tampa) steamroll them with a severe lack of push back. Yes, there were other serious issues with secondary scoring... but lets not ignore the fact that the Bruins physicality was an issue as well (which people try to justify or ignore completely)
Garbage deal by Sweeney unless he's bringing someone else in and needed the money.
ya just never know what comes across his desk.
Then of course, there is the chance you do know
100%, this makes me worried going into the season. Wonder what happens vs Montreal when Shaw and maybe Domi are trying to rough up our forwards bc they know they have nobody to answer to. Teams will take liberties all year.
100%, this makes me worried going into the season. Wonder what happens vs Montreal when Shaw and maybe Domi are trying to rough up our forwards bc they know they have nobody to answer to. Teams will take liberties all year.
100%, this makes me worried going into the season. Wonder what happens vs Montreal when Shaw and maybe Domi are trying to rough up our forwards bc they know they have nobody to answer to. Teams will take liberties all year.
Uhhh Shaw? You mean the guy that big bad Krug crushed multiple times last year? Yeah not scared of those two guys at all.100%, this makes me worried going into the season. Wonder what happens vs Montreal when Shaw and maybe Domi are trying to rough up our forwards bc they know they have nobody to answer to. Teams will take liberties all year.
Uhhh Shaw? You mean the guy that big bad Krug crushed multiple times last year? Yeah not scared of those two guys at all.
I just don't think you understand at all the value if having a sheriff like Mcquaid . You don't want Krug taking care of Shaw and taking himself off the ice
How does a "Sherriff" (hate that phrase for hockey) do this responsibility from way up top from the roof box?I just don't think you understand at all the value if having a sheriff like Mcquaid . You don't want Krug taking care of Shaw and taking himself off the ice
Do you really think that Krug is going to be “taking care of” Shaw? He hit Shaw in the course of play, which started the stuff between them.
Shaw would not be fighting McQuaid anyway. It’s not what he does.
How does a "Sherriff" (hate that phrase for hockey) do this responsibility from way up top from the roof box?
Ya but if Shaw pulls cheap stuff after the whistle or anyone else does the same. Mcquaid is there quickly to the defense. I expect other teams manipulate the lack of team toughness and goad the bruins into pentalies quite a bit this year
Hypothetically speaking, McQuaid was still on the Bruins and is upstairs eating popcorn during this scenario, what's your response?
Well, he instills fear from there. The opposing team knows he's looking down on them, ready to throw his popcorn against the wall if there is an incident on the ice. Sheriff has now made it's way to #2 on terrible hockey terms. Nothing will replace using the word hungry to describe a player. I'll use it in a cringy sentence. "David Krejci is not hungry enough when on the ice."
I think it's a ridiculous scenario so I don't really have a response to that. Besides last year he plays a majority of the season and is a plus player as his stats show.
Well, he instills fear from there. The opposing team knows he's looking down on them, ready to throw his popcorn against the wall if there is an incident on the ice. Sheriff has now made it's way to #2 on terrible hockey terms. Nothing will replace using the word hungry to describe a player. I'll use it in a cringy sentence. "David Krejci is not hungry enough when on the ice."
Go ahead and disparage Mcquaid. I find it funny how cocky Sweeney fans get. Too bad you never win anything to back it up.
I think it's a ridiculous scenario so I don't really have a response to that. Besides last year he plays a majority of the season and is a plus player as his stats show.
Season | Season Games | GP | % of GP |
2010-11 | 82 | 67 | 82% |
2011-12 | 82 | 72 | 88% |
2012-13 | 48 | 32 | 67% |
2013-14 | 82 | 30 | 37% |
2014-15 | 82 | 63 | 77% |
2015-16 | 82 | 64 | 78% |
2016-17 | 82 | 77 | 94% |
2017-18 | 82 | 38 | 46% |
Total | 622 | 443 | 71% |
Nobody disparages McQuaid, the fact is Cassidy saw him as the #7 D last year and sat him when everyone was healthy. With John Moore added he was looking at being the #8 D in our lineup, he wasn't going to get a ton of games. It would have been nice to have a guy like that in reserves but that wouldn't be right for McQuaid who is playing for what will likely be his last contract. People that like the trade are happy for McQuaid who will have better opportunities than he would have had here to make a case for a good next contract. Nobody here dislikes McQuaid, but the time to trade him was now and not just for the Bruins' sake but for McQuaid's sake.Go ahead and disparage Mcquaid. I find it funny how cocky Sweeney fans get. Too bad you never win anything to back it up.
Go ahead and disparage Mcquaid. I find it funny how cocky Sweeney fans get. Too bad you never win anything to back it up.
Actually, his stats show that he played LESS than a majority of the season last season, and by every account was going to play even less this coming season. Not even bothering to formulate a response to the most likely scenario for his usage this coming season tell me you're not interested in having a true, honest discussion about this.I think it's a ridiculous scenario so I don't really have a response to that. Besides last year he plays a majority of the season and is a plus player as his stats show.