BigFatCat999
First Fubu and now Pred303. !@#$! you cancer
I'm curious what the cost would be to get Puljujärvi but you have to take Lucic with 1 million retained?
Serious?I'm curious what the cost would be to get Puljujärvi but you have to take Lucic with 1 million retained?
Well, that will end this thread.....One additional problem with Lucic, as already mentioned here and there, is the protection spot you'll need to use on him during the Seattle expansion draft.
I'm curious what the cost would be to get Puljujärvi but you have to take Lucic with 1 million retained?
If he's traded the teams don't have to honour his nmc . He just has to want to leave edm enoughOne additional problem with Lucic, as already mentioned here and there, is the protection spot you'll need to use on him during the Seattle expansion draft.
Pulju + Lucic (1m retained) + 2nd + 3rd
For
Your 1-2 year cap dump for 2.5m or under.
2 negative assets? Edmonton will need to add a real good asset to move them both in a package
As of right now the Oilers also have to protect Lucic in the expansion draft, correct?
A likely bust and a 4th liner with a 5.8 million cap hit until he's like 39 has negative value.
Not necessarily. Most teams would be taking on the risk of his contract and there would be enough time in between now and then to get a good understanding of whether or not hes worth it. Neal was exposed and taken. Could be a similar situation and if lucic goes to a cap team, that team would more than likely WANT Seattle to take him.One additional problem with Lucic, as already mentioned here and there, is the protection spot you'll need to use on him during the Seattle expansion draft.
If he's traded the teams don't have to honour his nmc . He just has to want to leave edm enough